Cost of LSAT PrepTests | Prep Course vs. Self-Study

LSAT Blog Cost PrepTests Self Study CourseThis post is Part 3 of the "Secret PrepTests" series. The series starts with "The Case of the Secret LSAT PrepTests."

In this post, I contrast the costs of LSAT PrepTests depending upon whether you're a prep company or a student. It turns out LSAC charges prep companies less than it charges students, but it gives the companies more exams in return.

See Part 4 (LSAC's PrepTest Licensing Policy) for how I arrive at the figures for what "What LSAT Prep Companies Pay."

See Best LSAT Prep Books for how I arrive at figures for "What Students Pay."


What LSAT Prep Companies Pay:

Exams --- # of Exams --- Licensing Fee

June 2007 LSAT - 1 exam = $0 (free download)
46-56 - 11 exams @ $5/exam = $55
32-45 - 14 exams @ $4/exam = $56
17-31 (minus PrepTest 20, which was a free PDF) - 14 exams @ $3/exam = $42
1-16 - 16 exams @ $2/exam = $32
SuperPrep - 3 exams (without LSAC explanations) @ $3/exam = $9
February 1997 LSAT - 1 exam (without LSAC explanations) = (Not available for licensing, according to email from LSAC, but prep companies print it anyway - see Part 2)

Total: 60 exams for $194 per set



What Students Pay:

Exams --- # of Exams --- Cost

June 2007 LSAT - 1 exam = $0 (free download)
43-56 - 14 exams @ $8/exam = $112
39-42 - Not available for student purchase (pending availability on Amazon).
29-38 - 10 exams @ $2/exam in book of 10 = $20
19-28 - 10 exams @ $2/exam in book of 10 = $20
(PrepTest 20 was also a free PDF) = $0
18 - 1 exam @ $2/exam in book of 10 = $2
17 - Not available for student purchase.
9-16 - 8 exams @ $2/exam in book of 10 = $16
8 - Not available for student purchase.
7 - 1 exam @ $2/each in book of 10 = $2
1-6 - Not available for student purchase.
SuperPrep - 3 exams (with LSAC explanations) = $18
February 1997 LSAT - 1 exam (with LSAC explanations) - (now called LSAC's ItemWise - online-only) = $18

Total: 49 exams for $208 per set

You can't even get the other 12 without buying them used (if you can find them) or illegally downloading them.

***
Read on for Part 4, "LSAC's PrepTest Licensing Policy."

Photo by dborman2

LSAC's PrepTest Licensing Policy

LSAT Blog LSAC PrepTest Licensing PolicyThis post is Part 4 of the "Secret PrepTests" series. The series starts with "The Case of the Secret LSAT PrepTests."

In this post, I include:

1. additional emails with an LSAC Publications Dept. rep about PrepTest licensing costs.
2. my brief calculations of prep companies' actual costs for one full set of PrepTests.

***

My Additional Emails with Felicia (an LSAC Publications Dept. rep)

These are edited for brevity.
Steve: Is there a fee to license PrepTest 20 and the June 2007 LSAT, given that they're both available for free download on LSAC's website?

Publications Rep: There is not fee (sic) to print the free downloads.

Here’s the fee schedule as noted in our license policy
PrepTests 46 – 56 $5 per test, per copy 11 test x $5 = $55
PrepTests 32 - 45 $4 per test, per copy 14 test x $4 = $56

PrepTests 17 - 31 $3 per test, per copy 15 tests x $3 = $45

PrepTests 1 - 16 $2 per test, per copy 16 tests x $2 = $32

TOTAL: $188

Feb 1996, 1999, 2000 @ $3 each would be an additional $9
***

My calculations:

$188 (for PrepTests 1-56) + $9 (for Feb 1996, 1999, and 2000 PrepTests) = $197
$197 - $3 (for PrepTest 20 - was a free PDF on LSAC's website)= $194

Total cost to prep companies = $194

***

Read on for Part 5, "Suggestions for LSAC on Restructuring LSAT PrepTest Sales."


Photo by ifindkarma

Suggestions for LSAC on Restructuring LSAT PrepTest Sales

This post is Part 5 of the "Secret PrepTests" series. The series starts with "The Case of the Secret LSAT PrepTests."

