tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post944095626253652173..comments2024-03-29T09:30:20.418-04:00Comments on LSAT Blog: LSAT Unplugged YouTube / Podcast: Newer Logic Games: Before, After, But Not Both | PrepTest 53Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-13006600671933057092020-05-15T18:38:59.347-04:002020-05-15T18:38:59.347-04:00Good blog i like this bro.Good blog i like this bro.Unknowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08126687324761359501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-65621687997709374282010-09-20T16:26:12.185-04:002010-09-20T16:26:12.185-04:00Why didn't you combine and end up with the two...Why didn't you combine and end up with the two possibilities are: V before GPLJ (Option 1)<br />LPJG before V (Option 2)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-55899217661053163902010-03-18T23:36:47.196-04:002010-03-18T23:36:47.196-04:00Hey John,
They didn't use these in 57 (June 2...Hey John,<br /><br />They didn't use these in 57 (June 2009), 58 (September 2009, or 59 (December 2009). 60 is June 2010.<br /><br />It's possible that these will be on the June 2010 test, but no one can say for certain except LSAC.<br /><br />They're worth learning just in case.Steve Schwartzhttp://lsatblog.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-51554025007482616912010-03-13T15:46:51.576-05:002010-03-13T15:46:51.576-05:00Hey Steve, do you know if they ended up using thes...Hey Steve, do you know if they ended up using these rules in PT 57 (June 2009), or what would've been PT 58, 59, or 60?<br /><br />I don't have any problems with these, but the wording is just a little confusing, so I was wondering if they've been included on any of the recent ones. <br /><br />What are the possibilities of it occuring on the June 2010 test?Johnnoreply@blogger.com