Is it:
-Kantian categorical imperative -Spinoza’s moral relativism -something that doesn't involve words people never use in everyday speech?
No, it’s not easy to answer these kinds of questions.
But what's MOST interesting about all this...is that people often have contradictions in their internal logic!
(Sound familiar? That's what the LSAT's all about!)
So, you can find out whether you do by trying out this "Philosophical Health Check." It helps reveal any contradictions in your reasoning.
I just tricked one of my students into trying it, and she got a tension score of 7. (Not sharing mine, sorry.)
If you get into this nerdy kinda thing (I'm guilty of it, sometimes), there is also the Morality Play, which analyzes your moral framework:
Pretty cool stuff.
So try it out and let me know what you discover!
- Philosophizin' Steve
P.S. Don’t worry too much if you got a high contradiction score - we’re just human after all! (And this isn't the LSAT.)
Recommended Resources:
1. LSAT Courses The best of my LSAT material with exclusive access to attend my Live Online LSAT Master Classes + Q&As, and on-demand video lessons you can watch anytime. Plus, LSAT study plans to keep you on track. Save hundreds of dollars with an LSAT course package.
2. Logical Reasoning Explanations The explanations that should have come with the LSAT. These don't just fall back on "out of scope," but actually tell you why the wrong answers are wrong, why the right answers are right, and the easiest way to get the correct answer.
3. Logical Reasoning Cheat Sheet Based on what I'd typically do in college: read what the professor emphasized and condense it all onto a single piece of paper. It gave me a quick reference, making things a lot less threatening and a lot more manageable.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment