LSAT Logical Reasoning Spreadsheet

LSAT student Daniel R. has generously agreed to share his Logical Reasoning categorization. The numbers in parentheses are the page numbers in each book/PrepTest where you'll find each question.

Daniel's list only goes up to PrepTest 59, but I've added categorizations up to 
PrepTest 81 and will soon add even more. Scroll down for the big list of categorized questions.

Please note that different editions of LSAT PrepTest books may have different page numbers, and those for PT39 and up are from old individual booklets.

Please also note section numbering is different in Official LSAT Prep Plus - the below is the original section numbering in the print versions. (LSAC says they will eventually make the two consistent.)


***

First, I'll share some LSAT spreadsheets submitted by students covering older exams. 

Use this LSAT Logical Reasoning Spreadsheet submitted by A.J. (thank you!) to find more questions of the types that give you the most trouble.

You can sort questions by type by clicking on the gray rectangle under the letter at the top of each column (thanks to J.B., who also added a section at the top to help you track your progress).

Also check out this incredibly-detailed and useful LSAT progress-tracking spreadsheet submitted by Michael B. (thank you!). If you can't handle that much spreadsheet in your LSAT prep, you can use this simpler Logical Reasoning Spreadsheet submitted by H.S. (thank you!) to track your progress.

There's also a much shorter (3-page) PDF version of A.J's Logical Reasoning Spreadsheet (5-part picture version: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In this version, "SP" stands for SuperPrep. "1st#.2nd#" in the "Test" column refers to PrepTest # and Section #. For example, "17.2" in the "Test" column means PrepTest 17, Section 2.

You may want to print the 3-page version and keep with your LSAT PrepTests so you'll have it wherever you go.

(Each version of the Logical Reasoning spreadsheet has a key that explains all the symbols. The 3-page (short) version has a key at the bottom-left corner of the 3rd page. The longer version has a key at the very end. The questions marked with a "plus" are "sufficient assumption" (aka Justify) questions.)

***

LSAT Logical Reasoning Categorization List

This list is long. Numbers in parentheses are page numbers.

Click one of the following links to jump to the relevant section on that topic:

Flaw in the Reasoning
Must be True / Most Strongly Supported
Necessary Assumption
Weaken
Sufficient Assumption
Parallel Reasoning
Strengthen
Resolve the Paradox
Method of Reasoning
Principle
Except
Main Point
Point at Issue
Argument Part / Role of a Statement
Fill in the Blank
Evaluate the Argument
Cannot be True



FLAW IN THE REASONING 
PT 7, S1, #10 (18)
PT 7, S1, #17 (20)
PT 7, S4, #3 (37) (false binarism)
PT 7, S4, #9 (38) (straw man)
PT 7, S4, #11 (39)
PT 7, S4, #22 (42)
PT 8, S2, #3
PT 8, S2, #21
PT 8, S2, #24
PT 8, S4, #1
PT 8, S4, #8
PT 8, S4, #20
PT 9, S2, #2 (58) (correlation/causation)
8. PT 9, S2, #5 (59)
9. PT 9, S2, #14 (62)
10. PT 9, S2, #22 (64)
11. PT 9, S4, #1 (70)
12. PT 9, S4, #5 (71)
13. PT 9, S4, #14 (73)
14. PT 10, S1, #5 (85)
15. PT 10, S1, #8 (85)
16. PT 10, S1, #10 (86) (ambiguity)
17. PT 10, S1, #13 (87)
18. PT 10, S1, #17 (88)
19. PT 10, S1, #21 (89)
20. PT 10, S4, #14 (108)
21. PT 10, S4, #19 (110)
22. PT 10, S4, #21 (110)
23. PT 11, S2, #9 (124) (necessary/sufficient)
24. PT 11, S2, #15 (125)
25. PT 11, S2, #26 (129)
26. PT 11, S4, #3 (138)
27. PT 11, S4, #9 (140)
28. PT 11, S4, #17 (143)
29. PT 11, S4, #19 (143)
30. PT 11, S4, #23 (145)
31. PT 12, S1, #14 (155) (numbers/percentages)
32. PT 12, S1, #18 (157)
33. PT 12, S1, #20 (157) (appeal to authority)
34. PT 12, S1, #24 (159) (internal contradiction)
35. PT 12, S4, #5 (173)
36. PT 12, S4, #7 (174) (correlation/causation)
37. PT 12, S4, #15 (176)
38. PT 12, S4, #17 (177)
38. PT 12, S4, #19 (178)
39. PT 13, S2, #7 (191)
40. PT 13, S2, #20 (195)
41. PT 13, S2, #24 (197) (numbers/percentages)
42. PT 13, S2, #26 (197) (necessary/sufficient)
43. PT 13, S4, #9 (208)
44. PT 13, S4, #16 (210)
45. PT 13, S4, #20 (212)
46. PT 14, S2, #4 (225) (cumulativeness)
47. PT 14, S2, #10 (227)
48. PT 14, S2, #22 (230)
49. PT 14, S4, #9 (243)
50. PT 14, S4, #10 (243)
51. PT 14, S4, #15 (244) (source)
52. PT 14, S4, #18 (245) (numbers/percentages)
53. PT 14, S4, #20 (246)
54. PT 15, S2, #2 (262) (ad hominem)
55. PT 15, S2, #17 (267) (appeal to opinion)
56. PT 15, S2, #19 (267)
57. PT 15, S2, #20 (268) (circular reasoning)
58. PT 15, S3, #2 (270)
59. PT 15, S3, #9 (272) (correlation/causation)
60. PT 15, S3, #14 (273) (irrelevant evidence)
61. PT 15, S3, #19 (275)
62. PT 16, S2, #10 (294)
63. PT 16, S2, #22 (298)
64. PT 16, S2, #24 (299)
65. PT 16, S3, #2 (300)
66. PT 16, S3, #9 (302)
67. PT 16, S3, #11 (302) (unrepresentative sample)
68. PT 16, S3, #24 (307) (numbers/percentages)
69. PT 16, S3, #26 (307)
70. PT 18, S2, #4 (327) (irrelevant evidence)
71. PT 18, S2, #8 (328)
72. PT 18, S4, #9 (344) (correlation/causation)
73. PT 18, S4, #11 (345) (irrelevant evidence)
74. PT 18, S4, #17 (346) (irrelevant evidence)
75. PT 18, S4, #25 (349)
76. PT 19, S2, #1 (20) (ambiguity)
77. PT 19, S2, #7 (21) (numbers/percentages)
78. PT 19, S2, #14 (24) (ad hominem)
79. PT 19, S2, #23 (27) (circular reasoning)
80. PT 19, S4, #1 (36)
81. PT 19, S4, #3 (36)
82. PT 19, S4, #6 (37) (correlation/causation)
83. PT 20, S1, #10 (52)
84. PT 20, S1, #14 (53)
85. PT 20, S1, #15 (54)
86. PT 20, S1, #22 (56) (internal contradiction)
87. PT 20, S4, #2 (70)
88. PT 20, S4, #14 (73) (correlation/causation)
89. PT 20, S4, #18 (75)
90. PT 20, S4, #22 (76)
91. PT 21, S2, #5 (89)
92. PT 21, S2, #22 (95)
93. PT 21, S2, #25 (95) (appeal to authority)
94. PT 21, S3, #5 (97)
95. PT 21, S3, #19 (101) (numbers/percentages)
96. PT 22, S2, #6 (127) (assumption)
97. PT 22, S2, #7 (127)
98. PT 22, S2, #10 (128)
99. PT 22, S2, #12 (129) (ambiguity)
100. PT 22, S2, #20 (131)
101. PT 22, S2, #24 (133) (ambiguity)
102. PT 22, S2, #25 (133) (numbers/percentages) (necessary/sufficient)
103. PT 22, S4, #1 (138) (overgeneralization)
104. PT 22, S4, #9 (140)
105. PT 22, S4, #18 (142) (ambiguity)
106. PT 22, S4, #21 (144) (necessary/sufficient)
107. PT 23, S2, #4 (157) (non sequitur)
108. PT 23, S2, #19 (160) (necessary/sufficient)
119. PT 23, S2, #21 (161)
110. PT 23, S3, #7 (165) (cumulativeness)
111. PT 23, S3, #16 (168) (numbers/percentages)
112. PT 23, S3, #17 (168) (necessary/sufficient)
113. PT 23, S3, #22 (169)
114. PT 24. S2, #1 (194)
115. PT 24, S2, #6 (195)
116. PT 24, S2, #8 (196) (circular reasoning)
117. PT 24, S2, #23 (201) (necessary/sufficient)
118. PT 24, S3, #2 (202) (false analogy)
119. PT 24, S3, #4 (203)
120. PT 24, S3, #12 (205)
121. PT 24, S3, #25 (209)
122. PT 25, S2, #9 (231)
123. PT 25, S2, #18 (234) (false binarism)
124. PT 25, S2, #20 (234)
125. PT 25, S4, #4 (241) (ad hominem)
126. PT 25, S4, #8 (242) (necessary/sufficient)
127. PT 25, S4, #17 (245) (ambiguity)
128. PT 25, S4, #23 (246) (necessary/sufficient)

