LSAC on New LSAT Retake Limits

"We want to prevent bad actors from abusing our policy. We saw repeaters who were concerning to us—more than we expected—in some tiny minority of cases. [The council] has to be cautious of the people who try to strategize about how to get an unfair advantage on our test."
— Lily Knezevich, senior vice president for learning and assessment at the Law School Admission Council (LSAC), commenting on the reinstatement of limits on the number of times people may take the LSAT each year. Beginning in September [2019], pre-law students may only take the LSAT three times in a testing year, which runs from June through May. Under the new rules, would-be law students may take the LSAT up to seven times total. LSAC had previously done away with these limits in 2017 when it increased the number of LSAT testing dates from four to nine.

From the National Law Journal:

“Unfortunately, these [limits] are not good for test-takers,” said Steve Schwartz, an LSAT tutor who also blogs about the test. “Your LSAT score is the biggest factor in determining your financial aid. To impose this kind of limit privileges those who don’t need the financial aid and leads others to take on massive loans for law school.”⁣
⁣⁣
⁣The new limit will also put more stress on those taking the LSAT for the third time in a year, knowing it’s their last shot during the cycle, he said.⁣
⁣⁣
⁣Both Schwartz and Killoran said they believe part of the council’s motivation for the new limit is to allow it to reuse more LSAT tests with a lower risk that repeaters will encounter the same questions. Schwartz said it cost an estimated $750,000 to develop each LSAT and that it makes sense the council would want to reuse tests now that there will be 10 administrations each year.⁣






"Law School Admission Council, Newtown, PA 18940
Dear LSAT registrant,
You are receiving this communication because you have taken, or have registered to take, the LSAT in the 2019-2020 testing year. We want you to know that LSAC is committed to providing a fair and equitable testing program and maintaining the integrity of the LSAT. We will be updating our test-taking limit policy later this summer and it will go into effect with the September 2019 LSAT administration. We are still finishing up the final details of the new policy, but we know that there has been a lot of conversation on social media recently, so we wanted to share the basic elements in an effort to reduce the speculation and any anxiety. Based on our estimates, this policy will impact a small number of people – less than 1 percent of all LSAT test takers.
In effect starting with the September 2019 test administration, test takers would be permitted to take the LSAT:
  • Three times in a single testing year (the testing year goes from June 1 to May 31).
  • Five times within the current and five past testing years (the period in which LSAC reports scores to law schools).
  • A total of seven times over a lifetime.
  • This policy is forward-looking, not retroactive. Tests taken prior to September 2019 will not count against these numerical limits.
In addition, test takers would not be permitted to retake the LSAT if they have already scored a 180 (perfect score) within the current and five past testing years, the period in which LSAC reports scores to law schools. This policy will be applied retroactively.
There will be an appeals process for test takers who have special circumstances and want to request an exception to this policy.
We hope that this helps to address many of the questions. We will provide more detail in the weeks ahead. In the meantime, please reach out to us at 215.968.1001 or at LSACinfo@LSAC.org if you have additional concerns regarding our test-taking limit policy.
Sincerely,

The Law School Admission Council"

Malcolm Gladwell LSAT Podcast - Some Thoughts

Anyone else listen to the Malcolm Gladwell LSAT podcast and feel like he didn't know what he was talking about?

He says, "why do we value speed?" as if it shouldn't be valued, but he doesn't give any compelling reasons WHY!

Just because the time constraint makes things harder for him or anyone else doesn't mean we should give everyone more time on the test. (And, if we gave *everyone* more time, those who do better than others now would likely *still* do better than everyone else - because they'd be getting the extra time, too!)

I don't find his arguments compelling - I think he's missing something crucial here. And this relates to his earlier work, Blink (kind of ironic that Gladwell "forgets" about this, actually). 

Being able to work quickly, efficiently, and see things *intuitively* under severe time constraints is important for the practice of law. 

Does all law require this all the time? No. But speed does indicate something about mastery of the content. And the LSAT is strongly correlated with 1L grades and bar passage (which is important if you're investing 3 years of your life and hundreds of thousands of dollars).

