June 2012 LSAT Logic Game #3 Explanation

I just made a video explanation for the third LSAT Logic Game from the June 2012 LSAT (PrepTest 66). It's the "sales zones / representatives" game (Kim, Mahr, Parra, Quinn, Stuckey, Tiao, Udall).

I explained all questions in one video that's just under 19 minutes. (Get more free LSAT videos.)



Also see my more-detailed written Logic Games explanations available on the blog.

1 comment:

  1. Answer 15 doesn't make sense to me, almost all could find themselves in zone 3 why is it just M and K?