129. PT 26, S2, #1 (258) (appeal to pity)
130. PT 26, S2, #4 (258) (appeal to opinion)
131. PT 26, S2, #15 (262)
132. PT 26, S2, #17 (262) (LEAST)
133. PT 26, S2, #21 (264)
134. PT 26, S3, #5 (267) (numbers/percentages)
135. PT 26, S3, #8 (268)
136. PT 26, S3, #10 (268)
137. PT 26, S3, #17 (271) (necessary/sufficient)
138. PT 26, S3, #19 (271) (numbers/percentages)
139. PT 27, S1, #2 (288) (numbers/percentages)
140. PT 27, S1, #23 (294) (numbers/percentages)
141. PT 27, S4, #7 (310) (necessary/sufficient)
142. PT 27, S4, #10 (310) (necessary/sufficient)
143. PT 27, S4, #25 (315)
144. PT 28, S1, #9 (324) (appeal to opinion)
145. PT 28, S1, #19 (327)
146. PT 28, S3, #2 (334) (overgeneralization)
147. PT 28, S3, #5 (335)
148. PT 29, S1, #7 (17)
149. PT 29, S1, #14 (20)
150. PT 29, S1, #17 (20)
151. PT 29, S4, #14 (39)
152. PT 29, S4, #18 (41)
153. PT 29, S4, #25 (43)
154. PT 30, S2, #2 (54)
155. PT 30, S2, #13 (57) (numbers/percentages)
156. PT 30, S2, #17 (59) (numbers/percentages)
157. PT 30, S2, #25 (61) (correlation/causation)
158. PT 30, S2, #26 (61)
159. PT 30, S4, #6 (71) (necessary/sufficient)
160. PT 30, S4, #8 (72)
161. PT 30, S4, #14 (73) (necessary/sufficient)
162. PT 31, S2, #3 (88)
163. PT 31, S2, #9 (90)
164. PT 31, S2, #18 (93)
165. PT 31, S3, #1 (96) (overgeneralization)
166. PT 31, S3, #5 (97) (false analogy)
167. PT 31, S3, #8 (98)
168. PT 31, S3, #25 (103) (false analogy)
169. PT 32, S1, #4 (119)
170. PT 32, S1, #6 (120)
171. PT 32, S1, #10 (121)
172. PT 32, S1, #14 (122)
173. PT 32, S1, #19 (124)
174. PT 32, S4, #6 (139) (ad hominem)
175. PT 32, S4, #13 (141) (appeal to opinion)
176. PT 33, S1, #12 (155) (numbers/percentages)
177. PT 33, S1, #24 (159)
178. PT 33, S3, #5 (169)
179. PT 33, S3, #15 (172) (false analogy)
180. PT 33, S3, #17 (172)
181. PT 34, S2, #1 (194) (ad hominem)
182. PT 34, S2, #3 (194)
183. PT 34, S2, #9 (196)
184. PT 34, S2, #11 (197)
185. PT 34, S3, #4 (203) (overgeneralization)
186. PT 34, S3, #10 (204)
187. PT 35, S1, #6 (221)
188. PT 35, S1, #17 (224)
189. PT 35, S1, #23 (226)
190. PT 35, S4, #7 (242)
191. PT 35, S4, #8 (242)
192. PT 35, S4, #13 (243) (false binarism)
193. PT 35, S4, #18 (245) (overgeneralization)
194. PT 35, S4, #24 (246)
195. PT 36, S1, #10 (257) (circular reasoning)
196. PT 36, S1, #12 (257)
197. PT 36, S1, #19 (259)
198. PT 36, S3, #13 (273)
199. PT 36, S3, #21 (276) (numbers/percentages)
200. PT 36, S3, #25 (277)
201. PT 37, S2, #3 (296) (necessary/sufficient)
202. PT 37, S2, #16 (300) (necessary/sufficient)
203. PT 37, S2, #25 (303)
204. PT 37, S4, #12 (311)
205. PT 37, S4, #16 (312)
206. PT 37, S4, #17 (312) (numbers/percentages)
207. PT 37, S4, #22 (314)
208. PT 38, S1, #6 (323)
209. PT 38, S1, #8 (323) (ad hominem)
210. PT 38, S1, #11 (325) (false binarism)
211. PT 38, S1, #23 (329)
212. PT 38, S4, #2 (342)
213. PT 38, S4, #8 (344) (ad hominem)
214. PT 38, S4, #14 (345)
215. PT 38, S4, #21 (347) (necessary/sufficient)
216. PT 43, S2, #9 (21) (ad hominem)
217. PT 43, S2, #12 (22) (necessary/sufficient)
218. PT 43, S2, #20 (24)
219. PT 43, S3, #4 (28)
220. PT 43, S3, #18 (32) (ambiguity)
221. PT 43, S3, #20 (32) (internal contradiction)
222. PT 44, S2, #1 (19)
223. PT 44, S2, #21 (24) (numbers/percentages)
224. PT 44, S2, #25 (26) (necessary/sufficient)
225. PT 44, S4, #9 (33)
226. PT 44, S4, #11 (33)
227. PT 44, S4, #20 (36)
228. PT 44, S4, #22 (37)
229. PT 45, S1, #13 (14) (necessary/sufficient)
230. PT 45, S1, #15 (15)
231. PT 45, S1, #20 (16)
232. PT 45, S1, #24 (17)
233. PT 45, S4, #10 (33) (overgeneralization)
234. PT 45, S4, #14 (35)
235. PT 45, S4, #17 (35)
236. PT 45, S4, #19 (36)
237. PT 45, S4, #24 (38)
238. PT 46, S2, #11 (20)
239. PT 46, S2, #14 (21) (ad hominem)
240. PT 46, S2, #24 (25)
241. PT 46, S3, #2 (26)
242. PT 46, S3, #4 (26)
243. PT 46, S3, #7 (27)
244. PT 46, S3, #13 (29)
245. PT 46, S3, #23 (32) (necessary/sufficient)
246. PT 47, S1, #1 (9)
247. PT 47, S1, #8 (11)
248. PT 47, S1, #23 (15)
249. PT 47, S3, #8 (27)
250. PT 47, S3, #16 (29) (numbers/percentages)
251. PT 47, S3, #19 (30)
252. PT 47, S3, #23 (31)
253. PT 48, S1, #2 (10)
254. PT 48, S1, #13 (13)
255. PT 48, S1, #17 (14)
256. PT 48, S1, #21 (15)
257. PT 48, S1, #24 (16)
258. PT 48, S4, #11 (33)
259. PT 48, S4, #13 (33)
260. PT 48, S4, #15 (34)
261. PT 48, S4, #17 (34)
262. PT 48, S4, #25 (37)
263. PT 49, S2, #5 (14) (ad hominem)
264. PT 49, S2, #13 (16) (correlation/causation)
265. PT 49, S2, #18 (17)
266. PT 49, S2, #23 (19) (circular reasoning)
267. PT 49, S4, #1 (29)
268. PT 49, S4, #6 (30)
269. PT 49, S4, #12 (32)
270. PT 49, S4, #23 (35)
271. PT 50, S2, #3 (19) (overgeneralization) (numbers/percentages)
272. PT 50, S2, #6 (19)
273. PT 50, S2, #10 (20)
274. PT 50, S4, #2 (30)
275. PT 50, S4, #4 (30)
276. PT 50, S4, #7 (31)
277. PT 50, S4, #17 (34)
278. PT 50, S4, #19 (35)
279. PT 50, S4, #22 (36) (numbers/percentages)
280. PT 51, S1, #4 (10) (numbers/percentages)
281. PT 51, S1, #6 (10) (ambiguity)
282. PT 51, S1, #10 (12)
283. PT 51, S1, #12 (12)
284. PT 51, S1, #15 (13) (circular reasoning)
285. PT 51, S1, #18 (14) (numbers/percentages)
286. PT 51, S3, #4 (25) (numbers/percentages)
287. PT 51, S3, #6 (26) (overgeneralization)
288. PT 51, S3, #9 (27)
289. PT 51, S3, #17 (29)
290. JN 07, S2, #4 (7)
291. JN 07, S2, #17 (11)
292. JN 07, S2, #21 (12) (correlation/causation)
293. JN 07, S3, #4 (15)
294. JN 07, S3, #8 (16)
295. JN 07, S3, #18 (19)
296. JN 07, S3, #23 (21)
297. JN 07, S3, #25 (21) (necessary/sufficient)
298. PT 52, S1, #2 (10) (cause/effect)
299. PT 52, S1, #6 (11)
300. PT 52, S1, #23 (17) (principle)
301. PT 52, S3, #4 (23)
302. PT 52, S3, #8 (24)
303. PT 52, S3, #12 (25)
304. PT 52, S3, #16 (26) (numbers/percentages)
305. PT 52, S3, #21 (28) (cause/effect)
306. PT 53, S1, #12 (12) (ambiguity)
307. PT 53, S1, #18 (15)
308. PT 53, S1 #22 (16)
309. PT 53, S1, #25 (17)
310. PT 53, S3, #2 (22)
311. PT 53, S3, #6 (24)
312. PT 53, S3, #17 (26)
313. PT 54, S2, #1 (18) (overgeneralization)
314. PT 54, S2, #5 (19) (necessary/sufficient)
315. PT 54, S2, #15 (21)
316. PT 54, S2, #19 (23) (correlation/causation)
317. PT 54, S2, #22 (24)
318. PT 54, S4, #4 (31) (necessary/sufficient)
319. PT 54, S4, #14 (34) (necessary/sufficient)
320. PT 54, S4, #16 (34)
321. PT 54, S4, #19 (35)
322. PT 55, S1, #14 (13)
323. PT 55, S1, #20 (15)
324. PT 55, S1, #24 (17)
325. PT 55, S3, #2 (26)
326. PT 55, S3, #11 (28)
327. PT 55, S3, #18 (31)
328. PT 55, S3, #25 (33)
329. PT 56, S2, #1 (14)
330. PT 56, S2, #5 (15) (method of reasoning)
331. PT 56, S2, #12 (17)
332. PT 56, S2, #15 (18) (necessary/sufficient)
333. PT 56, S3, #1 (22) (ad hominem)
334. PT 56, S3, #4 (23)
335. PT 56, S3, #10 (24)
336. PT 56, S3, #17 (26) (correlation/causation)
337. PT 56, S3, #21 (28)
338. PT 57, S2, #4 (15) (overgeneralization)
339. PT 57, S2, #6 (16) (correlation/causation)
340. PT 57, S2, #15 (18)
341. PT 57, S2, #26 (21) (overgeneralization)
342. PT 57, S3, #2 (22) (ad hominem)
343. PT 57, S3, #8 (24)
344. PT 57, S3, #10 (24)
345. PT 57, S3, #18 (27)
346. PT 57, S3, #22 (29)
347. PT 58, S1, #9 (12)
348. PT 58, S1, #11 (13)
349. PT 58, S1, #18 (15)
350. PT 58, S4, #5 (31)
351. PT 58, S4, #8 (32) (necessary/sufficient)
352. PT 58, S4, #14 (33) (appeal to opinion)
353. PT 58, S4, #18 (34)
354. PT 59, S2, #4 (6) (correlation/causation)
355. PT 59, S2, #6 (6)
356. PT 59, S2, #8 (7)
357. PT 59, S2, #15 (9) (ambiguity)
358. PT 59, S2, #20 (10) (numbers/percentages)
359. PT 59, S3, #5 (14)
360. PT 59, S3, #8 (15) (overgeneralization)
361. PT 59, S3, #20 (18)
362. PT 59, S3, #22 (19) (necessary/sufficient)
363. PT 59, S3, #24 (20)
PT 60, S1, #1
PT 60, S1, #10
PT 60, S1, #12
PT 60, S1, #15
PT 60, S3, #8
PT 60, S3, #16
PT 60, S3, #19
PT 61, S2, #1
PT 61, S2, #8
PT 61, S2, #18
PT 61, S4, #11
PT 61, S4, #15
PT 61, S4, #24
PT 62, S2, #5
PT 62, S2, #8
PT 62, S2, #11
PT 62, S4, #10
PT 62, S4, #13
PT 62, S4, #19
PT 63, S1, #3
PT 63, S1, #23
PT 63, S1, #25
PT 63, S3, #2
PT 63, S3, #14
PT 63, S3, #18
PT 64, S1, #5
PT 64, S1, #7
PT 64, S1, #16
PT 64, S1, #19
PT 64, S3, #4
PT 64, S3, #6
PT 64, S3, #11
PT 64, S3, #14
PT 65, S1, #8
PT 65, S1, #15
PT 65, S1, #17
PT 65, S1, #20
PT 65, S4, #8
PT 65, S4, #11
PT 65, S4, #26
PT 66, S2, #1
PT 66, S2, #8
PT 66, S2, #11
PT 66, S2, #13
PT 66, S2, #15
PT 66, S2, #21
PT 66, S4, #1
PT 66, S4, #22
PT 66, S4, #25
PT 67, S2, #9
PT 67, S2, #13
PT 67, S2, #21
PT 67, S4, #9
PT 67, S4, #14
PT 67, S4, #21
PT 68, S2, #7
PT 68, S2, #12
PT 68, S2, #20
PT 68, S2, #24
PT 68, S3, #3
PT 68, S3, #5
PT 68, S3, #16
PT 68, S3, #21
PT 69, S1, #3
PT 69, S1, #20
PT 69, S1, #24
PT 69, S4, #3
PT 69, S4, #11
PT 69, S4, #15
PT 69, S4, #16
PT 69, S4, #18
PT 69, S4, #22
PT 70, S1, #2
PT 70, S1, #9
PT 70, S1, #15
PT 70, S1, #20
PT 70, S4, #3
PT 70, S4, #9
PT 70, S4, #11
PT 71, S1, #3
PT 71, S1, #18
PT 71, S1, #21
PT 71, S1, #24
PT 71, S3, #1
PT 71, S3, #7
PT 71, S3, #18
PT 71, S3, #20
PT 72, S2, #5
PT 72, S2, #14
PT 72, S2, #16
PT 72, S2, #18
PT 72, S2, #20
PT 72, S3, #7
PT 72, S3, #11
PT 72, S3, #14
PT 72, S3, #22
PT 73, S2, #3
PT 73, S2, #5
PT 73, S2, #13
PT 73, S2, #15
PT 73, S2, #18
PT 73, S4, #3
PT 73, S4, #10
PT 73, S4, #25
PT 74, S1, #5
PT 74, S1, #16
PT 74, S1, #18
PT 74, S4, #8
PT 74, S4, #15
PT 74, S4, #18
PT 74, S4, #20
PT 74, S4, #22
PT 75, S1, #7
PT 75, S1, #12
PT 75, S1, #18
PT 75, S1, #24
PT 75, S3, #7
PT 75, S3, #10
PT 75, S3, #16
PT 75, S3, #18
PT 76, S2, #1
PT 76, S2, #4
PT 76, S2, #16
PT 76, S2, #19
PT 76, S4, #5
PT 76, S4, #13
PT 76, S4, #15
PT 77, S2, #14
PT 77, S2, #18
PT 77, S2, #22
PT 77, S4, #6
PT 77, S4, #9
PT 77, S4, #12
PT 78, S1, #7
PT 78, S1, #9
PT 78, S1, #22
PT 78, S3, #1
PT 78, S3, #5
PT 78, S3, #15
PT 79, S1, #2
PT 79, S1, #6
PT 79, S1, #13
PT 79, S1, #15
PT 79, S4, #9
PT 79, S4, #18
PT 80, S1, #2
PT 80, S1, #13
PT 80, S1, #16
PT 80, S4, #1
PT 80, S4, #11
PT 80, S4, #16
PT 80, S4, #26
PT 81, S2, #8
PT 81, S2, #20
PT 81, S2, #25
PT 81, S3, #7
PT 81, S3, #9
PT 81, S3, #13
PT 81, S3, #15
PT 81, S3, #23


