LSAT cram courses - yea or nah?

To be honest, I never took an LSAT prep course.

Back when I was studying, the only options were $1,000-$1,500 (!!!) and didn't work with my schedule. I didn't want to give up my weekends or go to a 3-hour class after a long day of work, and I didn't want to spend all that money.

(I did hire a tutor once, but he made me feel like an idiot. Part of me worried the same thing would happen in a prep class with other people - which would be even worse!)

BUT...

I do work with a lot of students who come to me after they've taken courses, and I also get emails asking about courses.

Including a recent one asking:


"Should I take a course that ends right before the test?"


*** MY RESPONSE ***
From what I've seen, most people fall behind with the homework during prep courses.

And it's also good to let things digest.

A lot of these courses try to cram EVERYTHING into a couple dozen hours, and they're geared towards people working full-time.

This means courses are usually at night when you're already tired.

So, if you take a course, give yourself plenty of time after it ends to review things on your own before you take the test.

Thing is, this all depends on whether you have time to study more after the course ends.

In general, I recommend spending at least some time looking at LSAT books before deciding whether to take a course. It's worth thinking about whether self-study might be a better idea before dropping a large chunk of change.

Por ejemplo....

if you have no experience with this stuff, but "hate, hate, hate Reading Comp," keep in mind that most courses spend less time on RC (less demand for courses to cover it) and more time on other sections. They also tend to speed through Logical Reasoning because they want to cover all the question-types, but they just don't have enough time to do it properly.


One of the reasons I created my own courses was to avoid all these issues. You can just work through everything at your own pace when it's most convenient for you. And you can watch (and re-watch) course videos until you understand each topic fully.

But if you do decide to take one of those in-person courses, and -

if you want to know WHAT to do in those weeks after the course ends...

here's a technique borrowed from my LSAT course:
I recommend spending most of that time doing full-length tests, starting with a few 4-section tests, and then several 5-section tests.

To avoid burnout, space out full-length timed PrepTests (like not doing 2 in one day, and not doing full-lengths 2 days in a row.)

It's annoying that LSAC only publishes 4-section tests and doesn't give people an experimental section.

A lot of people wonder where to get the 5th section, and some people just don't bother with it.

But I don't see any reason you can't (for example) do PrepTests 84, 85, 86, and 87 as full-length 5-section timed exams by splicing in one section from PrepTest 83 into each of each of those.

(I actually recommend something along these lines in my study schedules.)

Anyway, enough about courses - let's move on to one of my least favorite things, addressing your complaints - (I know I should ignore them, but can't help arguing - guess it's that LSAT / lawyer mentality)

Some people have gotten annoyed with me for analyzing real-world situations "LSAT-style." They say it's "filler," that I should spend my time ONLY talking about LSAT problems and concepts.

Thing is, some of you tell me you prefer the real world analyses because you haven't really started studying and just want to dip your toes in the murky LSAT waters.

If I write articles and emails referring to PrepTest XX, Section X, Question XX, many people won't be able to follow along because they don't have their books yet.

I try to respect LSAC's copyright even though I'd be using the LSAT questions for educational purposes. Bottom line: I don't EVER publish actual LSAT questions without LSAC's permission...


Also, I talk and think about the LSAT for about 99% of my waking hours, so it's nice for me to take a break from that but still give you some useful LSAT mindset tips.


More important, though, is most students tell me they like a mix with both LSAT-specific info AND drills that have real-world examples.


So, if you're one of those people who has a problem with me being an actual human being...if you want me to be an LSAT robot and just boringly explain LSAT problems 24 hours a day....I have some news for you:

***Too bad.***
Seriously, please just unsubscribe if you have a problem with this. This is a free article where I'm sharing LSAT strategies and other tips --- if I want to occasionally bring in a real-world example, cut me some slack :)



In fact, I'm going to share another real-world example right now:

>>>>>>>>>> I should eat at that restaurant - after all, it has 5 stars on Yelp!