In this post, I discuss why and how LSAC should change its policies regarding student access to PrepTests.

LSAC earns $194 for each student who receives a full set of licensed exams from the prep companies, and all LSAC has to do is give prep companies the PDFs.

The prep companies pay all printing and distribution costs, but they get to market themselves as the exclusive providers of otherwise unavailable PrepTests.

Meanwhile, LSAC enjoys the $18 in profit for the online "ItemWise" Feb 1997 exam. I can't think of a good reason why this exam should be online-only or why it should cost $18. SuperPrep also contains LSAC explanations and costs about $18. However, it's an actual book, and it contains 3 exams.

For LSAC, it seems to be all about the passive income.

Given that most students probably wouldn't purchase $194 or $208 worth of exams on their own, it makes financial sense for LSAC to create scarcity. LSAC wants to give students an incentive to take a course and indirectly pay (through prep course fees) for $194 worth of exams.
Even if a student independently bought two $20 books and 10 individual exams at $8/exam, that's "only" $120, and Amazon and the printing companies get a sizable cut of that.

When LSAC has prep companies do the printing, that $194 is pure profit, baby.

This is a great business model for LSAC, which continues to earn money off these exams long after it has recouped the cost of writing them. However, LSAC is not a business - it's a nonprofit whose ostensible purpose is to serve the public interest, law school applicants, and law schools.

If the word "free" makes LSAC shudder, it should borrow the iTunes concept and let students download every PrepTest as a PDF from its website for a flat fee of 99 cents each. If 99 cents is too low, the least LSAC could do is match what it charges the prep companies. Either way, LSAC's sales of PrepTests would skyrocket, and it'd no longer have to give a cut to Amazon, bookstores, or printing companies.

Students wouldn't waste so much time searching online for PDFs and answer keys because it wouldn't be worth the trouble. The alternative, legally purchasing the exams through LSAC, would be easier and more appealing for students. Besides, these sales would be pure profit for LSAC.

LSAC is technically a nonprofit, but it sure doesn't act like one. Many LSAT-takers are college students or recent graduates (many of whom are unemployed). The cost of a prep course is prohibitive for many. (Courses are often unhelpful, aside from the PrepTests they provide. Please see the LSAT Blog Manifesto for my thoughts on courses.)

The cost of purchasing all past exams is prohibitive as well. Students tend to scrounge for the money, do without the exams, or turn to illegally downloading PDFs.

If LSAC wants to fight "piracy" of its PrepTests and end its discriminatory limits on access to them, it would do well to reconsider its policies.

***
Will there be a Part 6?

It's up to you. Enough of you are reading this that you can do something about it.

You can email LSAC at LSACInfo[at]LSAC[dot]org or call them at 215-968-1001 (then press 0).

Please be firm but polite. The people answering the emails and phones aren't evil, and they're not the ones making the decisions. Just ask the representatives to pass your feedback along to those who do make the decisions.

If LSAC contacts me with anything substantive, I'll publish it on the blog.

***

Update
: Read on for Part 6, "LSAT Logic at LSAC."

Beating the LSAT Interview on Legal Blog

The Blackbook Legal Blog recently interviewed me about LSAT preparation.

In the interview, I answer the following questions:

1. Can the LSAT be learned?

Without a doubt, the LSAT can be learned. There's no question on that matter. The easiest and fastest way to improve is to become familiar with various LSAT question-types. This doesn't take very long, but the payoff is minimal. The quickest way to see a significant improvement is to learn solid diagramming techniques for the Logic Games. This takes a moderate amount of time. The next step is to understand the LSAT mindset. This is the most difficult task. It's like becoming a Jedi or seeing through the Matrix.


2. Is the LSAT a good predictor of law school performance?

I believe that the LSAT is a good independent predictor of law school performance. People born with the LSAT mindset are likely to do well on the LSAT and in law school. People who intensively prepare for the LSAT and eventually acquire the LSAT mindset are likely to intensively study in law school and eventually get the law school mindset.



3. What is the LSAT mentality?

Learn to be critical and skeptical of arguments, avoid taking things at face value, consider potential alternative causes for any result and potential alternative explanations for any conclusion, devote obsessive attention to detail, understand nuances and apply general principles to specific situations.



