tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post7877000306322579313..comments2024-03-28T05:21:49.590-04:00Comments on LSAT Blog: LSAT Unplugged YouTube / Podcast: December 2012 LSAT Logic Game SolutionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-937194596367151622013-10-28T01:49:05.134-04:002013-10-28T01:49:05.134-04:00Hi Steve,
Thank you so much for the video! I have...Hi Steve,<br /><br />Thank you so much for the video! I have a quick question regarding one of your deductions. It makes a perfect sense that in order for the S-Q -> Q3 rule to work, S is required to be in 1 and Q 3, but I am still not sure why that rule can also deduce when Q is in 3, S is in 1. To me, that seems like a mistaken reversal (meaning the inference is made from Q3 -> S-Q, not S-Q -> Q3). I spent hours on this single game, but it is still giving me so much trouble. I'd really appreciate your input :) Thank you! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-14309175291838846062013-09-14T16:04:54.258-04:002013-09-14T16:04:54.258-04:00why do you not make another row to keep track of t...why do you not make another row to keep track of the F/ N/ W attributes? is it because there are no questions about it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10294095.post-87736308647505440212013-03-12T09:38:52.558-04:002013-03-12T09:38:52.558-04:00Great explanation and POE, it helps a lot.Great explanation and POE, it helps a lot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com