Conclusion: I should eat at that restaurant.

Evidence (indicated by "after all"): it has 5 stars on Yelp!


Try to think of some potential problems with this argument, as well as some related strengtheners or weakeners.

Then take a look at mine and compare :)

...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...


Strengtheners:
- The Yelp reviews are from people who've left lots of other reviews (less likely to be fake).

- My preferences are pretty typical and in line with what most other people like.


Weakeners:
- The Yelp reviews are mostly from people who've only left one or two reviews in the past (more likely to be fake).

- I have weird tastes and usually dislike what other people like.


Notice how each weakener is the opposite of the strengthener - they're kind of like two sides of the same coin :)


Got some questions about diagramming conditional statements recently, so I'll go over those next time :)

And, as always, feel free to reach out with any LSAT stuff you wanna know. I'm a real person and read every message myself.

-Steve Schwartz - LSAT Strengthener



Recommended Resources:

1. LSAT Courses

The best of my LSAT material with exclusive access to attend my Live Online LSAT Master Classes + Q&As, and on-demand video lessons you can watch anytime. Plus, LSAT study plans to keep you on track. Save hundreds of dollars with an LSAT course package.

2. Logical Reasoning Explanations
The explanations that should have come with the LSAT. These don't just fall back on "out of scope," but actually tell you why the wrong answers are wrong, why the right answers are right, and the easiest way to get the correct answer.

3. Logical Reasoning Cheat Sheet
Based on what I'd typically do in college: read what the professor emphasized and condense it all onto a single piece of paper. It gave me a quick reference, making things a lot less threatening and a lot more manageable.



Overseas LSAT vs. North American LSAT + LSAT-India

"Any differences in tests administered in the US and those outside the US? I got another one also about the Asia test? Is there any difference between overseas and North America? I assume there wouldn't be any, but still wanted to ask someone with more expertise just to be sure."

It turns out that there is a difference -- in that it's not the same test form.


If you get a circle game about monkeys, someone in Asia might get a pure sequencing game about clowns - you get yours and they get theirs and there's no overlap.

So the people who are taking the test overseas a month from now, or a week from now, whatever it is, or they're taking the Sabbath observers' tests, it's not as if they're going to get advanced knowledge on the internet from everyone taking it now and everyone taking it on your test date.

So don't worry. Nothing unfair is happening here. The test is exactly the same in nature in that it's meant to be of equal difficulty. They're also going to have one Logic Games section, one Reading Comp section, two Logical Reasoning sections, and the experimental. And they'll also have the 35-minute constraint, and everything else will be pretty much the same. 

As a bit of LSAC trivia, the LSAT-India exam is a little bit different in that that's a test administered for law as an undergrad-level degree. Whereas in North America, the LSAT is used for admission to law as a graduate-level degree and program. So for that reason, the LSAT India only has four answer choices per question, whereas everyone else for the regular grad-level LSAT has five answer choices per question.

So if you ever come across LSAT-India practice exams, you might notice that small difference, but that's pretty much it. One reason LSAC doesn't release every test administered is because they want to save some exams, i.e. some test forms, to use for overseas administrations and to use for Sabbath observers, or if something goes wrong due to the weather and they have to delay by a few weeks.

There's no benefit to taking it one location or another. It really just depends ultimately on which is the best test center for you.

I saw one photo where test-takers in India (taking the LSAT-India) they seemed pretty crammed in small desks very close together.

LSAT India Test Center

Maybe certain test centers in other big cities could be just as crowded and maybe not the nicest facilities. I've heard reports from students taking the LSAT in places like Beijing and Rome, and I've heard reports that those test centers might not be the nicest.

Do your research. There is an advantage to taking the LSAT when your test center is going to be relatively nicer.




"What non-LSAT materials should I read?"

I get this question ALL THE TIME.

And it drives me crazy.

