UPDATE: The December 2010 LSAT Curve has been added to my raw score conversion charts (it's PrepTest 62).***
Good luck to everyone taking the December 2010 LSAT!
Did you know that December exams historically have the most lenient curves?
The "curve" on last year's December exam was pretty generous. It allowed 14 incorrect answers to get a 170. (The average for December exams in recent years was only 11.375 incorrect answers).
The below chart contains recent data regarding the number of questions you could get wrong on recent exams and still achieve a particular scaled score (out of 180):
(See what it's taken to get an LSAT score of 160 or 170 on all LSAT PrepTests.)
Come back after you take the LSAT and post your curve predictions in the comments!
Photo by blprnt_van
Where's the February curve? =(
ReplyDeleteThis just helped me delay a complete meltdown. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering if the generosity of 61's curve will have any effect on the curve of 62.
ReplyDeleteGlad I picked December!
ReplyDeleteDoesn't a more lenient curve indicate a harder exam? Aww man.
ReplyDeleteWOW..that was overall brutality. RCom, the Comparisson Passages AC were tough, and those LG..wtf wtf wtf..
ReplyDeletethis exam was fucking awful. i was fine up and through section three, but then lost a lot of time during section 4 because i miscalculated time on the clock. this was my second attempt, and so i cxled my score. i found your blog today, and should definitely not be thinking about february for another day or too, but i already feel more confident about it.
ReplyDeleteMy limited evidence points toward the December 2010 LSAT probably having a strong curve, because all of the handful of folks who I talked with on the way to the parking lot were saying "wow, that Games section........"
ReplyDeleteWas it me or were the games much harder than the rest of the test as a whole?
ReplyDeleteAgree with latest commenter.
ReplyDeleteAll around I thought that was terrible.
ReplyDeleteGames were definitely tough - but anybody who took a close look at the last 3 or 4 tests should've been able to anticipate that. I thought the RC was a little difficult too but the LR sections I found very easy.
ReplyDeleteOverall I'm glad its over and I want to say thanks to Steve for putting together this blog. It helped me a lot over the last 6 months and while my gut tells me I didn't get that 170 I was hoping for, hopefully I didn't miss by too much.
I had trouble with even the first game. By the time I got to the 3rd I was just guessing.
ReplyDeleteThat 8 question logic game was killer. The two sequencing games weren't tough, but the grouping game was a medium difficulty.
ReplyDeleteI HATED the stained glass windows logic game.
ReplyDeleteI had two logic games - one set was really easy, the other I thought was pretty tough (in comparison to PT 60/59/55/52). I destroyed the easy section (I assume it to be the EXP), and I got crushed pretty bad on the section that contained "Stained Glass". Hoping for 10 or 11 out of 23...
ReplyDeletethe logic games section killed me. stained glass game sucked up all of my time
ReplyDelete98 percent of all who speak of the games claim it was very hard. This is good for the group as a whole. It is relative. Can anyone advise how many questions can be a 150,160 on a generous curve?
ReplyDeletemy boyfriend just got back and said the games section was awful!!!!!! He usually scores in the 170s so I think you all are going to be ok. I hope the "curve" serves you all well! Good Luck :)
ReplyDeleteWow. Glad it wasn't just me: yup,tough LGs. Did anyone else get one easy and one pretty tough RC section?
ReplyDeleteI had 2 RC's also. I actually thought the non-Exp one was easier for some reason. Probably because it came RIGHT BEFORE the experimental, and at that point I was pretty mentally drained.
ReplyDeleteHoping for no more than -12 on games. That was ridiculous
My sections went RC LR RC LG LR. The first RC must have been experimental because the answers were way too easy. I didn't think the second RC was especially hard, but it just seemed more like the ones in the past. That LG section was the hardest I've seen. I usually go -2- -4 on LG and I will be lucky to have gone -10. Screwed up my whole test/goal.
ReplyDeleteYou guys have all helped me from having a meltdown. I have been studying the games for 6 months straight and was totally floored when there was no room to write on the first one. It was a really hard section...and I thought I was missing something on the stained glass so good to know it was tough for everyone. Good luck to everyone!!
ReplyDeleteI got the two RC's too... LR-RC-RC-LR-LG....Was the Einstein passage in the 2nd or 3rd section... and how do you know that it was experimental? I was under the impression that experimental sections are typically harder... I thought the first RC section was more difficult because of the passages use of language and structure.....that's why i thought the first RC was experimental
ReplyDeleteI can't remember if Einstein was in the first or second one. I can't remember anything except that I guessed on 12 q's on the LG.