MUST BE TRUE/MOST STRONGLY SUPPORTED 

1. PT 7, S1, #8 (18) (MSS)
2. PT 7, S1, #9 (18) (MSS)
3. PT 7, S1, #12 (19) (MBT) (formal logic)
4. PT 7, S1, #16 (20) (MSS)
5. PT 7, S1, #21 (22) (MSS)
6. PT 7, S4, #7 (38) (MBT)
7. PT 7, S4, #10 (38) (MSS)
8. PT 7, S4, #15 (40) (MBT)
9. PT 7, S4, #19 (41) (MSS)
10. PT 9, S2, #10 (60) (MSS)
11. PT 9, S2, #13 (61) (MBT)
12. PT 9, S4, #4 (70) (MBT)
13. PT 9, S4, #7 (71) (MSS)
14. PT 9, S4, #13 (73) (MBT)
15. PT 9, S4, #16 (74) (MBT)
16. PT 9, S4, #23 (76) (MBT)
17. PT 10, S1, #18 (88) (MBT) (logically committed to which of the following…)
18. PT 10, S1, #22 (90) (MSS)
19. PT 10, S1, #24 (91) (MSS)
20. PT 10, S1, #3 (104) (MSS)
21. PT 10, S4, #10 (106) (MSS)
22. PT 10, S4, #16 (109) (MSS)
23. PT 10, S4, #20 (110) (MSS)
24. PT 10, S4, #22 (110) (MBT)
25. PT 11, S2, #7 (123) (MBT)
26. PT 11, S2, #12 (125) (MBT) (formal logic)
27. PT 11, S2, #16 (126) (MBT)
28. PT 11, S4, #4 (138) (MSS)
29. PT 11, S4, #14 (142) (MSS)
30. PT 11, S4, #16 (142) (MBT)
31. PT 12, S1, #8 (154) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
32. PT 12, S1, #21 (157) (MBT)
33. PT 12, S4, #1 (172) (MSS)
34. PT 12, S4, #3 (173) (MSS)
35. PT 12, S4, #16 (177) (MSS)
36. PT 13, S2, #4 (191) (MSS)
37. PT 13, S2, #6 (191) (MSS)
38. PT 13, S2, #10 (192) (MBT)
39. PT 13, S2, #18 (195) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
40. PT 13, S4, #5 (207) (MBT)
41. PT 13, S4, #18 (211) (MBT)
42. PT 14, S2, #11 (227) (MBT)
43. PT 14, S2, #16 (228)(MBT) (numbers/percentages)
44. PT 14, S2, #23 (230) (MSS)
45. PT 14, S4, #5 (241) (MSS)
46. PT 14, S4, #17 (245) (MBT)
47. PT 14, S4, #21 (246) (MSS)
48. PT 15, S2, #9 (264) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
49. PT 15, S2, #12 (265) (MBT)
50. PT 15, S2, #15 (266) (MSS)
51. PT 15, S3, #5 (271) (MBT)
52. PT 15, S3, #7 (271) (MBT) (logically committed to which of the following…)
53. PT 16, S2, #3 (293) (MBT)
54. PT 16, S2, #9 (294) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
55. PT 16, S2, #11 (295) (MSS)
56. PT 16, S2, #20 (298) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
57. PT 16, S3, #5 (301) (MSS)
58. PT 16, S3, #8 (302) (MBT)
59. PT 16, S3, #16 (304) (MBT)
60. PT 16, S3, #21 (305) (MBT)
61. PT 18, S2, #3 (326) (MBT)
62. PT 18, S2, #20 (332) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
63. PT 18, S4, #6 (343) (MBT)
64. PT 18, S4, #10 (344) (MBT)
65. PT 18, S4, #24 (349) (MSS)
66. PT 19, S2, #3 (20) (MSS)
67. PT 19, S2, #24 (27) (MSS)
68. PT 19, S4, #12 (39) (MSS)
69. PT 19, S4, #19 (41) (MSS)
70. PT 20, S1, #1 (50) (MSS)
71. PT 20, S1, #6 (51) (MSS)
72. PT 20, S1, #23 (57) (MSS)
73. PT 20, S1, #24 (57) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
74. PT 20, S4, #6 (71) (MBT)
75. PT 20, S4, #10 (72) (MSS)
76. PT 20, S4, #19 (75) (MBT)
77. PT 21, S2, #8 (90) (MBT)
78. PT 21, S2, #10 (90) (MBT)
79. PT 21, S2, #13 (91) (MSS)
80. PT 21, S2, #18 (93) (MBT) (formal logic)
81. PT 21, S3, #1 (96) (MBT)
82. PT 21, S3, #12 (99) (MSS)
83. PT 21, S3, #16 (100) (MSS)
84. PT 21, S3, #18 (101) (MSS)
85. PT 21, S3, #24 (103) (MBT)
86. PT 22, S2, #5 (127) (MSS)
87. PT 22, S2, #15 (130) (MSS)
88. PT 22, S2, #17 (130) (MSS)
89. PT 22, S2, #18 (130) (MSS) (principle) (necessary/sufficient)
90. PT 22, S2, #22 (132) (MSS)
91. PT 22, S4, #4 (139) (MBT) (logically committed to which of the following…)
92. PT 22, S4, #12 (141) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
93. PT 22, S4, #14 (141) (MSS)
94. PT 22, S4, #25 (145) (MBT)
95. PT 23, S2, #7 (157) (MSS)
96. PT 23, S2, #10 (158) (MBT) (formal logic)
97. PT 23, S2, #12 (159) (MBT) (formal logic)
98. PT 23, S2, #20 (161) (MBT)
99. PT 23, S2, #24 (162) (MSS)
100. PT 23, S3, #4 (165) (MSS)
101. PT 23, S3, #6 (165) (MSS)
102. PT 23, S3, #12 (167) (MSS)
103. PT 23, S3, #20 (169) (MSS)
104. PT 24, S2, #2 (194) (MSS)
105. PT 24, S2, #11 (196) (MBT) (formal logic)
106. PT 24, S3, #7 (204) (MSS)
107. PT 24, S3, #8 (204) (MBT)
108. PT 24, S3, #11 (204) (MBT)
109. PT 24, S3, #15 (205) (MBT)
110. PT 24, S2, #13 (232) (MSS)
111. PT 25, S2, #19 (234) (LEAST strongly supported)
112. PT 25, S2, #21 (234) (MBT)
113. PT 25, S4, #2 (240) (MBT)
114. PT 26, S2, #6 (259) (MBT)
115. PT 26, S2, #9 (260) (MSS)
116. PT 26, S3, #15 (270) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
117. PT 26, S3, #20 (272) (LEAST strongly supported)
118. PT 26, S3, #22 (272) (MBT)
119. PT 27, S1, #3 (289) (MSS)
120. PT 27, S1, #9 (291) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
121. PT 27, S1, #12 (292) (MSS)
122. PT 27, S1, #19 (293) (MBT)
123. PT 27, S1, #20 (294) (MSS)
124. PT 27, S1, #22 (294) (MBT)
125. PT 27, S4, #5 (309) (MBT)
126. PT 27, S4, #14 (312) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
127. PT 27, S4, #17 (313) (MBT)
128. PT 27, S4, #23 (314) (MSS)
129. PT 28, S1, #14 (325) (MBT)
130. PT 28, S1, #16 (326) (MSS)
131. PT 28, S1, #22 (328) (MSS)
132. PT 28, S3, #1 (334) (MBT)
133. PT 28, S3, #8 (335) (MBT)
134. PT 29, S1, #6 (17) (MBT)
135. PT 29, S1, #8 (18) (MSS)
136. PT 29, S1, #18 (21) (MBT) (formal logic)
137. PT 29, S1, #21 (22) (MBT)
138. PT 29, S4, #3 (36) (MSS)
139. PT 29, S4, #12 (39) (MSS)
140. PT 29, S4, #23 (42) (MBT)
141. PT 30, S2, #16 (58) (MSS)
142. PT 30, S2, #18 (59) (MBT)
143. PT 30, S2, #20 (59) (MBT)
144. PT 30, S4, #4 (71) (MBT)
145. PT 30, S4, #10 (72) (MSS)
146. PT 30, S4, #22 (76) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
147. PT 31, S2, #7 (90) (MSS)
148. PT 31, S2, #17 (93) (MBT)
149. PT 31, S2, #20 (94) (MSS)
150. PT 31, S3, #6 (97) (MSS)
151. PT 31, S3, #10 (98) (MBT)
152. PT 31, S3, #22 (101) (MSS)
153. PT 32, S1, #7 (120)
154. PT 32, S1, #9 (120) (MSS)
155. PT 32, S1, #11 (121) (MBT)
156. PT 32, S1, #18 (124) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
157. PT 32, S1, #24 (125) (MSS)
158. PT 32, S4, #10 (140) (MSS)
159. PT 32, S4, #14 (142) (MSS)
160. PT 32, S4, #24 (145) (MBT)
161. PT 33, S1, #7 (154) (MSS)
162. PT 33, S1, #9 (154) (MSS)
163. PT 33, S1, #11 (155) (MBT)
164. PT 33, S3, #8 (170) (MBT) (formal logic)
165. PT 33, S3, #10 (170) (MSS)
166. PT 33, S3, #13 (171) (MSS)
167. PT 34, S2, #4 (195) (MSS)
168. PT 34, S2, #19 (199) (MSS)
169. PT 34, S2, #23 (200) (MBT)
170. PT 34, S3, #13 (205) (MBT)
171. PT 34, S3, #19 (207) (MSS)
172. PT 35, S1, #12 (223) (MSS)
173. PT 35, S1, #19 (225) (MSS)
174. PT 35, S4, #3 (240) (MSS)
175. PT 35, S4, #21 (246) (MSS)
176. PT 35, S4, #22 (246) (LEAST strongly supported)
177. PT 35, S4, #26 (247) (MSS)
178. PT 36, S1, #4 (255) (MSS)
179. PT 36, S1, #11 (257) (MBT)
180. PT 36, S1, #14 (258) (MBT)
181. PT 36, S1, #16 (258) (MSS)
182. PT 36, S1, #17 (275) (MSS)
183. PT 37, S2, #2 (296) (MBT)
184. PT 37, S2, #7 (297) (MBT)
185. PT 37, S2, #12 (299) (MBT)
186. PT 37, S4, #3 (308) (MSS)
187. PT 37, S4, #6 (309) (MSS)
188. PT 38, S1, #13 (325) (MSS)
189. PT 38, S1, #15 (326) (MSS)
190. PT 38, S1, #20 (327) (MSS)
191. PT 38, S1, #21 (328) (MSS)
192. PT 38, S4, #1 (342) (MBT)
193. PT 38, S4, #24 (348) (MBT)
194. PT 43, S2, #4 (20) (MSS)
195. PT 43, S2, #7 (21) (MBT)
196. PT 43, S2, #17 (24) (MBT) (formal logic)
197. PT 43, S2, #22 (25) (MBT)
198. PT 43, S3, #9 (29) (MBT) (formal logic)
199. PT 43, S3, #21 (33) (MBT) (formal logic)
200. PT 43, S3, #24 (33) (MBT) (formal logic)
201. PT 44, S2, #2 (19) (MSS)
202. PT 44, S2, #11 (21) (MSS)
203. PT 44, S2, #14 (22) (MSS)
204. PT 44, S4, #3 (31) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
205. PT 44, S4, #12 (33) (MSS)
206. PT 44, S4, #15 (34) (MBT)
207. PT 45, S1, #8 (13) (MBT)
208. PT 45, S1, #22 (17) (MBT)
209. PT 45, S4, #16 (35) (MSS)
210. PT 45, S4, #18 (36) (MSS)
211. PT 46, S2, #2 (18) (MBT)
212. PT 46, S2, #7 (19) (MBT)
213. PT 46, S2, #12 (21) (MSS)
214. PT 46, S3, #9 (28) (MSS)
215. PT 46, S3, #11 (28) (MBT) (numbers/percentages)
216. PT 46, S3, #25 (33) (MBT)
217. PT 47, S1, #16 (13) (MSS)
218. PT 47, S1, #18 (14) (MBT)
219. PT 47, S3, #1 (25) (MSS)
220. PT 47, S3, #3 (25) (MSS)
221. PT 47, S3, #10 (27) (MSS)
222. PT 48, S1, #14 (13) (MBT)
223. PT 48, S1, #26 (17) (MBT)
224. PT 48, S4, #3 (31) (MSS)
225. PT 48, S4, #14 (33) (MBT)
226. PT 48, S4, #16 (34) (MSS) (principle)
227. PT 49, S2, #9 (15) (MSS)
228. PT 49, S2, #20 (18) (MSS)
229. PT 49, S4, #3 (29) (MBT)
230. PT 49, S4, #10 (31) (MBT)
231. PT 49, S4, #14 (32) (MSS)
232. PT 49, S4, #19 (34) (MBT)
233. PT 50, S2, #1 (18) (MSS)
234. PT 50, S2, #9 (20) (MBT)
235. PT 50, S2, #18 (23) (MSS)
236. PT 50, S4, #1 (30) (MSS)
237. PT 50, S4, #10 (32) (MBT)
238. PT 50, S4, #15 (34) (MBT)
239. PT 51, S1, #11 (12) (MBT)
240. PT 51, S1, #21 (15) (MSS)
241. PT 51, S3, #12 (27) (MSS)
242. PT 51, S3, #14 (28) (MBT)
243. PT 51, S3, #19 (30) (MBT)
244. PT 51, S3, #21 (30) (MSS)
245. JN 07, S2, #18 (11) (MSS)
246. JN 07, S2, #22 (12) (MSS)
247. JN 07, S3, #22 (21) (MBT)
248. PT 52, S1, #5 (11) (MBT)
249. PT 52, S1, #7 (12) (MSS)
250. PT 52, S1, #15 (14) (MSS)
251. PT 52, S1, #24 (17) (MSS)
252. PT 52, S1, #14 (25) (MSS)
253. PT 52, S3, #18 (27) (MSS)
254. PT 52, S3, #23 (28) (MSS)
255. PT 53, S1, #7 (11) (MBT)
256. PT 53, S1, #16 (14) (MBT)
257. PT 53, S3, #19 (27) (MBT)
258. PT 53, S3, #21 (27) (MSS)
259. PT 54, S2, #12 (20) (MSS)
260. PT 54, S2, #16 (21) (MBT) (formal logic)
261. PT 54, S2, #20 (23) (MSS)
262. PT 54, S2, #25 (25) (MBT)
263. PT 54, S4, #5 (31) (MSS)
264. PT 54, S4, #12 (33) (MSS)
265. PT 54, S4, #23 (36) (MBT)
266. PT 55, S1, #5 (11) (MSS)
267. PT 55, S1, #8 (12) (MSS)
268. PT 55, S1, #10 (12) (MSS)
269. PT 55, S1, #15 (14) (MBT)
270. PT 55, S3, #5 (27) (MSS)
271. PT 55, S3, #12 (29) (MSS) (numbers/percentages)
272. PT 55, S3, #16 (30) (MSS)
273. PT 56, S2, #19 (19) (MBT) (formal logic)
274. PT 56, S2, #23 (20) (MBT) (necessary/sufficient)
275. PT 56, S3, #2 (22) (MSS)
276. PT 56, S3, #11 (24) (MSS)
277. PT 56, S3, #15 (26) (MSS)
278. PT 57, S2, #25 (21) (MBT)
279. PT 57, S3, #13 (25) (MSS)
280. PT 57, S3, #23 (29) (MSS)
281. PT 57, S3, #25 (29) (MSS)
282. PT 58, S1, #10 (12) (MSS)
283. PT 58, S1, #15 (14) (MBT)
284. PT 58, S1, #20 (15) (MBT)
285. PT 58, S4, #6 (31) (MSS)
286. PT 58, S4, #9 (32) (MBT)
287. PT 58, S4, #13 (33) (MSS)
288. PT 58, S4, #15 (33) (MSS)
289. PT 58, S2, #19 (10) (MBT) (formal logic)
290. PT 59, S3, #3 (14) (MSS)
291. PT 59, S3, #7 (15) (MSS)
292. PT 59, S3, #19 (18) (MBT)
293. PT 59, S3, #21 (19) (MSS)

(Starting with PT60, I've separated Must Be True and Most Strongly Supported into separate categories.)