4. How long does it take to adequately prepare for the LSAT?

1-2 months is not adequate for the vast majority of students, especially when they have to balance LSAT prep with school or work. Students who shoot for high scores (as well as those shooting for mid-level scores) need time to fully understand the various sections, to develop strategies for attacking them, and to work on pacing and endurance strategies. I recommend that students devote a minimum of 3 months of preparation and that they study on a regular basis during this period of time.


LSAT FAQ | Common Questions When Starting LSAT Prep

Most people starting their LSAT prep tend to have the same basic questions. This post is my attempt to answer some of the most common ones.

What is the LSAT, and what's on it?
The LSAT is the Law School Admission Test. It contains 4 scored sections: 1 Analytical Reasoning section (Logic Games), 2 Logical Reasoning sections, and 1 Reading Comprehension section. There's a 5th unscored experimental section of any type mixed in, and you won't know which section is the experimental until later. There's also an unscored Writing Sample.


What are Logic Games?
"Logic Games" refers to the Analytical Reasoning portion of the exam. Logic Games are logic puzzles containing several variables. These variables can usually be represented by letters. Most games contain rules that impose conditional relationships between the variables. After giving you all the rules, the game will contain 5-7 questions based upon that scenario and rules. Each Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games) section contains 4 Logic Games, giving you an average of 8 minutes, 45 seconds to complete each "game." In order to solve the game within the time limit, it makes sense to learn a solid diagramming strategy.


How much time do I have for each section of the exam?
All sections of the exam are 35 minutes long. This includes scored sections, the unscored experimental section, and the unscored Writing Sample. This means that you have an average of 8 minutes, 45 seconds, to complete each Logic Game and Reading Comprehension passage because there are four of each per section.


I saw you mentioned PrepTests a few times on the blog. What are those?
They're LSAC's (Law School Admission Council's) cutesy name for previously-administered (actual) LSAT exams. They're the best source of LSAT questions for studying.


I already got an LSAT book. I went to the bookstore and got LSAT for Dummies and---
Please don't scare me like that. LSAT for Dummies doesn't use real LSAT questions. You should only use books that contain real LSAT questions. With dozens of real LSAT exams, there's no need to use fake questions.


If there are dozens of real exams, why would an LSAT book use fake questions?
Because LSAC charges a large sum of money to companies for the right to reprint past exams. Most companies choose to avoid the fee and simply write their own questions for their retail books.


What's wrong with fake questions?
1. Real LSAT questions are written by people with backgrounds in philosophy. As a result, the questions are written with a degree of tightness that is extremely difficult to match. Real questions are heavily-vetted before test-takers even see them. They're also administered as part of the exam's experimental section before they are administered as scored questions. They're simply held to a higher standard than those written for the typical retail prep book.

2. Fake questions can be constructed to demonstrate the "effectiveness" of techniques that would be ineffective on real questions.

3. Fake questions can actually be real questions in disguise (tainting recent PrepTests).



How do I know if a book uses real LSAT questions?
Believe me, if a company has paid the fee for the right to use actual LSAC-written questions, they'll brag about it on the cover. (Contrapositive: If they haven't bragged about it on the cover, they haven't paid the fee. Assuming they're not breaking the law, this means they're not using actual LSAT questions).

Here are a few books I've reviewed that don't use real LSAT questions:

Barron's LSAT Prep Book Review

Kaplan LSAT Prep Book

Princeton Review LSAT Logic Games Workout



Where should I get PrepTests?
They're available on Amazon. Amazon's the best place to buy them, and it offers the fastest shipping. Here's a big list containing every LSAT PrepTest. Out of the books I recommend, bookstores tend to stock only 10 Actual Official LSAT PrepTests (the oldest book of 10 exams). I suspect this is because it has the most official-sounding name. Some bookstores carry all the books of 10 exams, but I've never seen a bookstore stock individual PrepTest booklets.



Which LSAT prep books DO you recommend?
They're all listed in my Best LSAT Prep Books post.


How long should I study for?
There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but a minimum of 3 months is ideal.


I only have two months until my exam date, and I haven't studied at all yet.
Then you'll have to seriously buckle down in order to get into the LSAT mindset. No distractions. If you work full-time or are in school full-time, you should strongly consider postponing the exam until a later test date."