ReplyDeleteThese comments make me nervous since I thought the games went really well for me.. perhaps not haha..
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone remember any of the passages in the non-experimental RC?... I can't figure out which is is which
I don't know if it was test anxiety, but i found my first section (args) to be so tedious that i couldn't find a good pace...Did anyone else find one of the arguments section to be more difficult than the other? I don't know how many i even guessed on... I was in a haze... but the second arguments section, i know i rocked... the glass game did suck, but even though i managed through, it didn't leave me any time for the last game.... Sucks because i was scoring consistently in the 160's prior to today on practice tests, but i feel uncomfortable about the results for this test.... FML!
ReplyDeleteThe reading experimental was the harder one. The one with teeth passage was real. Also the games were harder than average, the window one and enployees kicked my butt...Hopefully they will take that the games were harder than normal into consideration while doing the curve. LR was average also. Good luck to everyone.
ReplyDeleteI had LR, LR, RC, LR, LG.
ReplyDeleteAnyone know which one was the non-exp LR?
And I thought the RC was kinda hard ><, usually my best but I missed at least 4-5.
And LG killed me as well.
I studied diligently and religiously for four months using Steve's method, typically scoring ~170 and missing no more than 2-3 in each LG section in my last month of studying, am really good at budgeting my time, etc...and two of today's four LGs DESTROYED me. Lets all hope for a generous curve...
ReplyDeleteI too usually miss -2- -4 at the most on LG and today guessed on 10 between games 2 and 3. I will need a huge curve and alot of help from the guessing Gods to even do 160.
ReplyDeletecan anyone recall which other passages were with the tooth decay one?
ReplyDeleteand yes, i didn't feel confident about any of the logic games.
The fisrt LR was the real one with 26questions, the second had 25 and was the experimental. RC was harder than average I thought. Also it seems like LG messed alot of people up, so I am glad it was not just myself.
ReplyDeleteDoes the EXP ever come first? Or is it completely random?
ReplyDeletethe EXP is always one of the first three, it could come first.
ReplyDeleteFWIW - 102 questions in total.
ReplyDeleteI had 2 RCs and I don't remember an Einstein passage, unless I've blanked it out already.
ReplyDeleteAny idea which one was the experimental? My RCs were the 1st and 3rd sections, so I have no clue.
Also, glad to hear the LGs were hard for everyone. I did only the first and last games because sequencing games are easiest for me, though I kept getting caught up on a couple of questions in the last game. I guessed on the middle two (I took one look at the stained glass thing and marked D's all the way down).
Same commenter from 9:36 - basically I'm hoping that the RC that ended with the passage on the feminist writers wasn't the real one because I badly budgeted my time and had to speed read that one in the last five minutes. The first section is a tough one for me - I'm usually really rattled in the first few minutes of the test.
ReplyDeleteLG is usually my strength (I normally get all correct, at most 2 wrong). But today's test was a disaster. My brain just didn't move since I didn't get any sleep after 3 am this morning. So I guessed a lot on game 2 and 3.
ReplyDeleteI also have two RC (section 2 and 3). Which one do people think is experimental? The one with perfume (section 3 in my testbook)?
To comment on other's questions regarding RC. I think the Einstein was in my section 3 with the perfume one. The tooth decay was in my section 2 with the fermine writer. I found section 2 is easier, but had no clue which is experimental? Any help?
ReplyDeletesection 2 was the real one for you, I only had one RC
ReplyDeleteI just wanna repeat what Sarah above said. I got the same sort of scores in my practice tests (~170) and today's Stained Glass and Godamn Employees games just SHREDDED my entire test. Bah! :-(
ReplyDelete--J
The order of the test I had was LR LR RC LR LG. I think the first section, the LR was the experimental section, as it was really hard and time consuming. The LG were tough too, but I was expecting that so it came as no surprise. The stain glass game sucked.
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone know when we can get access to the testbook online? I need that to estimate how bad I did and decide whether to cancel the score.
ReplyDeleteUgh - I don't remember the Einstein or perfume ones, but I do remember the tooth decay and feminist writer, so I guess the one I had to rush through was the real one. OF COURSE. I hope I read everything correctly in my haste.
ReplyDeleteThe RC I liked and wished had counted had a passage about an African American actor and something about measuring earthquakes - at least I think those were in the same section. Is it possible they had different experimental RCs on different exams?
