Did you know that December exams tend to have most lenient curves?
The "curve" on the most recent December exams was very generous. The December 2009 and December 2010 LSATs each allowed you to have 14 incorrect answers but still get a 170. (The average for December exams in recent years prior was only 11.375 incorrect answers).
The below chart contains recent data regarding the number of questions you could get wrong on recent exams and still achieve a particular scaled score (out of 180):
(See what it's taken to get an LSAT score of 160 or 170 on all LSAT PrepTests.)
Come back to this blog post after you take the LSAT and post your curve predictions in the comments!
Photo by blprnt_van
-15?
ReplyDeletePredicting -10 or -11
ReplyDelete-11
ReplyDelete-13. RC was... difficult.
ReplyDeleteRC was ridiculous. Extremely dry topics didn't help either. - 13 would be awesome.
ReplyDelete-13, RC was the killer
ReplyDelete^ I agree. Reading comp was brutal
ReplyDeletehope for -14
ReplyDeleteRC was definitely difficult. What did you all think of the LG?
ReplyDeleteI am very good at logic games. I have been consistently scoring above 95% on games (i.e. 1 or 2 questions wrong per section). I didn’t find the LG section for PT 65 very difficult. It was pretty standard.
ReplyDeleteRC killed me tho
ReplyDeleteI thought the LG was a cake walk. Hopefully I scored most of the LR correctly, had to guess on 1 for each section. I expect RC to be my weakest (unless the 3rd section was scored and the 5th was experimental, which I doubt). Fingers crossed on a -12.
ReplyDeleteIn the October exam, the experimental was #4 for the first time ever... so you can never tell... Come on LSAC!! Give us our scores!!
ReplyDelete