tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post6525056894426483633..comments2024-03-28T11:18:27.317-04:00Comments on LSAT Blog: LSAT Unplugged YouTube / Podcast: December vs. February LSAT | Admissions Pros and ConsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-42789409879229226902019-09-27T21:52:47.740-04:002019-09-27T21:52:47.740-04:00Does the same advice apply to someone taking the J...Does the same advice apply to someone taking the January LSAT?Bennetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05209484211339332000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-14558866566044275822013-12-09T12:32:30.764-05:002013-12-09T12:32:30.764-05:00I'm really desperate to start law school this ...I'm really desperate to start law school this September (I'm 30, so feel like I don't have time to wait another year!), and have my heart set on Fordham. I've got a good academic record - I'm from the UK, but LSAC ranked my BA and MSc degrees as 'Superior', which I think is around a 4.0. I, stupidly, only studied for about a month for the LSAT, scoring between 165-174 in practice tests. I just took the December exam, and it was a disaster (I messed up with transferring to the answer sheet, and ended up guessing at least 15 questions). I doubt I'll get above a 160. I checked with Fordham, and it seems that they do accept February retakes, so I had planned to do that. However, reading your post has made me think that this isn't a good idea. Assuming I get a 160 in the December LSATs, do you think I would be better of applying to Fordham in January with a 160 (their median is 163, 75th is 165 and 25th is 162), or waiting until March and applying with LSATs that will probably (hopefully) be around the 170 mark? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com