Anon at 8:25 - you can't, at least not in any way that wouldn't violate the LSAC rules. That is so not worth the risk of being barred from law school.
ReplyDeleteI had the tooth decay and feminist writer as well as the section about earthquakes. My Games section was right after the break and I feel like I cracked open the stained glass one pretty quickly. Hopefully I can pull off a good score!
ReplyDeleteI took the LSAT a second time yesterday and felt the entire test was going so well....until I got to that last awful logic games section. I guessed on probably 11/23 questions, on those two middle games... I got a 166 last time and I cant decide whether I should cancel..?
ReplyDeleteThe RC on the Earthquakes was the real deal. (After the test, I found out the girl next to me also had two RC's. My buddy behind me only had one, which was the Earthquake one).
ReplyDeleteThe RC with the Novelist/Jewitt was the experimental.
I had RC, LR, RC, LG, LR.
I thought games 1 and 4 were okay. The unusual thing about the 1st game was the amount of space - virtually none. However, I had seen that before in one of the 50's practice exams.
I also guessed in games 2-3....WOW....killers.
Please help me remember the four scoring RC passages.
ReplyDeleteMeasuring lichen (or whatever name) for earthquake, tooth decay, custom-made images in court, femine writer. Am I correct or I mix some with passages in experimental RC?
Earthquake, Medical Sketches, Decay (Comparative), Feminine Writer.
ReplyDeleteNice tautologies! ;)
ReplyDeleteHey all, I took the LSAT abroad in Europe, and don't remember any earthquake passage or stained glass window game. Is it possible that LSAC releases a different version for test takers abroad, or maybe I was just so fried after the test that I'm not remembering correctly?
ReplyDeleteOverseas people take a completely different test.
ReplyDeletelove how we are all anonymous lol...
ReplyDeleteLSAT games was terrible, but did anyone else have an incredibly annoying peson in the room??
I was at a small private university so there was only 24 ppl in my room, one guy kept asking questions and came in there with a LOUD McDonalds theme colored shirt on and red leather boots as if he was going to latin night after the test.
Soon as he gets there he says, "can we use scratch paper"
Damn stained glass game......ruined that whole section for me!!!!!! ARRRGGHHH
ReplyDeletePersonally, I thought the stained glass game was fairly straightforward. Or perhaps it was simply a case of my being entirely comfortable with my oblivious stupidity!
ReplyDeleteI only had one RC (very first section) and two logic games... The RC was earthquakes, tooth decay, medical sketches, novelist/poetry thing... I felt so good after the LG experimental only to have that feeling crushed by the stained glass/employee games... damn them!
ReplyDeleteTo Anonymous LSAT guy in Europe:
ReplyDeleteHey there. I also took the test in Europe (London). I have no recollection of a stained glass game either, but I did have a hard time on the games.
I also took the LSAT in Dec 2009 and I'm certain the RC section 5 I took is not in the Official Preptest for Dec 2009.
So I do wonder if either the experimental can be #5 or if we in Europe take a completely different test. (Maybe one recycled from a past February test?).
But I do remember an Einstein reference on one of the RC passages. It dealt with dark energy and the expanding universe. Einstein was not the central focus of the passage.
-anonymous UK LSAT guy
Everyone is complaining about the stained glass game. I didn't have a problem with any game except the rule change question in the last one and the third game about conferences I think. Both games (glass and conferences) were heavy on deductions and I just couldn't make any about the conferences.
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking the curve will be greater than -12 since it was a harder exam than the October exam. I'm hoping for a -14 like Dec. 2009, maybe more but I don't really think we'd ever get lucky.
ReplyDeleteI found the the two LR sections to be fairly strait forward and slight easier than average. The RC wasn't too bad either. The games section on the other hand was quite difficult (whoever wrote stained glass can die in a fire!). I found the same inference as the guy posting at 12:10 but at a huge cost of time. I normally score around 160-165 on practice tests and feel I missed ~20 on this one. I've read here (8:22pm) and elsewhere suggesting this test had 102 questions, can anyone confirm or deny this?
ReplyDeleteif the test had more questions, is the curve easier?
ReplyDeleteI don't know about all this speculation about the test being harder. Really, I don't think it was. The folks wishing and hoping for -13 or less could be very disappointed, indeed, and should prepare themselves for such, just in case. After all, there are four weeks (-ish) 'til scores are released - adequate time to prepare oneself for disappointment! (I know I'll be disappointed if I get less than 174.)
ReplyDeleteDo they curve the test as a whole or by section?