There are DOZENS of released exams - meaning there are HUNDREDS of Reading Comp passages available to you.

Did you read them all yet? If not, you should.

Here's some Tough Love:

Reading The Economist or The Atlantic is fun, but those are WAY easier than LSAT passages. Because they're not PURPOSELY trying to mess with you.

LSAT passages are meant to test your ability to read between the lines - as if you were a lawyer going over a contract (where the other party might be trying to screw you over).

They take everyday writing and purposely BORING-IFY it.


Here's some proof - I looked up their source material for a random passage (Test 30, passage #4), that was ADAPTED from a New York Times book review.

I compared the passage to the original NYTimes article, and saw that NYTimes article included things like:

>>>>>>> Naturally, she would ask, "Do you remember anybody growing rice?"

-and-

>>>>>>> Here is another discussion that I wish the author had placed in the text


You'll never see language that simple in these books.

Boring LSAT Books

If you don't believe me, go check out some actual LSAT passages (p23-31) right now to see how ridiculous they can be!


So, if you have lots of time to study, start with the very oldest and work your way forward. Once you do enough of them, you'll see that they have a specific format --- just like Logic Games.

You could even read a bunch untimed, just to get a sense of how they're constructed - how's that for some lazy beach reading?


For Logical Reasoning, actual Logical Reasoning stimuli are always best (again, start with older ones and move forward), but reading in general on the side can help also, a little - if you don't count it as real "study time."

I like A Rulebook for Arguments in particular. Aside from that, try to make reading a part of your life in general should help with your reading comprehension overall.

Pop-sci books (like Freakonomics and Steven Pinker's work) are chock-full of arguments addressing correlation/causation issues, alternative causes/explanations, etc.

These are great just to increase your comfort level and familiarity with the types of arguments you typically see on the LSAT. The benefit over the long term? Increased speed of comprehension.



Here's another idea:

While actual LSAT PrepTests are still always the best, if you're looking for additional LSAT-style "activities", you could analyze real-world arguments and advertisements, then poke holes in their logic.

Next time, I'll share how I found potential flaws in an advertisement, and how you can do the same.

Logically yours,
Steve


Recommended Resources:

1. LSAT Courses
The best of my LSAT material with exclusive access to attend my Live Online LSAT Master Classes + Q&As, and on-demand video lessons you can watch anytime. Plus, LSAT study plans to keep you on track. Save hundreds of dollars with an LSAT course package.

2. LSAT Day-By-Day Study Plans
Preparing for the LSAT is confusing. There are dozens of prep books and practice tests out there, and 1,000+ articles on my website alone. When, and how, should you use them all? These super-specific study plans give you a clear plan of attack.

3. LSAT Cheat Sheets
Based on what I'd typically do in college: read what the professor emphasized and condense it all onto a single piece of paper. It gave me a quick reference, making things a lot less threatening and a lot more manageable.



LSAT Test Day Food, Bathroom Break, and Clothing

LSAT Test Day Food


What to eat and drink? I would recommend keeping it simple and light the morning of.
For example, oatmeal, eggs, or a banana. Protein is good. Energy bars are totally fine. I wouldn't try anything new on Test Day. I wouldn't eat something that I hadn't ever eaten before - like a bagel with tuna fish immediately upon waking up, for example. That's a really bad idea.

The night before, I would not eat anything too heavy. I would try to keep it light so that you can sleep well. So again, nothing you haven't eaten before. I wouldn't eat too late at night. I wouldn't eat anything especially spicy. I wouldn't go to the all-you-can-eat buffet. None of those things are likely to end well. You want to go to bed early, you want to go to bed on a fairly light stomach, but not being hungry.

As for what to drink the morning of, coffee's fine. If you already drink coffee, don't change anything. Keep with that if it works for you. You don't want to have a caffeine headache. But also keep in mind that coffee is a diuretic, so you don't want anything that will make you have to go to the bathroom too often or for any reason.