Must Be True
PT 60, S1, #3
PT 60, S3, #12
PT 60, S3, #17
PT 61, S2, #3
PT 61, S2, #10
PT 62, S2, #6
PT 62, S2, #19
PT 62, S4, #6
PT 63, S1, #6
PT 63, S1, #9
PT 63, S1, #20
PT 63, S3, #5
PT 64, S1, #2
PT 64, S1, #18
PT 64, S1, #20
PT 65, S1, #25
PT 65, S4, #6
PT 66, S2, #14
PT 66, S4, #21
PT 67, S4, #17
PT 68, S2, #1
PT 68, S2, #18
PT 68, S3, #4
PT 69, S1, #21
PT 69, S4, #20
PT 70, S1, #8
PT 70, S1, #22
PT 70, S1, #24
PT 70, S4, #14
PT 70, S4, #21
PT 71, S1, #17
PT 71, S3, #10

Most Strongly Supported

PT 60, S1, #24
PT 60, S3, #10
PT 61, S4, #3
PT 61, S4, #5
PT 61, S4, #7
PT 61, S4, #10
PT 62, S2, #21
PT 62, S4, #8
PT 62, S4, #11
PT 63, S1, #12
PT 63, S3, #3
PT 63, S3, #7
PT 63, S3, #13
PT 64, S3, #22
PT 65, S4, #9
PT 66, S2, #22
PT 67, S2, #7
PT 67, S2, #11
PT 67, S4, #5
PT 67, S4, #15
PT 68, S2, #8
PT 68, S2, #10
PT 68, S3, #2
PT 68, S3, #10
PT 68, S3, #13
PT 69, S1, #10
PT 69, S1, #12
PT 69, S4, #2
PT 69, S4, #9
PT 70, S4, #2
PT 70, S4, #18
PT 71, S1, #8
PT 71, S1, #15
PT 71, S3, #17
PT 71, S3, #23



NECESSARY ASSUMPTION

1. PT 7, S1, #2 (16)
2. PT 7, S1, #14 (19)
3. PT 7, S1, #24 (23)
4. PT 7, S4, #6 (37)
5. PT 7, S4, #13 (39)
6. PT 7, S4, #23 (43)
7. PT 7, S4, #24 (43)
8. PT 9, S2, #19 (63)
9. PT 9, S2, #21 (64)
10. PT 9, S2, #25 (65)
11. PT 9, S4, #6 (71)
12. PT 9, S4, #10 (72)
13. PT 9, S4, #19 (74)
14. PT 9, S4, #25 (77)`
15. PT 10, S1, #1 (84)
16. PT 10, S1, #7 (85)
17. PT 10, S1, #15 (87)
18. PT 10, S4, #4 (104) (numbers/percentages)
19. PT 10, S4, #8 (106)
20. PT 10, S4, #18 (109)
21. PT 11, S2, #5 (123)
22. PT 11, S2, #13 (125)
23. PT 11, S2, #18 (127)
24. PT 11, S2, #24 (128)
25. PT 11, S4, #7 (140)
26. PT 11, S4, #13 (141)
27. PT 11, S4, #15 (142)
28. PT 12, S1, #2 (152)
29. PT 12, S1, #10 (154)
30. PT 12, S1, #13 (155)
31. PT 12, S4, #2 (172)
32. PT 12, S4, #6 (173)
33. PT 12, S4, #8 (174)
34. PT 13, S2, #12 (193)
35. PT 13, S2, #14 (193)
36. PT 13, S4, #4 (206)
37. PT 13, S4, #8 (208)
38. PT 13, S4, #11 (209)
39. PT 14, S2, #18 (229)
40. PT 14, S2, #20 (230)
41. PT 14, S4, #13 (244)
42. PT 14, S4, #19 (245)
43. PT 15, S2, #6 (263)
44. PT 15, S2, #16 (266)
45. PT 15, S2, #23 (269)
46. PT 15, S3, #3 (270)
47. PT 15, S3, #12 (273)
48. PT 15, S3, #24 (277)
49. PT 16, S2, #6 (293)
50. PT 16, S2, #14 (296) (numbers/percentages)
51. PT 16, S3, #3 (301)
52. PT 16, S3, #12 (303)
53. PT 16, S3, #14 (303)
54. PT 18, S2 #9 (328)
55. PT 18, S2, #15 (330)
56. PT 18, S4, #8 (344)
57. PT 18, S4, #18 (347)
58. PT 18, S4, #22 (348)
59. PT 19, S2, #2 (20)
60. PT 19, S2, #9 (22)
61. PT 19, S2, #13 (23) (numbers/percentages)
62. PT 19, S2, #15 (24)
63. PT 19, S4, #4 (36)
64. PT 19, S4, #8 (38)
65. PT 19, S4, #14 (39)
66. PT 20, S1, #3 (50) (numbers/percentages)
67. PT 20, S1, #11 (52) (numbers/percentages)
68. PT 20, S1, #16 (54)
69. PT 20, S4, #1 (70)
70. PT 20, S4, #8 (71)
71. PT 20, S4, #11 (72)
72. PT 20, S4, #16 (74)
73. PT 21, S2, #3 (89)
74. PT 21, S2, #6 (89)
75. PT 21, S2, #11 (91)
76. PT 21, S2, #19 (93)
77. PT 21, S3, #4 (97)
78. PT 21, S3, #6 (97)
79. PT 21, S3, #8 (98)
80. PT 21, S3, #13 (99)
81. PT 22, S2, #1 (126)
82. PT 22, S2 #14 (129)
83. PT 22, S4, #5 (139)
84. PT 22, S4, #11 (141)
85. PT 22, S4, #16 (142)
86. PT 22, S4, #22 (144)
87. PT 23, S2, #6 (157)
88. PT 23, S2, #9 (158)
89. PT 23, S2, #17 (160)
90. PT 23, S3, #3 (164)
91. PT 23, S3, #9 (166)
92. PT 23, S3, #11 (167)
93. PT 24, S2, #17 (199)
94. PT 24, S3, #5 (203)
95. PT 24, S3, #13 (205)
96. PT 24, S3, #18 (206)
97. PT 25, S2, #6 (230)
98. PT 25, S2, #12 (232)
99. PT 25, S2, #16 (233)
100. PT 25, S2, #24 (235) (principle)
101. PT 25, S4, #9 (242)
102. PT 25, S4, #25 (247)
103. PT 26, S2, #7 (259)
104. PT 26, S2, #10 (260)
105. PT 26, S2, #13 (261)
106. PT 26, S2, #25 (265)
107. PT 26, S3, #9 (268)
108. PT 26, S3, #11 (268)
109. PT 27, S1, #13 (292)
110. PT 27, S1, #21 (294)
111. PT 27, S4, #4 (309)
112. PT 27, S4, #9 (310)
113. PT 27, S4, #19 (313)
114. PT 27, S4, #20 (313)
115. PT 28, S1, #2 (322)
116. PT 28, S1, #12 (325)
117. PT 28, S1, #21 (327)
118. PT 28, S3, #16 (337)
119. PT 28, S3, #19 (338)
120. PT 28, S3, #22 (339)
121. PT 29, S1, #5 (17)
122. PT 29, S1, #15 (20)
123. PT 29, S4, #4 (37)
124. PT 29, S4, #5 (37)
125. PT 29, S4, #8 (38)
126. PT 30, S2, #11 (57)
127. PT 30, S2, #15 (58)
128. PT 30, S2, #22 (60)
129. PT 30, S4, #19 (75) (questionable assumption)
130. PT 31, S2, #2 (88)
131. PT 31, S2, #14 (92)
132. PT 31, S3, #11 (98)
133. PT 31, S3, #13 (99)
134. PT 31, S3, #17 (100)
135. PT 31, S3, #21 (101)
136. PT 32, S1, #1 (118)
137. PT 32, S1, #21 (124)
138. PT 32, S1, #23 (125)
139. PT 32, S1, #25 (125)
140. PT 32, S4, #7 (140)
141. PT 32, S4, #16 (142)
142. PT 32, S4, #19 (143)
143. PT 33, S1, #10 (154)
144. PT 33, S1, #13 (155)
145. PT 33, S1, #19 (157)
146. PT 33, S3, #11 (171)
147. PT 33, S3, #16 (172)
148. PT 33, S3, #25 (175)
149. PT 34, S2, #13 (197)
150. PT 34, S2, #16 (198)
151. PT 34, S2, #21 (199)
152. PT 34, S3, #3 (202)
153. PT 34, S3, #5 (203)
154. PT 34, S3, #9 (204)
155. PT 34, S3, #11 (205)
156. PT 34, S3, #17 (206)
157. PT 35, S1, #14 (224)
158. PT 35, S1, #18 (225)
159. PT 35, S4, #16 (244)
160. PT 36, S1, #3 (255)
161. PT 36, S1, #20 (259)
162. PT 36, S3, #14 (274)
163. PT 36, S3, #16 (275)
164. PT 36, S3, #18 (275)
165. PT 36, S3, #22 (276)
166. PT 37, S2, #15 (300)
167. PT 37, S2, #19 (301)
168. PT 37, S4, #15 (312)
169. PT 37, S4, #19 (313)
170. PT 37, S4, #23 (315)
171. PT 38, S1, #12 (325)
172. PT 38, S1, #14 (325)
173. PT 38, S1, #24 (329)
174. PT 38, S4, #6 (343)
175. PT 38, S4, #20 (347)
176. PT 38, S4, #22 (347)
177. PT 43, S2, #10 (21)
178. PT 43, S2, #16 (23)
179. PT 43, S3, #1 (27)
180. PT 43, S3, #12 (30)
181. PT 44, S2, #5 (20)
182. PT 44, S2, #9 (21)
183. PT 44, S2, #18 (23)
184. PT 44, S2, #23 (25)
185. PT 44, S4, #7 (32)
186. PT 44, S4, #16 (34)
187. PT 45, S1, #3 (11)
188. PT 45, S4, #6 (32)
189. PT 45, S4, #13 (34)
190. PT 46, S2, #10 (20)
191. PT 46, S2, #13 (21)
192. PT 46, S3, #15 (29)
193. PT 46, S3, #17 (30)
194. PT 46, S3, #20 (31)
195. PT 46, S3, #26 (33)
196. PT 47, S1, #17 (13)
197. PT 47, S1, #20 (14)
198. PT 47, S3, #13 (28)
199. PT 47, S3, #17 (29)
200. PT 48, S1, #15 (13)
201. PT 48, S1, #20 (15)
202. PT 48, S4, #10 (32)
203. PT 49, S2, #17 (17)
204. PT 49, S2, #22 (18)
205. PT 49, S4, #13 (32)
206. PT 49, S4, #16 (33)
207. PT 49, S4, #20 (34)
208. PT 50, S2, #14 (22)
209. PT 50, S2, #16 (22)
210. PT 50, S4, #11 (32)
211. PT 50, S4, #21 (35)
212. PT 51, S1, #7 (10)
213. PT 51, S3, #2 (25)
214. PT 51, S3, #15 (29)
215. PT 51, S3, #18 (29)
216. JN 07, S3, #9 (16)
217. JN 07, S3, #11 (16)
218. JN 07, S3, #17 (19)
219. PT 52, S1, #10 (13)
220. PT 52, S1, #25 (17)
221. PT 52, S3, #7 (24)
222. PT 52, S3, #9 (24)
223. PT 52, S3, #13 (25)
224. PT 53, S1, #9 (12)
225. PT 53, S1, #13 (13)
226. PT 53, S1, #15 (14)
227. PT 53, S1, #23 (17)
228. PT 53, S3, #8 (24)
229. PT 53, S3, #15 (26)
230. PT 53, S3, #20 (27)
231. PT 54, S2, #2 (18)
232. PT 54, S2, #6 (19)
233. PT 54, S2, #9 (20) (numbers/percentages)
234. PT 54, S4, #3 (31)
235. PT 54, S4, #7 (32)
236. PT 54, S4, #18 (35)
237. PT 54, S4, #24 (37) (numbers/percentages)
238. PT 55, S1, #2 (10)
239. PT 55, S1, #12 (13)
240. PT 55, S1, #17 (14)
241. PT 55, S3, #8 (28)
242. PT 55, S3, #19 (31)
243. PT 55, S3, #24 (33)
244. PT 56, S2, #4 (15)
245. PT 56, S2, #6 (15)
246. PT 56, S2, #20 (19) (principle)
247. PT 56, S3, #9 (24)
248. PT 56, S3, #18 (26)
249. PT 56, S3, #25 (29)
250. PT 57, S2, #24 (21)
251. PT 57, S3, #12 (25)
252. PT 57, S3, #17 (27)
253. PT 58, S1, #1 (10)
254. PT 58, S1, #14 (13)
255. PT 58, S1, #16 (14)
256. PT 58, S1, #19 (15)
257. PT 58, S1, #22 (16)
258. PT 58, S4, #11 (32)
259. PT 58, S4, #17 (34)
260. PT 58, S4, #21 (35)
261. PT 59, S2, #14 (8)
262. PT 59, S3, #12 (16)
263. PT 59, S3, #16 (17)
264. PT 59, S3, #25 (20)
PT 60, S1, #7
PT 60, S1, #14
PT 60, S1, #20
PT 60, S3, #11
PT 60, S3, #22
PT 61, S2, #16
PT 61, S4, #20
PT 62, S2, #12
PT 62, S2, #25
PT 62, S4, #23
PT 63, S1, #5
PT 63, S1, #19
PT 63, S3, #6
PT 63, S3, #11
PT 63, S3, #15
PT 64, S1, #15
PT 64, S3, #12
PT 64, S3, #19
PT 65, S1, #18
PT 65, S1, #21
PT 65, S4, #2
PT 65, S4, #13
PT 65, S4, #20
PT 65, S4, #23
PT 66, S2, #2
PT 66, S2, #4
PT 66, S2, #10
PT 66, S4, #3
PT 66, S4, #7
PT 67, S2, #6
PT 67, S2, #14
PT 67, S4, #2
PT 67, S4, #11
PT 67, S4, #16
PT 67, S4, #18
PT 68, S2, #15
PT 68, S3, #18
PT 68, S3, #23
PT 69, S1, #4
PT 69, S1, #7
PT 69, S1, #19
PT 69, S4, #8
PT 70, S1, #13
PT 70, S1, #21
PT 70, S4, #6
PT 70, S4, #10
PT 70, S4, #20
PT 70, S4, #25
PT 71, S1, #16
PT 71, S1, #22
PT 71, S3, #19
PT 72, S2, #12
PT 72, S2, #15
PT 72, S2, #21
PT 72, S3, #4
PT 72, S3, #18
PT 73, S2, #1
PT 73, S2, #8
PT 73, S2, #20
PT 73, S4, #13
PT 73, S4, #19
PT 73, S4, #26
PT 74, S1, #8
PT 74, S4, #4
PT 74, S4, #6
PT 75, S1, #1
PT 75, S1, #3
PT 75, S3, #2
PT 75, S3, #17
PT 75, S3, #19
PT 75, S3, #23
PT 75, S3, #25
PT 76, S2, #5
PT 76, S2, #18
PT 76, S2, #24
PT 76, S4, #12
PT 76, S4, #16
PT 76, S4, #18
PT 76, S4, #20
PT 76, S4, #24
PT 77, S2, #3
PT 77, S2, #6
PT 77, S2, #24
PT 77, S4, #26
PT 78, S1, #2
PT 78, S1, #14
PT 78, S1, #19
PT 78, S1, #24
PT 78, S3, #12
PT 79, S1, #4
PT 79, S1, #7
PT 79, S1, #18
PT 79, S1, #24
PT 79, S4, #2
PT 79, S4, #6
PT 79, S4, #8
PT 79, S4, #21
PT 80, S1, #5
PT 80, S1, #17
PT 80, S1, #25
PT 80, S4, #18
PT 81, S2, #5
PT 81, S2, #11
PT 81, S2, #23
PT 81, S3, #4
PT 81, S3, #18


