I just made a video explanation for the second LSAT Logic Game from LSAT PrepTest 62 (December 2010 LSAT). It's the "stained glass windows" game (colors: green, orange, purple, rose, and yellow).
I explained all questions in one video that's just over 11 1/2 minutes. (Get more free LSAT videos.)
Enjoy!
***
For more, see my more-detailed written Logic Games explanations available on the blog.
I explained all questions in one video that's just over 11 1/2 minutes. (Get more free LSAT videos.)
Enjoy!
***
For more, see my more-detailed written Logic Games explanations available on the blog.
I have a bit of a problem with the setup of this diagram and don't exactly understand how you got to all of these assumptions. I guess I either read it wrong or am having difficulty understanding as the question states: "if a window does not contain purple glass, then that window contains orange glass." Nowhere does that state that if it does have purple glass you can't have orange glass, and nowhere does it state that if it does have orange glass you can't have purple glass. Do you mind explaining how you got to this assumption please?
ReplyDelete