Which section of the exam is hardest?
Most students find Logic Games to be the most difficult at first. However, it's the easiest section to improve upon because it contains the fewest question types. If you create a solid diagram for each game and make the inferences, you've just netted yourself 5-7 questions.

Reading Comprehension is the most difficult section to significantly improve upon.

Logical Reasoning contains the greatest number of question-types.

The bottom line: the hardest section is different for each person.


Whenever you talk about Logical Reasoning on the blog, you talk about the stimulus and question stem. What are those?
"Stimulus" refers to the short paragraph that starts each Logical Reasoning question. It's typically anywhere from 4-13 lines long and usually contains an argument.

"Question stem" refers to the 1-2 line part that comes right before the 5 answer choices.


How much should I study for the Writing Sample?
How to Prepare for the LSAT Writing Sample contains everything you need to know. It'll take about 5 minutes to read.


Which month's test is hardest?
Please see "Hardest LSAT: Feb, June, Oct, or Dec?"


I was thinking of taking a course because it'll force me to study. If $1,500 doesn't force me to study, nothing will!
How do you expect to get through law school if you can't buckle down and study for the admission test? With regard to discipline, the only thing a course can do is make you feel guilty for not doing the homework. It may force you to go to class, but it won't force you to study outside of class. Despite your fantasies about the LSAC being a picnic, it's not. You will have to put in the bulk of your prep time outside of class.

If you want help sticking to your commitment to take the LSAT, use a site like StickK, which will donate your money to charity if you don't follow through. You can also form an LSAT study group on Craigslist.


I want to do well and am committed to studying. Should I take a course?
One big concern with courses is the lack of credentials provided about instructors prior to signing up. You should have the option to switch instructors if you don't like yours, no questions asked. I'm not necessarily saying you should skip courses altogether. Some students prefer courses over private tutoring. However, private tutoring can be more efficient (more personalization/flexibility) and serve as a supplement to self-study.


What are your thoughts on LSAT prep courses?
Please see LSAT Prep Courses vs. Private Tutoring.


How do I reach you?
I love hearing from students. You can email me at help@lsatunplugged.com


Can I have more LSAT FAQ?
Sure! Here are some more LSAT FAQ.

***
Also see Is Ten Hours in a Single Day Too Much to Study for the LSATs?, and the About the LSAT Video by LSAC.

LSAT Logic in the Colbert Report | Marijuana Legalization

LSAT Logic in the Colbert Report | Marijuana Legalization
Whatever your political views, you have to admit that while Stephen Colbert is in character on "The Colbert Report," he exhibits several logical fallacies.

Colbert recently exhibited a classic logical fallacy, the ad hominem attack. He was attacking Ethan Nadelmann, founder and director of the Drug Policy Alliance during an interview on the subject of marijuana legalization.

In an ad hominem attack, the person making the logical fallacy attacks the individual's personal characteristics, rather than the substance of the individual's argument itself.

Here's the dialogue where the ad hominem attack occurs (watch it in the video below by scrolling to 3:47):

Colbert: Have you ever done drugs?

Nadelmann: Well...I...Stephen...I have smoked the occasional joint when I'm ---

Colbert: So YOU are a criminal, and none of your arguments have validity now.

But wait - there's more.

Nadelmann makes an argument by analogy in the interview (at 2:45 in the video below). Arguments by analogy like Nadelmann's aren't necessarily logical fallacies. In order for the analogy to be valid, the things being compared must be similar in relevant ways.

Nadelmann: You can compare alcohol prohibition to marijuana prohibition.

Colbert: How so? Go on.

Nadelmann: What's going on in Mexico right now, it's like Chicago during Prohibition under Al Capone --- times 50.




The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Ethan Nadelmann
colbertnation.com


In LSAT Logical Reasoning questions, ad hominem attacks like Colbert's often occur in questions with a dialogue between two individuals. However, you can find these attacks in regular questions as well.

Being able to recognize argument by analogy is important for "method of reasoning" Logical Reasoning questions.

Top Law Schools Guide PDF

Many of you applying to law school intend to work for a law firm after graduating. The question you should ask is, "what do law firm recruiters think about each law school?"