WEAKEN

1. PT 7, S1, #1 (16)
2. PT 9, S2, #4 (59)
3. PT 9, S2, #7 (60)
4. PT 9, S2, #12 (61)
5. PT 9, S4, #2 (70)
6. PT 9, S4, #22 (76)
7. PT 10, S1, #16 (87)
8. PT 10, S4, #1 (104)
9. PT 10, S4, #9 (106)
10. PT 11, S2, #1 (122)
11. PT 11, S2, #11 (124)
12. PT 11, S2, #19 (127)
13. PT 11, S2, #21 (127)
14. PT 11, S4, #5 (139)
15. PT 11, S4, #11 (141)
16. PT 11, S4, #21 (144)
17. PT 12, S1, #16 (156)
18. PT 12, S4, #4 (173)
19. PT 12, S4, #11 (175) (false binarism)
20. PT 12, S4, #21 (178)
21. PT 13, S2, #1 (190)
22. PT 13, S2, #13 (193)
23. PT 13, S2, #21 (196) (counters a response)
24. PT 13, S4, #12 (209)
25. PT 13, S4, #17 (211)
26. PT 13, S4, #19 (211)
27. PT 14, S2, #12 (227)
28. PT 14, S2, #21 (230)
29. PT 14, S4, #4 (241)
30. PT 14, S4, #6 (242) (account for without supporting)
31. PT 14, S4, #22 (246)
32. PT 14, S4, #25 (247) (counters an objection)
33. PT 15, S2, #7 (264)
34. PT 15, S2, #21 (268) (principle)
35. PT 15, S3, #25 (277)
36. PT 16, S2, #2 (292)
37. PT 16, S2, #5 (293)
38. PT 16, S2, #16 (296) (numbers/percentages)
39. PT 16, S3, #1 (300)
40. PT 16, S3, #6 (301)
41. PT 16, S3, #18 (304)
42. PT 18, S2, #6 (327)
43. PT 18, S2, #21 (332)
44. PT 18, S2, #24 (333)
45. PT 18, S4, #7 (344)
46. PT 18, S4, #14 (345)
47. PT 19, S2, #4 (21)
48. PT 19, S2, #12 (23)
49. PT 19, S4, #9 (38)
50. PT 19, S4, #10 (38)
51. PT 19, S4, #26 (43) (counters a response)
52. PT 20, S1, #2 (50)
53. PT 20, S1, #4 (51)
54. PT 20, S1, #12 (53)
55. PT 20, S4, #3 (70)
56. PT 20, S4, #17 (74) (undermines an objection)
57. PT 20, S4, #25 (77)
58. PT 21, S4, #7 (90)
59. PT 21, S2, #17 (93)
60. PT 21, S3, #9 (98) (strengthen X’s challenge)
61. PT 21, S3, #15 (99) (principle)
62. PT 21, S3, #21 (101)
63. PT 21, S3, #23 (102)
64. PT 22, S2, #4 (127)
65. PT 22, S4, #19 (143)
66. PT 22, S4, #24 (144) (conclusion would not follow if…)
67. PT 22, S4, #26 (145)
68. PT 23, S2, #8 (158)
69. PT 23, S3, #19 (169)
70. PT 24, S3, #6 (203)
71. PT 24, S3, #9 (204)
72. PT 25, S2, #5 (229)
73. PT 25, S2, #15 (233)
74. PT 25, S4, #3 (241)
75. PT 25, S4, #10 (242)
76. PT 25, S4, #24 (246)
77. PT 26, S2, #5 (259)
78. PT 26, S2, #12 (261)
79. PT 26, S3, #6 (267) (counters an objection)
80. PT 26, S3, #14 (270)
81. PT 26, S3, #24 (273) (numbers/percentages)
82. PT 27, S1, #4 (289) (which indicates that criticism of X was based on a misunderstanding of it?)
83. PT 27, S1, #8 (290)
84. PT 27, S1, #10 (291)
85. PT 27, S4, #15 (312)
86. PT 27, S4, #18 (313)
87. PT 28, S1, #5 (323)
88. PT 28, S3, #11 (336) (numbers/percentages)
89. PT 28, S3, #15 (337)
90. PT 28, S3, #17 (338)
91. PT 28, S3, #25 (341)
92. PT 29, S1, #16 (20)
93. PT 29, S1, #24 (23)
94. PT 29, S4, #9 (38)
95. PT 29, S4, #24 (43)
96. PT 30, S2, #1 (54)
97. PT 30, S2, #8 (56)
98. PT 30, S2, #9 (56) (evidence that the given explanation is only a partial one)
99. PT 30, S2, #24 (60) (counters an objection)
100. PT 30, S4, #11 (73)
101. PT 30, S4, #17 (74)
102. PT 30, S4, #24 (77)
103. PT 31, S2, #6 (89)
104. PT 31, S2, #16 (93)
105. PT 31, S2, #19 (93)
106. PT 31, S3, #24 (102)
107. PT 32, S1, #12 (121)
108. PT 32, S4, #2 (138)
109. PT 33 S1, #4 (153)
110. PT 33, S1, #17 (157)
111. PT 33, S1, #25 (159)
112. PT 33, S3, #7 (170)
113. PT 33, S3, #24 (175)
114. PT 34, S2, #12 (197)
115. PT 34, S2, #17 (198)
116. PT 34, S2, #25 (201)
117. PT 34, S3, #6 (203)
118. PT 34, S3, #18 (206) (shows that explanation is at best incomplete)
119. PT 34, S3, #20 (207)
120. PT 35, S1, #4 (221) (counters an objection)
121. PT 35, S1, #8 (222)
122. PT 35, S1, #13 (223)
123. PT 35, S4, #5 (241)
124. PT 35, S4, #20 (245)
125. PT 36, S1, #2 (254)
126. PT 36, S1, #8 (256)
127. PT 36, S1, #25 (261)
128. PT 36, S3, #2 (270)
129. PT 36, S3, #5 (271)
130. PT 37, S2, #4 (297)
131. PT 37, S2, #14 (299)
132. PT 37, S4, #2 (308)
133. PT 37, S4, #11 (311)
134. PT 37, S4, #18 (313)
135. PT 38, S1, #10 (324)
136. PT 38, S1, #17 (327)
137. PT 38, S4, #13 (345)
138. PT 38, S4, #15 (345)
139. PT 43, S2, #6 (20)
140. PT 43, S3, #8 (29)
141. PT 43, S3, #19 (32)
142. PT 44, S2, #4 (20)
143. PT 44, S2, #20 (24)
144. PT 44, S4, #1 (31)
145. PT 44, S4, #5 (32)
146. PT 45, S1, #2 (11)
147. PT 45, S1, #12 (14)
148. PT 45, S1, #16 (15)
149. PT 45, S1, #18 (16)
150. PT 45, S4, #4 (32)
151. PT 46, S2, #8 (20)
152. PT 46, S2, #22 (24)
153. PT 46, S2, #25 (25)
154. PT 46, S3, #6 (27)
155. PT 46, S1, #2 (9)
156. PT 47, S1, #19 (14)
157. PT 47, S1, #22 (15)
158. PT 47, S1, #24 (16) (principle)
159. PT 47, S3, #4 (26)
160. PT 47, S3, #7 (26) (counters an objection)
161. PT 47, S3, #14 (28)
162. PT 47, S3, #24 (31)
163. PT 48, S1, #1 (10)
164. PT 48, S1, #19 (14)
165. PT 48, S4, #9 (32)
166. PT 48, S4, #26 (37)
167. PT 49, S2, #6 (14)
168. PT 49, S2, #8 (14)
169. PT 49, S2, #14 (16)
170. PT 49, S4, #8 (31)
171. PT 50, S2, #2 (18) (counters an objection)
172. PT 50, S4, #5 (31)
173. PT 50, S4, #12 (33)
174. PT 51, S1, #8 (11)
175. PT 51, S1, #25 (16) (correlation/causation)
176. PT 51, S3, #1 (25)
177. JN 07, S2, #5 (7)
178. JN 07, S2, #9 (8)
179. JN 07, S2, #14 (10)
180. JN 07, S3, #15 (18)
181. JN 07, S3, #21 (20)
182. PT 52, S1, #9 (12) (counters an objection)
183. PT 52, S1, #12 (13)
184. PT 52, S1, #21 (16)
185. PT 52, S3, #6 (23)
186. PT 52, S3, #19 (27)
187. PT 53, S1, #3 (10)
188. PT 53, S1, #8 (11)
189. PT 53, S3, #4 (23)
190. PT 53, S3, #9 (24)
191. PT 53, S3, #14 (26)
192. PT 53, S3, #16 (26)
193. PT 54, S2, #3 (18)
194. PT 54, S2, #14 (21)
195. PT 54, S4, #10 (33) (counters an objection)
196. PT 55, S1, #7 (12)
197. PT 55, S1, #9 (12)
198. PT 55, S1, #22 (16)
199. PT 55, S3, #4 (27) (counters an objection)
200. PT 55, S3, #9 (28)
201. PT 55, S3, #22 (32)
202. PT 56, S2, #3 (14)
203. PT 56, S2, #8 (16)
204. PT 56, S3, #20 (27)
205. PT 57, S2, #9 (16)
206. PT 57, S2, #14 (18)
207. PT 57, S2, #17 (19)
208. PT 57, S2, #20 (20)
209. PT 57, S3, #6 (23)
210. PT 57, S3, #11 (24)
211. PT 58, S1, #5 (11)
212. PT 58, S1, #24 (16) (numbers/percentages)
213. PT 58, S4, #2 (30)
214. PT 58, S4, #10 (32)
215. PT 59, S2, #21 (10)
216. PT 59, S2, #25 (12)
217. PT 59, S3, #2 (13)
218. PT 59, S3, #13 (16) (numbers/percentages)
PT 60, S1, #6
PT 60, S1, #13
PT 60, S1, #16
PT 60, S3, #4
PT 60, S3, #13
PT 61, S2, #11
PT 61, S2, #14
PT 61, S2, #20
PT 61, S4, #8
PT 61, S4, #21
PT 62, S2, #22
PT 62, S4, #5
PT 62, S4, #14
PT 63, S1, #2
PT 63, S1, #7
PT 63, S3, #9
PT 63, S3, #16
PT 64, S1, #4
PT 64, S1, #8
PT 64, S1, #10
PT 64, S1, #13
PT 64, S3, #15
PT 65, S1, #5
PT 65, S4, #3
PT 65, S4, #19
PT 66, S2, #5
PT 66, S4, #4
PT 66, S4, #6
PT 66, S4, #8
PT 67, S2, #1
PT 67, S2, #17
PT 67, S4, #6
PT 67, S4, #10
PT 67, S4, #24
PT 68, S2, #4
PT 68, S3, #9
PT 69, S1, #17
PT 69, S1, #22
PT 69, S4, #7
PT 69, S4, #19
PT 70, S1, #16
PT 70, S4, #12
PT 70, S4, #19
PT 71, S1, #13
PT 71, S3, #21
PT 72, S2, #2
PT 72, S2, #10
PT 72, S3, #2
PT 72, S3, #10
PT 73, S2, #9
PT 73, S2, #19
PT 73, S4, #1
PT 73, S4, #17
PT 74, S1, #6
PT 74, S1, #23
PT 74, S4, #24
PT 75, S1, #5
PT 75, S1, #11
PT 75, S3, #13
PT 75, S3, #22
PT 76, S2, #9
PT 76, S2, #12
PT 76, S4, #21
PT 76, S4, #23
PT 77, S2, #4
PT 77, S4, #11
PT 77, S4, #19
PT 78, S1, #10
PT 78, S1, #25
PT 78, S3, #26
PT 79, S1, #21
PT 79, S4, #19
PT 80, S1, #19
PT 80, S4, #25
PT 81, S2, #4
PT 81, S2, #22
PT 81, S3, #16
PT 81, S3, #22