ReplyDeleteHey London dude, I took the test in Europe as well, and do remember the Einstein question. I don't think the stained glass question was on our test though, so we must have had a different logic games section at least. Our test had 101 questions (27RC, 23LG, 26LR, 25LR). I'm not sure that they would recycle questions from an undisclosed February test, because what if someone had taken that test before? Wouldn't that provide the chance, however small, for a handicap for some people? But then again, I suppose they run that risk all the time with the experimental sections.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I wonder how the European curve will compare with the American one. My guess is that it will be slightly harder than the US one since their logic games section seemed pretty awful.
I'll never look at a church the same way after that stained glass game. My order was LR RC LR LR LG. Worst LG EVER!
ReplyDeleteMy RC had dental caries, lychenometry, a female author item, and can't remember the 4th.
Looking forward to an explanation on the blog!
What's going to make the difference on this exam is who hit the two LR and one RC sections out of the park as opposed to just missing 2 or 3. Those who aced these can afford the questions that will be lost from stained glass and conferences.
ReplyDeleteIt sucks thinking back because it's really hard to decipher how you did just based on a feeling.
I guessed on several of the LG questions after being thrown off by the stained glass question.
ReplyDeleteProbably only got 9-10 questions total for the section.
Then I went home and blew through 3 different 23-question LG practice sections, timed, and only missed a total of 5 questions.
So I guess I proved to myself that I can do logic games. Just not when a stained glass type of question F's up the entire section for me.
Screw the Dec 2010 LSAT.
Hey European Anonymous 8:48,
ReplyDeleteI think our LG section was pretty hard too. I thought the 1st 2 games were hard, and although I understood them, they took longer than normal for me.
The second 2 games were horrific. I half-understood #3 and I started #4 with 5 mins left. I guessed all D for the last 4 questions. (Please tell me that you solved #4 and the last answers were all D's!). BTW, I studied games hard and considered it my best section until test day.
So basically, I dont think the European test was a walk in the park by any means. We deserve a lenient PT 59-style curve too!
Final Point: Regarding guessing D when you don't know an answer, I think LSAC might be using D less often. Maybe I'm imagining things, but I think that on the most recent tests, D's are much less likely to be found in the final 4 or 5 Q's of any section than they used to be in the good old days (PT 19-40). Perhaps LSAC knows that we know D is overrepresented in the last couple Q's and they want to stop people from gaining points by guessing. Such a strategem would be fully in line with their reputation for wanton cruelty.
great. They're on to the D's.
ReplyDeleteThere goes my December LSAT.
To the person who said "The RC with the Novelist/Jewitt was the experimental." you are wrong.
ReplyDeleteI had one RC section and that was there.
Agreed - That was my interpretation, and I believe that was VERY tricky.
ReplyDeleteI had LR RC LR LR LG...my first LR was really hard and I'm hoping it was the experimental. I also found the RC to be harder than the usual...does anyone know if section 1 LR was the experimental section? This will determine whether or not I cancel my score. Thanks!!!
ReplyDeleteThe order of the exp sec varies; you can only tell by the questions. i.e. the children climbing stairs / ladders is one of the real lr's.
ReplyDelete...okay...I remember the children climbing the ladder as one of the arguments. I just don't remember if it was in the first half of the exam or the second half, which was my section 4....??
ReplyDeleteSection 4 & 5 (after the break) are always *real* - in case you were not aware...
ReplyDeletethe LSAT's are so much fun
ReplyDeletethis exam better have a humongous curve or lsac just hates us
ReplyDeleteFor those who had RC-LR-RC-LG-LR:
ReplyDeleteWe know that earthquakes/medical sketches/tooth decay/feminine writer was the real deal, but does anyone remember if that was our first or third section? I'm pretty sure it was the first...
Also, I hardly remember the feminine writer passage...anyone recall any details that can jog my memory? Thanks!
haha I remember what I bubbled for that question specifically because the question was haunting me. I just could not figure out what the answer was for the life of me.
ReplyDeletethe feminine writer passage had to do with comparing that writer to previous domestic writers who wrote about children yada yada. does that help at all?
I was hoping for a 160 but I'd be lucky to get a 150... Logic Games definitely got me, although the second section wasn't so bad (don't remember the questions in it, but it had a simple sequencing set)
ReplyDeleteWorst part was I didn't know that the sections would be all mixed up. So I assumed that section 5 was going to be experimental but then it was an LR section so I thought to myself, okay, this isn't the experimental one. It would've been one of the previous ones.