Obviously, law school rankings are one consideration. However, law school rankings are only a tiny part of the picture. Your law school selection process should be far more detailed.

Luckily, there's a free resource at your disposal to tell you exactly what law firm recruiters think.

Check out the 2014 BCG Attorney Search Guide to America’s Top 50 Law Schools (PDF). This weighty and well-researched book has a ton of info about what each law school is actually like. If this info interests law firm recruiters, it should probably interest you, too.

This book of law school profiles is useful even if you don't want to work at a firm, and it's free.

LSAT Blog Day Winners

Thanks to everyone who participated in LSAT Blog Day last Friday! The blog's web traffic and subscriber numbers are WAY up.

I don't want to be guilty of a correlation = causation flaw, but it appears LSAT Blog Day was a huge success. Thank you!

As promised, I picked 5 blog readers to receive a free half-hour of tutoring.

The winners are:

Chelsea L. - Illinois

Chris S. - Colorado

Emil V. - Quebec

Nesta J. - California


Philip G. - New Jersey

Thanks again to everyone for participating! Don't worry if you didn't win this time. There will be more chances in the future.

LSAT Blog Day

Today, Friday, May 1st, marks exactly 5 months since I started blogging here.

We went from zero to over 1,200 subscribers in 5 months. That's CRAZY. Let's see if we can add another couple hundred today. Let's make today LSAT Blog Day!

Simply update your status on Facebook, Twitter, or anywhere else:

Get free LSAT tips and tricks: http://LSATBlog.blogspot.com

Email it to friends, pre-law groups, and anyone you can think of.

Update on Facebook. Update on Twitter.

Sound good? I'll scan Facebook and Twitter (add me here), and then I'll pick 5 random people to get a FREE half-hour of in-person or distance LSAT tutoring.

You guys rock!

Update: LSAT Blog Winners


LSAT Blog Manifesto

Since I started, several of you have asked why I write LSAT Blog.

There's one major reason:

The big LSAT prep companies aren't helping you.

Before I started LSAT Blog, there wasn't any reputable source of info about the LSAT that was neatly organized, regularly updated, and 100% free. I'm an LSAT tutor, and the Internet lowers the cost and time of distribution to zero. It's so easy to put info out there - there's no reason not to!

Sure, there are some decent LSAT books out there, but none are close to perfect. Many prep companies hold back. If they gave away all the good stuff in their retail books, you'd have less reason to pay for their $1500 courses. (This is why some companies force students to sign contracts that they won't ever resell their precious coursebooks. Students who violate these contracts are often threatened with lawsuits.) Many companies purposely leave info out of their coursebooks in order to limit their resale value. Unfortunately, this also harms students who take the courses. The prep companies' practices are immoral at best.

However, even if the companies' books were free, and even if they contained everything that happens in the LSAT prep courses, that still wouldn't be enough.

Why? Because these books don't address the perfectly reasonable questions most of you have. Much of the LSAT's difficulty is not limited to the question-types themselves, but the prep companies fail to address your concerns. LSAT Blog gives you a place to find answers.

Since the big companies have courses in every city and throughout the suburbs, they're afraid of giving away too much info. The companies think: "If we make our retail books too good, students will be able to adequately self-study for the LSAT. Students won't need to take a course, so we'll lose money."

Most people who've taken one of the big prep courses are afraid to admit it, but these courses are a waste of money. Sure, most students who take them see some score improvement. However, any exposure to the LSAT is likely to increase your score, and if you increase your score after the course starts, you lose your eligibility for the money-back guarantee. Plus, you mistakenly attribute your score increase to the prep course instead of to your own natural improvement, and you mistakenly believe the course was a good investment.

Is it any surprise, then, that prep companies recommend students have no exposure to the LSAT prior to starting a course? They're taking credit for score increases students would've gotten anyway. This is shameful and deceitful.

I'm not a big company, so I have nothing to lose. Unlike the big companies, I'm not worried about the day when the amount of info I've put on the blog exceeds that provided by LSAT prep courses. Why? Because many students still desire the personal attention and detail only one-on-one tutoring can provide. A prep class can never match that.