SUFFICIENT ASSUMPTION 
1. PT 7, S1, #4 (17) (ad is misleading if…)
2. PT 7, S4, #4 (37) (ad is misleading if…)
3. PT 9, S2, #16 (62) (hold inconsistent views if…)
4. PT 9, S2, #23 (64) (formal logic)
5. PT 9, S4, #12 (72)
6. PT 11, S2, #22 (128)
7. PT 12, S1, #5 (153) (principle)
8. PT 12, S1, #22 (158) (numbers/percentages)
9. PT 12, S4, #20 (178)
10. PT 14, S2, #13 (227)
11. PT 14, S2, #17 (229)
12. PT 14, S4, #7 (242) (numbers/percentages)
13. PT 14, S4, #12 (243) (conflict of views if…)
14. PT 14, S4, #23 (246)
15. PT 15, S2, #1 (262) (principle)
16. PT 15, S2, #13 (266) (principle)
17. PT 15, S3, #18 (274)
18. PT 18, S4, #12 (345)
19. PT 18, S4, #19 (347) (principle)
20. PT 19, S2, #18 (25) (numbers/percentages)
21. PT 19, S4, #11 (38) (numbers/percentages)
22. PT 20, S1, #5 (51) (principle)
23. PT 20, S4, #12 (72) (principle)
24. PT 21, S2, #20 (94)
25. PT 22, S4, #2 (138)
26. PT 22, S4, #13 (141)
27. PT 23, S2, #5 (157)
28. PT 23, S3, #14 (167)
29. PT 24, S2, #21 (200)
30. PT 24, S2, #24 (201)
31. PT 24, S3, #10 (204) (formal logic)
32. PT 24, S3, #19 (207) (formal logic)
33. PT 25, S4, #18 (245)
34. PT 26, S3, #21 (272)
35. PT 28, S1, #24 (328)
36. PT 29, S1, #20 (21) (numbers/percentages)
37. PT 30, S4, #1 (70)
38. PT 31, S2, #10 (91)
39. PT 32, S1, #5 (119)
40. PT 32, S4, #4 (139)
41. PT 33, S3, #21 (173)
42. PT 33, S3, #23 (174)
43. PT 34, S2, #2 (194)
44. PT 34, S2, #10 (196)
45. PT 35, S1, #20 (225)
46. PT 35, S1, #22 (226) (formal logic)
47. PT 35, S4, #14 (244)
48. PT 35, S4, #19 (245) 49. PT 36, S1, #18 (259)
50. PT 36, S1, #22 (260)
51. PT 36, S1, #26 (261)
52. PT 36, S3, #12 (273)
53. PT 37, S2, #5 (297)
54. PT 37, S4, #9 (310)
55. PT 37, S4, #20 (313)
56. PT 38, S1, #1 (322)
57. PT 38, S4, #16 (346)
58. PT 43, S2, #18 (24)
59. PT 43, S3, #16 (31) (formal logic)
60. PT 44, S2, #13 (22)
61. PT 44, S4, #26 (38)
62. PT 45, S1, #21 (16)
63. PT 45, S1, #23 (16)
64. PT 45, S4, #22 (37)
65. PT 46, S2, #4 (19)
66. PT 46, S2, #23 (24) (formal logic)
67. PT 46, S3, #24 (32)
68. PT 47, S1, #9 (11)
69. PT 47, S1, #12 (12)
70. PT 47, S3, #21 (30)
71. PT 48, S1, #25 (17)
72. PT 48, S4, #8 (32)
73. PT 48, S4, #20 (35) (misleading ad)
74. PT 48, S4, #21 (35)
75. PT 49, S2, #7 (14) (formal logic)
76. PT 49, S2, #19 (18)
77. PT 49, S2, #25 (20)
78. PT 49, S4, #18 (34)
79. PT 49, S4, #22 (35)
80. PT 50, S2, #7 (20)
81. PT 50, S2, #22 (24)
82. PT 50, S4, #13 (33)
83. PT 51, S1, #16 (13)
84. PT 51, S1, #19 (14)
85. PT 51, S3, #20 (30)
86. JN 07, S2, #6 (7)
87. JN 07, S2, #13 (10)
88. JN 07, S2, #15 (10)
89. JN 07, S2, #23 (12)
90. JN 07, S3, #5 (15)
91. PT 52, S1, #17 (14)
92. PT 52, S1, #20 (16)
93. PT 52, S3, #15 (26)
94. PT 53, S1, #20 (16)
95. PT 54, S2, #13 (21)
96. PT 54, S2, #26 (25)
97. PT 54, S4, #22 (36)
98. PT 55, S1, #4 (11)
99. PT 55, S3, #10 (28)
100. PT 55, S3, #21 (32)
101. PT 56, S2, #10 (16)
102. PT 56, S3, #16 (26)
103. PT 57, S2, #7 (16)
104. PT 57, S2, #12 (17)
105. PT 57, S3, #24 (29)
106. PT 58, S1, #12 (13)
107. PT 58, S1, #25 (17)
108. PT 58, S4, #19 (34)
109. PT 58, S4, #24 (37)
110. PT 59, S2, #17 (9)
111. PT 59, S3, #10 (16)
PT 60, S1, #22
PT 60, S3, #3
PT 61, S2, #13
PT 61, S2, #24
PT 61, S4, #13
PT 61, S4, #25
PT 62, S2, #9
PT 62, S2, #15
PT 62, S2, #17
PT 62, S4, #16
PT 62, S4, #18
PT 63, S1, #10
PT 63, S3, #17
PT 63, S3, #24
PT 64, S1, #11
PT 64, S1, #23
PT 64, S3, #21
PT 64, S3, #26
PT 65, S1, #16
PT 66, S2, #6
PT 66, S2, #19
PT 66, S4, #17
PT 66, S4, #20
PT 67, S4, #13
PT 68, S2, #23
PT 68, S3, #15
PT 69, S1, #25
PT 69, S4, #13
PT 69, S4, #21
PT 70, S1, #1
PT 70, S1, #7
PT 70, S4, #22
PT 71, S1, #1
PT 71, S3, #11
PT 71, S3, #14
PT 72, S2, #8
PT 73, S2, #10
PT 73, S2, #12
PT 73, S4, #24
PT 74, S1, #12
PT 74, S1, #20
PT 74, S4, #16
PT 75, S1, #23
PT 75, S3, #15
PT 76, S2, #10
PT 76, S2, #22
PT 76, S4, #1
PT 76, S4, #14
PT 77, S2, #9
PT 77, S2, #15
PT 77, S4, #20
PT 77, S4, #24
PT 78, S3, #10
PT 78, S3, #20
PT 79, S4, #4
PT 79, S4, #10
PT 80, S1, #9
PT 80, S4, #5
PT 80, S4, #14
PT 81, S2, #3
PT 81, S2, #9
PT 81, S3, #20

PARALLEL REASONING
1. PT 7, S1, #13 (19)
2. PT 7, S1, #20 (21) (flawed)
3. PT 7, S4, #14 (40) (flawed)
4. PT 7, S4, #25 (43)
5. PT 9, S2, #1 (58)
6. PT 9, S2, #24 (65)
7. PT 9, S4, #15 (73)
8. PT 9, S4, #24 (77) (flawed)
9. PT 10, S1, #20 (89)
10. PT 10, S1, #25 (91)
11. PT 10, S4, #5 (105) (flawed)
12. PT 10, S4, #12 (107)
13. PT 11, S2, #17 (126) (flawed)
14. PT 11, S2, #25 (129)
15. PT 11, S4, #20 (144) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
16. PT 11, S4, #22 (145)
17. PT 12, S1, #17 (156) (flawed)
18. PT 12, S1, #23 (158)
19. PT 12, S4, #9 (174)
20. PT 12, S4, #23 (179) (flawed)
21. PT 13, S2, #8 (192)
22. PT 13, S2, #23 (196) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
23. PT 13, S4, #15 (210) (flawed)
24. PT 13, S4, #24 (213)
25. PT 14, S2, #15 (228) (functional equivalency)
26. PT 14, S2, #25 (231) (flawed) (numbers/percentages)
27. PT 14, S4, #8 (242)
28. PT 14, S4, #14 (244) (flawed)
29. PT 15, S2, #4 (263) (flawed)
30. PT 15, S2, #18 (267) (formal logic)
31. PT 15, S3, #13 (273)
32. PT 15, S3, #22 (276) (flawed)
33. PT 16, S2, #7 (294) (flawed)
34. PT 16, S2, #19 (297)
35. PT 16, S3, #15 (303) (flawed)
36. PT 16, S3, #22 (306)
37. PT 18, S2, #13 (330)
38. PT 18, S2, #17 (331) (flawed)
39. PT 18, S4, #3 (343) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
40. PT 18, S4, #20 (348)
41. PT 19, S2, #20 (26)
42. PT 19, S2, #22 (26) (flawed)
43. PT 19, S4, #21 (41) (flawed)
44. PT 19, S4, #24 (43)
45. PT 20, S1, #17 (54) (flawed)
46. PT 20, S1, #19 (55)
47. PT 20, S4, #15 (73)
48. PT 20, S4, #20 (75) (flawed)
49. PT 21, S2, #15 (92) (functional equivalency)
50. PT 21, S2, #21 (94) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
51. PT 21, S3, #22 (102)
52. PT 21, S3, #25 (103) (flawed)
53. PT 22, S2, #16 (130)
54. PT 22, S2, #23 (132) (flawed)
55. PT 22, S4, #6 (139)
56. PT 22, S4, #20 (143)
57. PT 23, S2, #23 (162) (flawed)
58. PT 23, S2, #25 (163)
59. PT 23, S3, #18 (168)
60. PT 23, S3, #23 (170) (flawed)
61. PT 24, S2, #5 (195) (flawed)
62. PT 24, S2, #13 (197)
63. PT 24, S3, #16 (206) (flawed)
64. PT 24, S3, #21 (207)
65. PT 25, S2, #2 (228) (flawed)
66. PT 25, S2, #22 (235)
67. PT 25, S4, #12 (243) (flawed) (circular reasoning)
68. PT 25, S4, #20 (245)
69. PT 26, S2, #16 (262)
70. PT 26, S2, #20 (263)
71. PT 26, S3, #13 (269) (flawed)
72. PT 27, S1, #11 (291) (flawed)
73. PT 27, S1, #26 (295)
74. PT 27, S4, #13 (311) (flawed)
75. PT 28, S1, #3 (322)
76. PT 28, S1, #13 (325)
77. PT 28, S3, #21 (339)
78. PT 28, S3, #26 (341)
79. PT 29, S1, #13 (19) (LEAST)
80. PT 29, S1, #23 (22)
81. PT 29, S4, #21 (42) (flawed) (formal logic)
82. PT 30, S2, #6 (55) (flawed)
83. PT 30, S2, #14 (58)
84. PT 30, S4, #9 (72)
85. PT 30, S4, #25 (77) (flawed)
86. PT 31, S2, #21 (94) (flawed)
87. PT 31, S2, #23 (95)
88. PT 31, S3, #18 (100)
90. PT 31, S3, #23 (102) (flawed)
91. PT 32, S1, #16 (123)
92. PT 32, S1, #22 (125)
93. PT 32, S4, #21 (144) (flawed)
94. PT 33, S1, #23 (158)
95. PT 33, S3, #18 (173) (flawed)
96. PT 33, S3, #22 (174)
97. PT 34, S2, #6 (195)
98. PT 34, S2, #24 (201) (flawed)
99. PT 34, S3, #23 (208) (flawed)
100. PT 34, S3, #25 (209) (exchange)
101. PT 35, S1, #24 (227) (flawed)
102. PT 35, S4, #6 (241) (flawed)
103. PT 35, S4, #23 (246)
104. PT 36, S1, #21 (260) (flawed)
105. PT 36, S3, #19 (275) (flawed)
106. PT 37, S2, #21 (301) (flawed)
107. PT 37, S2, #26 (303)
108. PT 37, S4, #4 (309) (flawed)
109. PT 37, S4, #14 (312)
110. PT 38, S1, #16 (326) (flawed)
111. PT 38, S1, #22 (328)
112. PT 38, S4, #17 (346) (flawed)
113. PT 43, S2, #11 (22)
114. PT 43, S2, #24 (26)
115. PT 43, S3, #22 (33) (flawed)
116. PT 43, S3, #25 (34)
117. PT 44, S2, #22 (25) (flawed)
118. PT 44, S4, #19 (35) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
119. PT 44, S4, #21 (36)
120. PT 45, S1, #11 (14) (flawed)
121. PT 45, S1, #25 (18)
122. PT 45, S4, #20 (36) (flawed)
123. PT 46, S2, #18 (23)
124. PT 46, S2, #20 (23) (flawed)
125. PT 46, S3, #19 (30) (flawed)
126. PT 47, S1, #15 (13)
127. PT 47, S1, #21 (15) (flawed)
128. PT 47, S3, #25 (32) (flawed)
129. PT 48, S1, #12 (13)
130. PT 48, S1, #23 (16) (flawed)
131. PT 48, S4, #4 (31) (flawed)
132. PT 48, S4, #22 (36)
133. PT 49, S2, #24 (19)
134. PT 49, S2, #26 (20) (flawed)
135. PT 49, S4, #17 (33)
136. PT 49, S4, #24 (36) (flawed) (numbers/percentages)
137. PT 50, S2, #17 (23) (flawed)
138. PT 50, S4, #14 (34)
139. PT 50, S4, #24 (37) (flawed)
140. PT 51, S1, #5 (10)
141. PT 51, S1, #20 (15) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
142. PT 51, S3, #22 (31) (flawed)
143. PT 51, S3, #24 (32)
144. JN 07, S2, #2 (6)
145. JN 07, S2, #12 (9)
146. JN 07, S3, #20 (20) (flawed)
147. PT 52, S1, #3 (11)
148. PT 52, S1, #16 (14) (flawed)
149. PT 52, S3, #24 (29) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
150. PT 53, S1, #19 (15)
151. PT 53, S1, #21 (16) (flawed)
152. PT 53, S3, #23 (28)
153. PT 54, S2, #21 (24) (flawed)
154. PT 54, S2, #23 (24)
155. PT 54, S4, #8 (32) (flawed)
156. PT 54, S4, #25 (37)
157. PT 55, S1, #1 (10) (flawed)
158. PT 55, S3, #15 (30)
159. PT 55, S3, #23 (33) (flawed)
160. PT 56, S2, #7 (15) (flawed)
161. PT 56, S3, #14 (25) (flawed)
162. PT 56, S3, #24 (29)
163. PT 57, S2, #8 (16) (flawed)
164. PT 57, S2, #19 (19)
165. PT 57, S3, #15 (26) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
166. PT 57, S3, #20 (28)
167. PT 58, S1, #7 (12) (flawed)
168. PT 58, S4, #22 (36) (flawed) (necessary/sufficient)
169. PT 59, S2, #9 (7) (flawed)
170. PT 59, S2, #16 (9)
171. PT 59, S3, #15 (17) (flawed)

(Starting with PT60, I've separated Parallel Reasoning and Parallel Flaw questions into separate categories.)