Some things that I would avoid for a test in the future:
1) Glancing at my watch (which was right in front of me) too many times
2) Letting myself wander off when I was stuck in a question
3) Not skipping hard questions immediately when I knew they would take up a lot of time
4) Going to my company party the night before just because I felt obliged to (even though I left at 10pm!! - and there was loud music and dancing so that might have affected my performance)
Now I'm praying that my score won't affect my applications as badly as I anticipate them to.
Anyone remember how many questions there are for game 2 (stained glass) and game 3 (employees going to different talks)? I need to estimate how bad that will affect me. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAnon at 10:18-
ReplyDeleteRe: feminine writer...Yes, that sort of helps, thanks. I think that was the passage I saved for the last 5 minutes, scanned it, and guessed on the questions. I hope there weren't more than 5 or 6 for that one...
Will somebody just please put me out of my misery and tell me my score?
Is anyone considering canceling their scores because of the logic games section? I had 2 logic games, did really well on the first one and guessed on about 7 questions on the second one. Logic games were really helping my score, I only missed between 2-4 on practice exams. This is the 2nd time I've taken it, the first time around I did not get a score I am happy with.... I'm wondering if I should cancel my score or risk having 3 scores in 2 years???
ReplyDeleteHELP?
To Anonymous @ 9:52 am, I am quite sure that a cancellation still counts towards one of the three tries in 2 years... Only absences don't count. So might as well wait and see what you scored.
ReplyDelete**#'s of q's in passages/games aren't the same as answers**
ReplyDeleteAnyone remember the question breakdown for RC?
Lichens--7 questions
Medical illustrations-- ?
Caries-- ?
Jewett-- ?
total=27
LSAC prohibits discussion, including the so-called “postmortem” discussion of test questions immediately after a particular test administration, because it has the potential to affect the fairness of the LSAT and the law school admission process. This thread has been logged and appropriate action may be taken.
ReplyDeleteCaveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.
I'll be thrilled with a 150. Seriously.
ReplyDeleteTo follow a 6-month study schedule, feel confident going in, and then end up with this exam... can't help but feel like I've wasted 6 months of my life becoming "good" at something for so little return.
The test did have 102. RC 27, LR 26, RC 27, LG 23, LR 26. I froze on the second game as well but got it (eventually). LR seemed deceptively simple as did RC. I usually ace games so that's why I was not overjoyed. Seeing most others agree I can breathe more easily. Thanks guys/gals.
ReplyDeleteEveryone, please refrain from discussing unreleased test questions and answers. I've deleted all comments that appeared to be inappropriate and will continue to do so.
ReplyDeleteEither way, I'm done with the LSAT. I spent way too much time and money over the past 6 months on this crap. If I 160, I 160. If I 120, I 120.
ReplyDeleteThis exam has taken up enough of my life.
RC LR RC LG LR
ReplyDeleteBefore I read this thread, I was feeling pretty confident about the stained glass game in spite of the fact that i guessed on two questions(educated guess). However, because of that game, I was only able to finish 3/4 games.
RC seemed easy, but now I am thinking it was deceptively easy. The first LR was not bad. By the last LR I was mentally drained so my performance is up in the air.
My test was LR RC RC (exp.) - LR LG. I retook this test because I blew two sections on the October test (LG and RC - the latter is usually my strongest). I just can't seem to not freak out when I do LG sections on the actual LSAT. I have improved so much in that section and spent a lot of time over the last 5 weeks on LG and have improved a lot (I even timed myself so that I only had 5 minutes to do most games, and was solving most questions correctly). I blew this games section. It was hard. I didn't think the stained glass game was sooo bad, but now I'm haunted by it. The employee/seminar question absolutely killed me. Whatever. I didn't think that RC was too bad, and I found the LR to be much easier than October's. So, even if my terrible LG score doesn't improve, my other sections should. I'm just so glad to know that we are all on the same page: The Logic Games SUCKED. But..we're done. And for those of those considering testing again, taking it twice really wasn't a big deal (and I mean it).
ReplyDeleteI had two RCs but don't know which one was experimental. Nor do I remember which passages were grouped with each other. I do remember that the first RC (section 1) screwed me, whereas I finished the second one (section 3) with time to spare.
ReplyDeleteDoes someone who only had ONE RC section please recall which four subjects the non-experimental RC section contained? I think I bombed the real ones but overwhelmed the experimental. :(
Does anyone remember what the last of the 4 LG questions was about? I can't remember that one for the life of me!