LSAT Bathroom Breaks


So that relates also to a question I've gotten about bathroom jitters. “Has any student asked you about bathroom jitters, such as nerves creating the urge to go? Maybe the coffee or water is just doing their thing.”

I get what you mean. Nerves can definitely do that to a person and it's happened to me at times. I would say reduce your coffee, reduce your water, still have what you need. They’re a symptom of a root cause, which is anxiety, and this is normal. So if you can reduce anxiety, you can reduce your bathroom jitters.

So I'd be walking through best case and worst case scenarios, three to five years from now. The more you do that for yourself, the more real you make it, the more your anxiety will diminish because you'll see that the awful negative, your catastrophic outcome that you're envisioning for yourself, isn't necessarily as bad as you think it is and things can turn around for you.

LSAT Dress for Success


If you're worried the room could be too hot or too cold, you might want to think about dressing for comfort overall. For other people, wearing a button-down or a suit and dress shoes might help them feel confidence and going in dressed professionally. For other people that might be really comfortable. For me personally, that would be a bit uncomfortable. And so I wouldn't do that.

I would have loved to wear a hoodie on test day, but they don't permit those. I actually did bring a hoodie when I took the LSAT because I didn’t know about this and I actually had to leave it outside because the proctors wouldn't hold onto it.

But comfort is important. If you want to wear sweatpants or basketball shorts, I think that's perfectly fine. If you want to wear flip flops, totally fine. It's what about whatever works for you.





LSAT Reading Comp, Logic Games, and Logical Reasoning with 5 Minutes Left

"Any strategy in reading comp if I have only five minutes left when I get to the last passage or game?"

If you have five minutes left, you want to go back and attack anything you had difficulty with previously in the section.


So if there's a tough problem you encountered, you weren't sure about, spend a few extra minutes on that.

If you have five minutes left for the last passage or even the last game, your odds obviously are not going to be that high.

(Keep in mind our average amount of time allotted is 8 minutes and 45 seconds.)

You want to attack any general global questions for reading comp. So those would be: main point, primary purpose, passage organization, best title for the passage, author's tone, anything general in nature, those are easier to knock out.

And those are the sorts of things that you want to be knocking out anyway when you're reading the passage for the first time. That's what you want to walk away with. 

If you had five minutes left when you got to the last logic game, that's a very different story. In that case, you want to make your main diagram, answer any orientation questions, then answer any local questions because those give you a jumping off point.

You simply have to draw the diagram for those. There's no major inference that you need to have seen at the beginning.

If you had only five minutes left and you still had something like 10 hard logical reasoning questions remaining, then I would probably just focus on a few of those hard ones because they require the time.

You might not be able to solve them in only 30 seconds per question. That doesn't strike me as the most reasonable course of action. So I'd be thinking about just cutting your losses and doing fewer rather than trying to attempt everything.

That's a general theme of my answer for this question:

Don't try to do an extraordinary amount of questions in a very short period of time because the harder questions have a greater deal of complexity and will actually require more of you than the easier questions that would appear earlier. 

For more, check out the LSAT Blog and LSAT Unplugged YouTube channel and podcast: Free Stuff | YouTube | Podcast | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Books | Courses



How my toughest LSAT students increased their scores (by a LOT)

I can talk all day about the importance of strategies like:

* focusing on structure of arguments and passages (not their content)

* budgeting time (i.e. speeding through easier questions so you have time for harder ones)

* diagramming (both when and when not to)


And I do.

But today, I want to show you what seven of my students did to achieve massive score increases (including the toughest cases):


Jared, a retaker who started with a random prep book:

"You get out of the LSAT what you put into it. Diligence and a high level of commitment are the keys to success on the LSAT. Steve advised me to look at ALL of the logical reasoning questions I’d gotten wrong and to analyze the ‘why’ behind each wrong/right answer choice. I did this for every wrong answer I’d gotten in the logical reasoning section, looking for patterns, and identifying areas of weakness...My scores skyrocketed up to the high 160s and into the hallowed realm of the coveted 170+ after this conversation."