Parallel Reasoning
PT 60, S1, #17
PT 60, S3, #6
PT 61, S4, #9
PT 62, S4, #25
PT 63, S1, #21
PT 63, S3, #20
PT 64, S1, #21
PT 64, S3, #25
PT 65, S4, #17
PT 66, S2, #16
PT 66, S4, #13[
PT 67, S2, #19
PT 67, S4, #19
PT 68, S2, #9
PT 68, S3, #22
PT 69, S4, #10
PT 70, S1, #19
PT 70, S4, #17
PT 71, S1, #14
PT 71, S3, #24
PT 72, S2, #26
PT 72, S3, #23
PT 73, S2, #17
PT 73, S4, #21
PT 74, S1, #19
PT 74, S4, #19
PT 75, S1, #25
PT 75, S3, #9
PT 76, S4, #22
PT 77, S4, #23
PT 78, S1, #23
PT 78, S3, #13
PT 79, S4, #16
PT 80, S1, #14
PT 80, S4, #19
PT 81, S2, #21
PT 81, S3, #25


Parallel Flaw

PT 60, S1, #21
PT 60, S3, #23
PT 61, S2, #23
PT 61, S4, #26
PT 62, S2, #7
PT 62, S4, #9
PT 63, S1, #24
PT 63, S3, #25
PT 64, S1, #9
PT 64, S3, #23
PT 65, S1, #11
PT 65, S4, #24
PT 66, S2, #24
PT 66, S4, #24
PT 67, S2, #23
PT 67, S4, #25
PT 68, S2, #25
PT 68, S3, #24
PT 69, S1, #14
PT 69, S4, #14
PT 70, S1, #10
PT 70, S4, #23
PT 71, S1, #23
PT 71, S3, #15
PT 72, S2, #22
PT 72, S3, #25
PT 73, S2, #7
PT 73, S4, #18
PT 74, S1, #25
PT 74, S4, #25
PT 75, S1, #22
PT 75, S3, #14
PT 76, S2, #21
PT 76, S4, #6
PT 77, S2, #5
PT 77, S4, #25
PT 78, S1, #21
PT 78, S3, #25
PT 79, S1, #26
PT 80, S1, #24
PT 80, S4, #23
PT 81, S2, #24
PT 81, S3, #11


STRENGTHEN


1. PT 7, S1, #15 (20)
2. PT 7, S1, #23 (22) (numbers/percentages)
3. PT 7, S4, #1 (36)
3. PT 7, S4, #5 (37) (principle)
4. PT 9, S2, #9 (60)
5. PT 9, S4, #17 (74)
6. PT 9, S4, #21 (75) (principle)
7. PT 10, S1, #9 (86) (LEAST)
8. PT 10, S4, #2 (104)
9. PT 10, S4, #11 (107)
10. PT 11, S2, #6 (123)
11. PT 11, S2, #10 (124) (principle)
12. PT 11, S4, #6 (139) (principle)
13. PT 11, S4, #18 (143)
14. PT 12, S1, #11 (155)
15. PT 12, S1, #15 (156)
16. PT 12, S1, #19 (157) (numbers/percentages)
17. PT 13, S2, #5 (191)
18. PT 13, S2, #16 (194) (principle)
19. PT 13, S4, #23 (213)
20. PT 14, S2, #6 (225)
21. PT 14, S2, #7 (226)
22. PT 15, S2, #3 (262)
23. PT 15, S3, #6 (271) (principle)
24. PT 15, S3, #8 (272)
25. PT 15, S3, #10 (272)
26. PT 15, S3, #23 (276)
27. PT 16, S2, #18 (297)
28. PT 16, S2, #21 (298)
29. PT 16, S3, #13 (303)
30. PT 16, S3, #23 (306) (principle)
31. PT 18, S2, #2 (326) (formal logic)
32. PT 18, S2, #16 (330)
33. PT 18, S4, #1 (342) (principle)
34. PT 18, S4, #5 (343)
35. PT 18, S4, #16 (346) (principle)
36. PT 19, S2, #21 (26)
37. PT 19, S4, #7 (37)
38. PT 19, S4, #15 (39)
39. PT 20, S1, #9 (52)
40. PT 20, S4, #24 (77) (principle)
41. PT 21, S2, #16 (92) (principle)
42. PT 21, S2, #23 (95)
43. PT 21, S3, #17 (100) (principle)
44. PT 22, S2, #9 (128)
45. PT 22, S4, #8 (140)
46. PT 23, S2, #14 (159) (provides strongest defense)
47. PT 23, S2, #16 (160)
48. PT 23, S2, #18 (160)
49. PT 23, S3, #5 (165) (principle)
50. PT 23, S3, #10 (166)
51. PT 23, S3, #13 (167)
52. PT 24, S2, #9 (196) (principle)
53. PT 24, S2, #25 (201) (principle)
54. PT 24, S3, #20 (207) (principle)
55. PT 24, S3, #23 (208)
56. PT 24, S3, #26 (209) (principle)
57. PT 25, S2, #4 (229) (principle)
58. PT 25, S2, #10 (231)
59. PT 25, S2, #23 (235) (principle) (necessary/sufficient)
60. PT 25, S4, #6 (241)
61. PT 25, S4, #7 (242)
62. PT 26, S2, #11 (260)
63. PT 26, S2, #23 (264) (principle)
64. PT 26, S3, #3 (266)
65. PT 27, S1, #5 (289)
66. PT 27, S1, #16 (293)
67. PT 27, S1, #18 (293)
68. PT 27, S1, #24 (295) (principle)
69. PT 27, S4, #2 (308)
70. PT 28, S1, #4 (323) (principle)
71. PT 28, S1, #15 (326)
72. PT 28, S1, #26 (329) (LEAST)
73. PT 28, S3, #6 (335)
74. PT 28, S3, #9 (336)
75. PT 28, S3, #18 (338) (principle)
76. PT 28, S3, #24 (340)
77. PT 29, S1, #22 (22) (principle)
78. PT 29, S4, #1 (36)
79. PT 29, S4, #7 (38) (principle)
80. PT 29, S4, #11 (39)
81. PT 30, S2, #3 (55)
82. PT 30, S2, #4 (55) (numbers/percentages)
83. PT 30, S2, #21 (60)
84. PT 30, S4, #12 (73)
85. PT 30, S4, #15 (74)
86. PT 30, S4, #18 (75)
87. PT 30, S4, #20 (75)
88. PT 30, S4, #23 (76) (principle)
89. PT 31, S2, #5 (89) (resolve the paradox)
90. PT 31, S2, #24 (95) (principle)
91. PT 31, S3, #4 (97) (principle)
92. PT 31, S3, #9 (98)
93. PT 31, S3, #26 (103) (principle)
94. PT 32, S4, #8 (140) (principle)
95. PT 32, S4, #9 (140)
96. PT 32, S4, #11 (141)
97. PT 33, S1, #1 (152)
98. PT 33, S1, #6 (153)
99. PT 33, S1, #21 (158) (principle)
100. PT 33, S3, #4 (169)
101. PT 33, S3, #6 (169) (principle)
102. PT 33, S3, #9 (170)
103. PT 33, S3, #20 (173)
104. PT 34, S2, #14 (197)
105. PT 34, S2, #20 (199) (principle)
106. PT 34, S3, #16 (206) (principle)
107. PT 34, S3, #21 (207) (numbers/percentages)
108. PT 34, S3, #24 (208)
109. PT 35, S1, #2 (220) (principle)
110. PT 35, S4, #10 (242)
111. PT 35, S4, #11 (243) (principle)
112. PT 36, S1, #15 (258) (principle)
113. PT 36, S3, #7 (272)
114. PT 36, S3, #11 (273)
115. PT 36, S3, #20 (276) (principle)
116. PT 36, S3, #26 (277)
117. PT 37, S2, #1 (296)
118. PT 37, S2, #6 (297)
119. PT 37, S2, #22 (302) (principle)
120. PT 37, S2, #24 (302) (principle)
121. PT 37, S4, #21 (314) (principle)
122. PT 37, S4, #25 (315)
123. PT 38, S1, #3 (322) (principle)
124. PT 38, S1, #4 (322)
125. PT 38, S4, #4 (343) (principle)
126. PT 43, S2, #14 (22)
127. PT 43, S2, #21 (25) (principle)
128. PT 43, S3, #7 (29) (principle)
129. PT 43, S3, #10 (29)
130. PT 43, S3, #11 (30) (principle)

131. PT 44, S2, #7 (30)
132. PT 44, S2, #15 (23)

133. PT 44, S4, #2 (31) (principle)
134. PT 44, S4, #14 (34)
135. PT 45, S1, #14 (15)
136. PT 45, S1, #19 (16)
137. PT 45, S1, #26 (18)
138. PT 45, S4, #3 (32) (principle)
139. PT 45, S4, #7 (33)

140. PT 45, S4, #25 (38) (principle)
141. PT 46, S2, #5 (19) (principle)
142. PT 46, S2, #16 (22)
143. PT 46, S2, #19 (23)
144. PT 46, S3, #22 (32) (numbers/percentages)

145. PT 47, S1, #3 (9) (principle)
146. PT 47, S1, #11 (11)
147. PT 47, S1, #26 (16)

148. PT 47, S3, #2 (25)

149. PT 47, S3, #26 (32) (principle)
150. PT 48, S1, #3 (10)
151. PT 48, S1, #7 (11)

152. PT 48, S1, #9 (12) (principle)
153. PT 48, S1, #10 (12)

154. PT 48, S1 #16 (14)
155. PT 48, S1, #18 (14) (principle)
156. PT 48, S4, #2 (30)

157. PT 49, S2, #15 (17) (principle)

158. PT 49, S4, #21 (35) (principle)
159. PT 50, S2, #12 (21) (principle)
160. PT 50, S2, #13 (21)
161. PT 50, S4, #9 (32)
162. PT 50, S4, #18 (35) (principle)
163. PT 50, S4, #23 (36)
164. PT 51, S1, #24 (16)
165. PT 51, S3, #3 (25)
166. PT 51, S3, #13 (28) (principle)
167. PT 51, S3, #25 (32)
168. JN 07, S3, #13 (17)
169. JN 07, S3, #19 (19)
170. JN 07, S3, #24 (21) (principle)
171. PT 52, S1, #4 (11)
172. PT 52, S1, #8 (12) (principle)
173. PT 52, S1, #19 (15) (principle)
174. PT 52, S3, #3 (22)
175. PT 53, S1, #6 (11)
176. PT 53, S1, #10 (12)
177. PT 53, S3, #1 (22)
178. PT 53, S3, #11 (25)
179. PT 53, S3, #12 (25) (principle)
180. PT 53, S3, #25 (29) (principle)
181. PT 54, S2, #24 (25)
182. PT 54, S4, #1 (30)
183. PT 54, S4, #9 (32) (principle)
184. PT 54, S4, #20 (35)
185. PT 55, S1, #6 (11)
186. PT 55, S1, #23 (16)
187. PT 55, S3, #14 (29)
188. PT 56, S2, #14 (17)
189. PT 56, S2, #16 (18) (principle)
190. PT 56, S2, #24 (21)
191. PT 56, S3, #3 (22) (principle)
192. PT 56, S3, #8 (24)
193. PT 56, S3, #12 (25) (principle)
194. PT 56, S3, #13 (25)
195. PT 57, S2, #5 (15)
196. PT 57, S2, #22 (20)
197. PT 57, S3, #9 (24)
198. PT 57, S3, #19 (27)
199. PT 58, S1, #3 (11)
200. PT 58, S4, #23 (36)
201. PT 59, S2, #1 (5)
202. PT 59, S2, #3 (6)
203. PT 59, S2, #5 (6)
204. PT 59, S2, #22 (10)
205. PT 59, S2, #13 (8) (principle)
206. PT 59, S3, #11 (16)
PT 60, S1, #11
PT 60, S3, #2
PT 60, S3, #9
PT 60, S3, #21
PT 61, S2, #6
PT 61, S2, #22
PT 61, S4, #4
PT 62, S2, #2
PT 62, S2, #3
PT 62, S2, #16
PT 62, S4, #3
PT 62, S4, #22
PT 63, S1, #11
PT 63, S1, #16
PT 63, S3, #21
PT 64, S1, #17
PT 64, S1, #22
PT 64, S3, #9
PT 64, S3, #17
PT 64, S3, #24
PT 65, S1, #1
PT 65, S1, #13
PT 65, S1, #19
PT 65, S4, #15
PT 65, S4, #22
PT 66, S2, #3
PT 66, S2, #17
PT 66, S4, #2
PT 66, S4, #12
PT 67, S2, #3
PT 67, S4, #4
PT 68, S2, #13
PT 68, S3, #7
PT 68, S3, #17
PT 69, S1, #1
PT 69, S1, #13
PT 69, S4, #23
PT 70, S1, #3
PT 70, S1, #25
PT 70, S4, #1
PT 70, S4, #4
PT 71, S1, #6
PT 71, S1, #12
PT 71, S3, #4
PT 71, S3, #8
PT 71, S3, #16
PT 71, S3, #25
PT 72, S2, #3
PT 72, S2, #7
PT 72, S2, #23
PT 72, S2, #25
PT 72, S3, #6
PT 72, S3, #8
PT 72, S3, #12
PT 73, S2, #22
PT 73, S4, #20
PT 74, S1, #2
PT 74, S1, #4
PT 74, S1, #10
PT 74, S1, #17
PT 74, S4, #3
PT 74, S4, #26
PT 75, S1, #9
PT 75, S1, #15
PT 75, S1, #21
PT 75, S3, #6
PT 75, S3, #12
PT 75, S3, #21
PT 76, S2, #14
PT 76, S2, #25
PT 76, S4, #3
PT 76, S4, #8
PT 77, S2, #1
PT 77, S2, #2
PT 77, S2, #7
PT 77, S2, #21
PT 77, S4, #4
PT 77, S4, #5
PT 77, S4, #17
PT 78, S1, #12
PT 78, S1, #16
PT 78, S3, #2
PT 78, S3, #21
PT 79, S1, #10
PT 79, S1, #12
PT 79, S1, #23
PT 79, S4, #14
PT 79, S4, #22
PT 80, S1, #11
PT 80, S1, #23
PT 80, S4, #4
PT 80, S4, #7
PT 81, S2, #13
PT 81, S3, #12