ReplyDeleteAnyone with a combination of LR RC LR LR LG? If so, do you remember how many questions were in the first LR????? Thanksss!
ReplyDeleteHi. Someone who had 2 LR sections please confirm this (since it is slowly driving me crazy) but was there a dinosaur question towards the end of one of your LR sections?
ReplyDeleteNope, no dinosaur. It was an alligator.
ReplyDeleteWas the alligator question around question number 25 then? Maybe I really confused alligator with dinosaur.
ReplyDeletePretty sure we're not allowed to discuss that. Sorry, dude!
ReplyDeleteThanks anyway. I really do feel like I was hallucinating certain questions.
ReplyDeleteI had 2 LG's. I did OK on the first and bombed on the 2nd and real one. I've never done so poorly on an LG. I screwed up my setup on the 1st question, freaked out at the lack of space, ended up guessing on almost every question. What a disaster.
ReplyDeleteThe other sections put my at about a 160+ level. But, the games might have brought me down to a 150-. I'm glad it's over and I'm glad I'll have half of my law school apps being decided based on this exam. The rest, I'll submit after February's test. I'm less depressed after reading some of these responses. Still, it's my bed that I made, so I have to take responsibility. Next time, I'll remember to skip the 1st question in LG if it's hard, just in case #2, 3 or 4 turn out to be easy. The four-part advice from anon above is definitely good.
Best of luck to everyone. But, I'm more convinced now that ever that we need to terminate the LSAT. This is far too traumatic when our academic record and life experience should be the real measuring sticks.
I agree with the last comment. If the LSAT is so effective for law school preparation then why are so many L1 students dropping out willfully and many others are getting the boot. The LSAT should be testing our abilities to be good counselors, not our suicide probability rates.
ReplyDeleteThe stained glass game has me wishing people could not cancel their scores... I need them in this curve! Anyone else notice the entities for that game were GO PRY as in go pray, punk test writers.
ReplyDeleteLSAT Amnesia
ReplyDeleteAs with most of the practice tests I took I could not remember a single question after the test. I just know that I was flying high at the break, having always had trouble with lg I did really well on that section. Everyone else looked very nervous at the break and I was just looking at them with "who peed in your lemonade" eyes.
Then it happened, I went back into the auditorium and opened the book to Sec 4 & blamo another lg section. FFFFFFFFFFFunnn. I jumped out of my body for at least 2 min and then did the best I could maybe answering 12 and getting 8 right. Stained Glass, I don't remember any of that so that was probably part of my long guess list.
The confusion cont into sec. 5 where I could do nothing but think of Sec. 4 and how I was done. Oh well, I will take it like a champ and deal with whatever the outcome is but that was a low blow LSAC. My sec went LR RC LG LG LR. I do remember that.
P.s. My Colombian gf is sitting next to me and I busted out laughing with the comment about "latin night". I read it to her and she just had a puzzled look on her face. As I did after I thought about it, I don't quite get the tie in but hey that may be a common belief in whatever small town you come from. I am guessing you are from that background bc of the comment and the private univ. with 24 people taking the test. There were 300 or so taking the exam here. Some quick advice to you loco and that would be to ease up on the stereotypes, especially if you are planning on going to law school in a metropolitan area. To answer your question before you ask it, she was not puzzled bc it was in English, just bc of the comment itself.
Guys this is a standardized test. All LSATs administered since June/1991 are equivalent. Additionally, there were harder games than the games on prep test 62.
ReplyDeleteTo the guy who made the comment about Latin Night...? I'm Latin and I find your comment offensive!
ReplyDeleteHeed some advice from the guy with the colombian girlfriend.
so when are those darn scores going to be released????????????????
ReplyDeleteIt was a multiple choice test... why don't I my test results back 3 1/2 weeks later? Could that be an indication of how badly everyone did and a strong curve because everyone did so miserably that it is an embarrassment to LSAC?
ReplyDeleteIs this some kind of cruel joke?
ReplyDeleteJust got mine. Las Vegas @ 4:00PM. Missed my low ideal by one point.
ReplyDeleteI am soo tired of LSAT. I think I am going to apply and risk it. I don't have the energy to take it again.
Ha, 169. Just as I predicted in this thread on test date. Good for 97th percentile though - and the end of the LSAT for me.
ReplyDeleteThanks again Steve for this blog. Don't know where I would've been without it!
I missed 3 and still got a 180. Is this for real? Ridiculous curve.
ReplyDelete