Dan, a typical political science student-wannabe-lawyer:

"When I went back and looked at my previous exams I found that I was not spending enough time analyzing the rules and diagramming some important inferences...The result was a very vague understanding of the game as a whole, and left me occupied with each individual question for far too long. Once I began to properly diagram and analyze the game before moving onto the questions, I was able to knock off some of them in a matter of seconds."



Andy, a reformed slacker who had to retake:

"I revised my strategy for reviewing, circling the questions I really didn’t understand and coming back to them after a nap or a nice run. Mental breaks from problems allowed me to approach the question again from another perspective; whereas without it, I was still stuck in a particular train of thought."



Anne, a classic "splitter" - high GPA, low starting LSAT:

"I began to think like an LSAT writer, to get inside the head of the LSAT. I would start to pick up on nuances in wrong answer choices such as absolutes...or wrong answer choices that didn’t refer back to the sources cited in the argument...If you can start to have an eye for small things like this, something will click, and the LSAT will soon become a little bit simpler."



Allison, a retaker who studied while writing her senior thesis:

"The biggest piece of advice I can give to anyone prepping for the LSAT is to check your emotions. I placed a ton of pressure on myself early on, and felt extremely defeated early on in my study process, which only made things worse. Studying for the LSAT can be discouraging and anxiety-producing, but you have to keep some perspective, and trust that your work will begin to pay off."



Chrissie, a 30yo married HR manager and part-time MBA student:

"My success on test day came down to being comfortable with the time constraints...accepting my weaknesses and capitalizing on my strengths...Do not be dismayed by low numbers for weeks at a time, or low numbers in certain sections. It can all fall into place after a few months as you gain a holistic understanding of the test material."



Caroline, who struggled with stress and anxiety:

"If you are anything like me and are easily frazzled, take your PrepTests in somewhat distracting conditions (i.e. a library, coffee shop, etc.) with other people around. You may be unpleasantly surprised by a random distraction on test day and you want to be prepared so that you don’t need to retake like I did."



If you click through to read their full stories, you'll notice something:

They struggled at first, started with relatively low LSAT scores, and often got depressed about them...but then, after using my materials, they increased their scores a LOT (I'm talking 10-15 points or more).

I purposely test my materials on the toughest students because I want to be 100% sure they'll work for you and everyone else taking this test. 

Even if you've never studied before - or you tried other strategies and prep companies before - or you're retaking. (And even if, like when I first started out, you got a diagnostic score that made you feel like an idiot.)

Most people studying for this test make the same mistake I did at first:

Taking test after test and hoping something will change.

But nothing does.

Because you've got to make the investment in yourself to build the fundamentals first. Only after you build a strong foundation can you APPLY the techniques to the questions and increase your score.

So, I hope you'll take the opportunity to join the courses (or at least use the books) I've created for you if you're not using them already. They'll help you no matter where you're at in your prep.

-Steve


P.S. Not only are my materials PROVEN to work, but I offer 100% money-back guarantees, so you have the chance to try them out, then decide if they're right for you.


Recommended Resources:

1. LSAT Courses
The best of my LSAT material with exclusive access to attend my Live Online LSAT Master Classes + Q&As, and on-demand video lessons you can watch anytime. Plus, LSAT study plans to keep you on track. Save hundreds of dollars with an LSAT course package.

2. LSAT Day-By-Day Study Plans
Preparing for the LSAT is confusing. There are dozens of prep books and practice tests out there, and 1,000+ articles on my website alone. When, and how, should you use them all? These super-specific study plans give you a clear plan of attack.

3. LSAT Cheat Sheets
Based on what I'd typically do in college: read what the professor emphasized and condense it all onto a single piece of paper. It gave me a quick reference, making things a lot less threatening and a lot more manageable.