Even if only 1% or 2% of you hire me or take advantage of the low-cost books and videos I've created, that's still more than enough to allow me to pay the rent, get a slice of pizza whenever I want, and keep writing. If the rest of you can't afford to hire a tutor or already have one you like, that's okay too. I'm glad you can benefit even if you never give me a dime.

All I ask is that you rock the LSAT (and if you like what I've created, tell your friends).

Thanks for reading!

-Steve


Free LSAT Prep Tips Outline

UPDATE: If you arrived at here after clicking a link in an old version of my Logic Games Cheat Sheet (one with two columns and the headers "Symbol" and "Meaning), please note that the LSAT Cheat Sheets now available on the blog are far more comprehensive. That PDF was a very old, and much more basic, version of my new LSAT Cheat Sheets.

***

The below list contains links to many of my earliest blog posts.

For a more comprehensive list, see my best articles of all time on:

Logic Games

Logical Reasoning

Reading Comprehension


***


Logic Games

5 Ways to Solve Logic Games in Under 7 Minutes

10 Hardest LSAT Logic Games

7 LSAT Logic Games Repeated on Future PrepTests

How I Learned to Love LSAT Logic Games

Scratch Paper on LSAT Logic Games?

How to Ace LSAT Logic Games | 7 Habits

Conditional Reasoning: Contrapositive, Mistaken Reversal, Mistaken Negation

5 Reasons I Secretly Enjoy Logic Games


Logical Reasoning

7 Logical Reasoning Tips and Tricks

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love LSAT Logical Reasoning

5 Hardest LSAT Logical Reasoning Questions, Explained

How to Ace LSAT Logical Reasoning | 7 Habits

15 Common LSAT Logical Reasoning Topics

5 Steps to Solving Strengthen Logical Reasoning Questions

Formal vs. Informal Logic in Logical Reasoning

5 Steps to Solving Weaken Logical Reasoning Questions


Reading Comprehension

10 Strategies for LSAT Reading Comprehension

How I Learned to Love LSAT Reading Comp
How to Ace LSAT Reading Comp | 7 Habits


Writing Sample

How to Prepare for the LSAT Writing Sample


Recommended Books

Best LSAT Prep Books

All (free) LSAT PrepTests

Answer Keys to LSAT PrepTests

Best Law School Admissions Books


Study Schedules

Is 10 Hours in a Single Day Too Much to Study for the LSAT?

Daily LSAT Schedule Recommendations


Questions and Answers

February 2009 LSAT | Questions and Answers

June 2009 LSAT | Questions and Answers

September 2009 LSAT | Questions and Answers


Test Day

10 Tips to Prepare for the Day of the LSAT

3 Tips to Prepare the Day Before and Day of

LSAT Test Center Ratings and Reviews

LSAT Proctors, Test Center Reviews, and Test-Taking Strategies

Hardest LSAT: Feb, June, Oct, or Dec?

LSAC's Rules for Changing Your LSAT Test Date


Retaking the LSAT

Should You Retake the LSAT? 7 Ways to Decide.

How to Study for a Retake (or what to do when you run out of PrepTests)

5 Reasons Not to be Discouraged by a Low LSAT Score


Better Know a Law School

Virginia Law (Jason Wu Trujillo)

UC Berkeley (Boalt Hall) (Edward Tom)

University of Michigan (Sarah Zearfoss)

Cornell Law (Richard Geiger)


Other Interviews

Stephen Luebke (LSAC Test Specialist). It's not actually an interview, but close enough.

Ann Levine (admission consultant)

Linda Abraham (admission consultant)

Dr. Deborah Bennett (author of Logic Made Easy)

Anna Ivey (admission consultant)

Ben Taibleson (Yale Law Journal Editor-in-Chief)

Ursula Furi-Perry (author of Law School Revealed)

How NOT to Prepare for the LSAT (my guest post on Study Hacks)


LSAT Diaries

The 20-Something File Clerk
The 30-Something Chemist with a Family

LSAT Logic In...

LSAT Logic in Alice in Wonderland

LSAT Logic in the NYTimes

LSAT Logic in The Economist


Things to ReadLaw School Admissions Index: LSAT vs. GPA

LSAC's Official Guide to Law Schools

Law School Rankings Released by US News


Daily LSAT Question via Email, Phone / Twitter, and RSS

1st post about LSAT Tweet

2nd post about LSAT Tweet


Miscellaneous
10 Easy Ways to Increase Your LSAT Score

Why You Can't Improve Your LSAT Score

Correlation Between SAT and LSAT Scores?