I heard his argument talking about how it rewards hares and punishes tortoises, but so does real life! Instead of complaining about having difficulty on the LSAT because he's not good at it, and saying they should get rid of strict time constraints, he should spend more time studying for it.

This is classic low-scorer thinking ("I can't do well on the LSAT, so the problem is with the exam, not with me.")

And not prepping with some random company hardly anyone's heard of (Noodle?) He could have at *least* gotten a few dozen actual LSAT exams and studied to the same extent as the average decent-scoring student.

I'm not saying book smart = business/life/street smart

But if we're getting rid of or deemphasizing the LSAT, we should do the same for the bar exam. We don't want law schools admitting students who can't pass the bar exam. And the LSAT's the best predictor of that we have.

The REAL scandal here is that the wealthy can afford to pay doctors for ADHD diagnoses to get extra time, giving them an unfair advantage over everyone else.I'll admit I liked him somewhat before this. I guess that it took him commenting on an area of expertise for me to realize he lets his idea of a "grand narrative" supersede the facts.

Just because the time constraint makes things harder for Gladwell or anyone else doesn't 
mean we should give everyone more time on the test. (And, if we gave everyone more time, those who do better than others now would likely still do better than everyone else - because they'd be getting the extra time, too!)

The REAL scandal here is that the wealthy can afford to pay doctors for ADHD diagnoses to get extra time, giving them an unfair advantage over everyone else.


Khan Academy LSAT PrepTest List

Full list of Khan Academy LSAT PrepTests:
Diagnostic: PrepTest 78
Test 1: LSAT PrepTest 66 (Exp PT 53 Reading Comp)
Test 2: LSAT PrepTest 68 (Exp PT 53, Logical Reasoning Section 1)
Test 3: LSAT PrepTest 70 (Exp PT 53, Logical Reasoning Section 3)
Test 4: LSAT PrepTest 69 (Exp PT 53 Logic Games)
Test 5: LSAT PrepTest 54 (Exp PT 55 Logic Games)
Test 6: LSAT PrepTest 76 (Exp PT 55 Logic Games)
Test 7: LSAT PrepTest 79 (Exp PT 55, Logical Reasoning Section 1)
Test 8: LSAT PrepTest 81 (Exp PT 55, Logical Reasoning Section 3)
Test 9: LSAT PrepTest 64 (Exp PT 63 Logic Games)
Test 10: LSAT PrepTest 67 (Exp PT 63 Reading Comp)

7 Biggest LSAT Test Day Mistakes

7 of the biggest LSAT Test Day mistakes to avoid:

  1. 1. Name on government ID not matching the one on your admission ticket. University ID no good.

  2. 2. Focusing on other people before the exam and during.

  3. 3. Getting bogged down on tough questions and thinking it's the end of the world.

  4. 4. Get stressed about / stuck on a previous question/section when you've already moved on.

  5. 5. Thinking it's all about this one test.

  6. 6. Trying out something new - this is just another PT you've taken. You've practiced things a certain way - stick with what you've been doing.

  7. 7. Worrying too much about the results on this one test. While the LSAT as a whole is incredibly important, no one particular test will make or break you - you can always retake. Law schools don't average multiple scores - they only take the highest.

Law School Work Experience Concerns

Below, I respond to a law school applicant's concern about only having customer service work experience on law school application resume:

It's tough for one's career to grow up in the shadow of the recession, rise of automation, etc. Law schools understand that it's hard to get "impressive" work experience with "just" a BA.

Overall, work experience isn't nearly as important as LSAT/GPA. I wouldn't worry much about it. I have students who take 6+ months or a year to just study (parents supporting them), and they have nothing on their resumes during that time. It doesn't really matter. Just get the best LORs you can and work on spinning your work experience if you choose to write about it.

For example, connection between law (principle-application) and applying the pseudo-legalistic frameworks of customer service guidelines to specific customer support cases.


Final Week LSAT Prep Advice

In the last few days before the LSAT, do a full-length timed exam or two, along with excruciatingly detailed review.
If your schedule doesn't permit all of this, taking only one exam is fine. The one constant would be rest the day before.
Real review takes time. Most people don't spend enough time reviewing. If you got 10 questions wrong, and another 15 you weren't 100% sure of but still got right, that could take at least 3-4 hours if done properly - a full day of study.
Here's a final week study schedule:
Day 1 - Wrap up reviewing questions you haven't reviewed yet, or take the day off.
Day 2 - Take a full exam, or a few timed practice sections, and review them today and tomorrow.
Day 3 - Rest day (along with a little review from the previous day).
Day 4 - Take a full exam and review (or review it tomorrow)
Day 5 - Full exam and/or review previous day's full-length exam.
Day 6 - Relax. No studying. Massage, hot bath, movies, nature, meditation, yoga.
Day 7 - Rock Test Day.

Take it easy. Don't do too much. You don't want to risk burnout.
At this point you pretty much know it or you don't. It's about pulling it all together and being consistent.
You could also mix in some review of weak areas here and there, especially over the next few days, but the focus should be on pacing and endurance at this point.

Relaxation:
  • meditate
  • hot bath
  • massage
  • walk in nature (weather permitting, it's freezing here in NYC at the moment)
  • TV
  • leisure reading


Law school application advice for student previously dismissed

It sounds like a law school application addendum would probably be in order. Short, to the point, matter of fact, explaining why things didn't go as well as they could've the first time around. Not a list of excuses, but instead an acknowledgment of what you could've done differently, what you've learned, etc.

Again, short - less than one page. And don't make this the focus of your law school personal statement - instead, treat it is a separate short addendum. 

Good luck!


LSAT Reading Comp Speed Advice

How long do you spend on your initial read of each LSAT Reading Comp passage? I generally recommend 2.5-3 minutes at most.
You might consider cutting down your annotations even more. As an exercise, try to walk with NOTHING but the main point. The main point is the biggest takeaway you need when doing LSAT Reading Comp passages. And if you've got that, you can knock out a lot of general questions (main point, primary purpose, title, tone, etc.)
ETA: You can also work to build your understanding as you go along, by doing the LSAT Reading Comp questions in a strategic order: general (main point, primary purpose, title, tone, passage organization, etc), local detail-oriented (esp. those with line references), and finally inferential (questions like what would author be most likely to agree with, questions similar to LSAT Logical Reasoning questions, etc.)

Final LSAT Test Day Prep Advice

I recently put a ton of videos on YouTube about getting ready for LSAT Test Day.
Links below.
But first, here are 7 quick LSAT Test Day prep tips:
  • Make an LSAT Test Day playlist with motivational songs and videos
  • Practice mindfulness meditation
  • Make sure you allow time for sleep, diet, exercise, and relaxation
  • Simulate test day conditions and prepare for distractions
  • Relax the day before, but...
  • Pack your bag the day before
  • Do a few warm-up questions before entering the test center

LSAT Test Day Prep Videos (including what to bring and what NOT to bring)
LSAT Test Day Motivation Playlist (including Steve Jobs, Jock Jams, Elle Woods, and Alan Watts)
All the best to everyone and hope you rock the exam!

Law School Admissions + Teach For America

Answering a law school applicant's question about how strong a soft factor Teach For America would be:

It's always hard for me to answer "how" questions. This sort of thing isn't really quantifiable. I suspect that it definitely helps, in large part because it's so difficult to get accepted into Teach For America (so you show you passed through another "filter"), and even harder to stick with (which shows perseverance in difficult circumstances - teaching's hard!)

Softs pale in comparison to LSAT+ GPA, but Teach For America is incredible work experience and could likely provide material for a great law school personal statement.

Why I'm Not Wishing You Good Luck on the LSAT

I don't like wishing people good luck. Why think of ourselves as slaves to chance? Instead, we should trust in our abilities.
"In bocca al lupo" is an old Italian proverb that literally translates to "in the mouth of the wolf." The customary response is "crepi (il lupo)," which literally translates to "kill (the wolf)."
The idea is that when faced with adversity, you should have the mindset that you will overcome it. Luck is not a factor. You will destroy whatever obstacles get in the way of achieving your goals.
So, rather than wishing you all good luck, I'm going to remind you that when you encounter the LSAT, kill it.

LSAT Test Day Advice