5 Reasons to Stay Motivated During LSAT Prep

5 Ways to Win the Hearts of Law School Admissions Deans

7 Warning Signs It's Time to Find a New LSAT Instructor

Why the LSAT is Like Monopoly

LSAT Reading Comprehension Passages: Easy As Harry Potter

LSAT Reading Comprehension doesn't have to put you to sleep.

"Yeah, right," you say.

"I read Harry Potter on the beach a few summers ago. But LSAT Reading Comp? That's like reading Nietzsche or Derrida - even in translation, they don't make sense!"


That's what they WANT you to think.

LSAC wants you to see the passages and say to yourself:







But, actually, Reading Comp passages are more like Harry Potter or See Spot Run than like either philosopher's books.

You probably think I'm full of it. I know where you're coming from.

LSAT Reading Comp consists of 3 long passages and 2 short ones.

Topics cover a broad range:

* humanities
* science
* social science
* law/politics

LSAC figures you're bound to hate one of these areas.

Even worse, you might have a tough time in the areas you do like. Why? Because your real-world (outside) knowledge of the topic can help and hurt you.

Outside knowledge helps because it gives you familiarity with the passage's subject. This can prevent you from falling asleep and can help you distinguish between the viewpoints.

Outside knowledge hurts because you can't use it to answer the questions. Don't let it distract you!

Read quickly, but don't skim.

What do I mean by this?

When most people think of skimming, they think of reading on a superficial level. They try some silly strategy like reading the first and last sentence of each paragraph. Hey, if it worked for grammar school textbooks and the SAT, it'll work here, right?

Wrong.

This isn't grammar school. The LSAT's not going to bake you cookies or read you a bedtime story.

LSAT Reading Comp passages are organized differently than textbooks (or SAT passages), and they have a different focus.

You want to read quickly, but you don't want to skip the middle of a paragraph just because it's the middle. The LSAT often includes important nuggets in the middle of passages because people tend to gloss over them.

Read slightly slower than a typical skim, but faster than a thorough read.

You're not reading for content or facts. Instead, you're reading for argumentative structure and for the positions and viewpoints presented.

The bottom line: don't try to absorb all the content.

If you know the structure, you'll know where to find each nugget of info in the passage when the questions ask for it.


How to Look for a Passage's Structure

As you're quickly reading each passage, look for the following (and consider marking the passage next to where each appears with my suggested notations below):

Viewpoint 1 = V1
Viewpoint 2 = V2

Evidence for V1 = E1
Evidence for V2 = E2

Advocates of V1 = A1
Advocates of V2 = A2

These are the only things worth marking on the passage.

Not every passage will contain all of these. Some passages will not describe the advocates of each viewpoint, but passages generally contain the other parts of the structure.

Note: Some passages have more than 2 viewpoints.


How to Stay Engaged as You Read

If you don't care what happens to Harry Potter at the end of each book (or where Spot ends up after we see him run), getting through each book would probably take forever.

I haven't actually read Harry Potter in years, but here's an incredibly oversimplified version of the story. I'll ignore all the details and treat it like an LSAT Reading Comprehension passage (and brace myself for the emails from rabid Harry Potter fans).

Viewpoint 1 = Forces of good should win.
Viewpoint 2 = Forces of evil should win.

Evidence for V1 = Everyone would be miserable if forces of evil won. Things are good as they are.
Evidence for V2 = Humans are soft, and wizards would be better off if used powers for evil.

Advocates of V1 = Harry Potter and his friends
Advocates of V2 = Voldemort

If you remained engaged as you read Harry Potter, it's probably because you cared about which viewpoint ultimately wins out.

Pretend the LSAT's reading comprehension passages are just as fun. Convince yourself you want to read these passages and you care about which viewpoint has more support.

Law school reading can be just as boring as Reading Comprehension passages, if not more so. It's important to start convincing yourself you like this stuff now.

***

Want more Reading Comp tips? Check out these posts:

10 Strategies for LSAT Reading Comprehension

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the LSAT (Part 3 of 3)