RESOLVE THE PARADOX
 
1. PT 7, S1, #11 (19)
2. PT 7, S1, #25 (23)
3. PT 7, S4, #17 (41)
4. PT 9, S2, #6 (59)
5. PT 9, S2, #8 (60)
6. PT 9, S4, #3 (70)
7. PT 10, S1, #2 (84)
8. PT 10, S1, #14 (87)
9. PT 10, S4, #17 (109)
10. PT 10, S4, #23 (111) (LEAST helpful)
11. PT 11, S2, #23 (128)
12. PT 11, S4, #1 (138)
13. PT 12, S1, #4 (153)
14. PT 12, S1, #7 (154)
15. PT 12, S1, #12 (155)
16. PT 12, S4, #12 (175)
17. PT 12, S4, #22 (178)
18. PT 13, S2, #3 (190)
19. PT 13, S2, #15 (194)
20. PT 13, S2, #19 (195)
21. PT 13, S4, #2 (206)
22. PT 13, S4, #10 (208)
23. PT 13, S4, #13 (209)
24. PT 14, S2, #1 (224)
25. PT 14, S2, #3 (225)
26. PT 14, S4, #1 (240)
27. PT 14, S4, #3 (241)
28. PT 15, S2, #5 (263)
29. PT 15, S2, #10 (265)
30. PT 15, S3, #20 (275)
31. PT 16, S2, #1 (292) (numbers/percentages)
32. PT 16, S2, #4 (293)
33. PT 16, S2, #15 (296)
34. PT 16, S3, #10 (302)
35. PT 16, S3, #17 (304)
36. PT 18, S2, #11 (329) (numbers/percentages)
37. PT 18, S2, #19 (332)
38. PT 18, S2, #22 (333)
39. PT 18, S4, #13 (345)
40. PT 18, S4, #15 (346)
41. PT 19, S2, #5 (21)
42. PT 19, S4, #20 (41)
43. PT 19, S4, #23 (42)
44. PT 20, S1, #18 (55)
45. PT 21, S2, #2 (88)
46. PT 21, S2, #4 (89)
47. PT 21, S3, #3 (96)
48. PT 21, S3, #7 (97)
49. PT 22, S2, #21 (131) (numbers/percentages)
50. PT 22, S4, #17 (142)
51. PT 23, S2, #22 (161)
52. PT 23, S3, #2 (164)
53. PT 24, S2, #18 (199) (numbers/percentages)
54. PT 25, S2, #14 (232)
55. PT 25, S2, #17 (233) (LEAST helpful)
56. PT 25, S4, #13 (244)
57. PT 26, S2, #14 (261)
58. PT 26, S2, #18 (263)
59. PT 26, S3, #1 (266)
60. PT 26, S3, #18 (271)
61. PT 27, S1, #7 (290)
62. PT 27, S4, #8 (310)
63. PT 28, S1, #8 (324)
64. PT 28, S1, #17 (326)
65. PT 28, S3, #3 (334)
66. PT 29, S1, #4 (16)
67. PT 29, S1, #10 (18)
68. PT 31, S2, #11 (91)
69. PT 31, S3, #2 (96)
70. PT 31, S3, #7 (97)
71. PT 32, S1, #2 (118)
72. PT 32, S4, #5 (139)
73. PT 32, S4, #17 (142)
74. PT 33, S1, #8 (154) (LEAST helpful)
75. PT 33, S1, #14 (156)
76. PT 33, S3, #1 (168)
77. PT 34, S2, #5 (195)
78. PT 34, S2, #7 (196)
79. PT 35, S1, #21 (226)
80. PT 35, S1, #25 (227)
81. PT 35, S4, #4 (241)
82. PT 35, S4, #12 (243)
83. PT 36, S1, #9 (257)
84. PT 36, S1, #13 (258)
85. PT 36, S3, #1 (270)
86. PT 37, S4, #5 (309)
87. PT 38, S1, #9 (324)
88. PT 43, S2, #3 (19)
89. PT 43, S2, #15 (23)
90. PT 43, S2, #25 (26)
91. PT 43, S3, #13 (31)
92. PT 44, S2, #3 (19)
93. PT 44, S2, #10 (21)
94. PT 44, S4, #25 (38)
95. PT 45, S4, #5 (32)
96. PT 46, S2, #6 (19)
97. PT 46, S2, #1 (26)
98. PT 47, S1, #6 (10)
99. PT 48, S1, #22 (15)
100. PT 48, S4, #7 (32)
101. PT 48, S4, #19 (35)
102. PT 48, S4, #24 (36)
103. PT 49, S2, #2 (13)
104. PT 49, S4, #11 (31)
105. PT 50, S2, #8 (20)
106. PT 50, S2, #21 (24)
107. PT 50, S4, #16 (34)
108. PT 51, S1, #3 (9)
109. PT 51, S1, #22 (15)
110. PT 51, S3, #8 (26)
111. PT 51, S3, #10 (27)
112. JN 07, S2, #25 (13)
113. PT 52, S1, #14 (14)
114. PT 52, S3, #20 (27)
115. PT 52, S3, #22 (28)
116. PT 54, S2, #4 (18)
117. PT 54, S4, #6 (31)
118. PT 54, S4, #13 (34)
119. PT 54, S4, #21 (36)
120. PT 55, S1, #13 (13)
121. PT 55, S3, #1 (26)
122. PT 56, S2, #13 (17)
123. PT 56, S2, #22 (20)
124. PT 56, S3, #7 (23)
125. PT 57, S2, #3 (15)
126. PT 57, S3, #1 (22)
127. PT 57, S3, #4 (23)
128. PT 57, S3, #7 (23)
129. PT 58, S1, #17 (14) (numbers/percentages)
130. PT 58, S4, #1 (30)
131. PT 58, S4, #7 (31)
132. PT 58, S4, #20 (35)
133. PT 59, S2, #11 (8)
134. PT 59, S3, #1 (13)
135. PT 59, S3, #4 (14)
PT 60, S1, #5
PT 60, S1, #9
PT 60, S3, #1
PT 61, S2, #12
PT 61, S2, #19
PT 61, S2, #25
PT 61, S4, #12
PT 61, S4, #14
PT 62, S2, #4
PT 62, S2, #20
PT 62, S4, #7
PT 62, S4, #17
PT 62, S4, #26
PT 63, S1, #4
PT 63, S3, #8
PT 63, S3, #12
PT 63, S3, #26
PT 64, S1, #6
PT 64, S3, #8
PT 64, S3, #13
PT 65, S1, #12
PT 65, S4, #1
PT 65, S4, #10
PT 66, S2, #23
PT 66, S4, #10
PT 66, S4, #15
PT 66, S4, #18
PT 67, S2, #2
PT 67, S2, #4
PT 67, S4, #3
PT 67, S4, #23
PT 68, S2, #3
PT 68, S2, #6
PT 68, S3, #6
PT 68, S3, #14
PT 69, S1, #15
PT 69, S4, #5
PT 70, S1, #5
PT 70, S1, #12
PT 70, S4, #7
PT 70, S4, #13
PT 71, S1, #20
PT 71, S3, #3
PT 71, S3, #26
PT 72, S2, #9
PT 72, S2, #11
PT 72, S3, #1
PT 72, S3, #5
PT 73, S2, #2
PT 73, S2, #24
PT 73, S4, #15
PT 73, S4, #22
PT 74, S1, #9
PT 74, S1, #15
PT 74, S4, #9
PT 74, S4, #12
PT 75, S1, #6
PT 75, S1, #19
PT 75, S3, #5
PT 76, S2, #7
PT 76, S2, #11
PT 76, S2, #20
PT 76, S4, #25
PT 77, S2, #19
PT 77, S4, #3
PT 77, S4, #21
PT 78, S1, #17
PT 78, S3, #9
PT 78, S3, #16
PT 79, S1, #1
PT 79, S1, #3
PT 79, S1, #5
PT 79, S4, #1
PT 79, S4, #3
PT 80, S1, #1
PT 80, S1, #8
PT 80, S1, #12
PT 80, S4, #3
PT 80, S4, #13
PT 81, S2, #1
PT 81, S2, #12
PT 81, S3, #2
PT 81, S3, #6


METHOD OF REASONING

1. PT 7, S1, #6 (17)
2. PT 7, S1, #7 (18)
3. PT 7, S4, #16 (41)
4. PT 7, S4, #20 (42)
5. PT 7, S4, #21 (42)
6. PT 9, S2, #11 (61)
7. PT 9, S2, #15 (62)
8. PT 9, S4, #9 (72)
9. PT 10, S1, #4 (84)
10. PT 10, S1, #12 (86)
11. PT 10, S4, #25 (111)
12. PT 11, S2, #3 (122)
13. PT 11, S2, #8 (124)
14. PT 11, S2, #14 (125)
15. PT 11, S4, #10 (141)
16. PT 11, S4, #12 (141)
17. PT 12, S1, #6 (153)
18. PT 12, S4, #14 (176)
19. PT 13, S2, #2 (190)
20. PT 13, S2, #17 (194)
21. PT 13, S4, #1 (206)
22. PT 13, S4, #6 (207)
23. PT 14, S2, #8 (226)
24. PT 14, S4, #16 (244)
25. PT 14, S4, #24 (247)
26. PT 15, S2, #24 (269)
27. PT 15, S3, #15 (274)
28. PT 15, S3, #17 (274) (relationship between two arguments)
29. PT 16, S2, #17 (297) (relationship between two arguments)
30. PT 16, S2, #23 (299)
31. PT 16, S3, #7 (302) (relationship between two arguments)
32. PT 16, S3, #20 (305)
33. PT 16, S3, #25 (307)
34. PT 18, S2 #1 (326)
35. PT 18, S2, #7 (328)
36. PT 18, S2, #12 (329)
37. PT 18, S4, #21 (348) (relationship between two arguments)
38. PT 19, S2, #6 (21)
39. PT 19, S2, #8 (22)
40. PT 19, S2, #11 (23)
41. PT 19, S4, #2 (36)
42. PT 19, S4, #18 (40)
43. PT 19, S4, #25 (43)
44. PT 20, S1, #8 (52)
45. PT 20, S1, #21 (56)
46. PT 20, S1, #25 (57)
47. PT 20, S4, #4 (70)
48. PT 21, S2, #9 (90)
49. PT 21, S2, #12 (91)
50. PT 21, S2, #24 (95)
51. PT 21, S3, #14 (99)
52. PT 21, S3, #20 (101)
53. PT 22, S2, #3 (126)
54. PT 22, S2, #11 (128)
55. PT 22, S2, #13 (129)
56. PT 22, S4, #23 (144)
57. PT 23, S2, #1 (156)
58. PT 23, S2, #3 (156)
59. PT 23, S2, #15 (159)
60. PT 23, S3, #8 (166)
61. PT 24, S2, #3 (194)
62. PT 24, S3, #3 (203)
63. PT 24, S3, #17 (206)
64. PT 25, S4, #19 (245)
65. PT 25, S4, #21 (246)
66. PT 26, S3, #2 (266)
67. PT 26, S3, #16 (270)
68. PT 27, S1, #6 (290)
69. PT 27, S4, #12 (311)
70. PT 27, S4, #21 (314)
71. PT 28, S1, #7 (323)
72. PT 28, S3, #7 (335)
73. PT 28, S3, #10 (336) (necessary/sufficient)
74. PT 29, S1, #2 (16)
75. PT 29, S1, #12 (19)
76. PT 30, S2, #7 (56)
77. PT 30, S4, #16 (74)
78. PT 31, S3, #20 (101)
79. PT 32, S1, #8 (120)
80. PT 32, S4, #1 (138)
81. PT 33, S1, #2 (152)
82. PT 33, S3, #12 (171)
83. PT 34, S2, #8 (196)
84. PT 34, S3, #8 (204)
85. PT 35, S1, #5 (221)
86. PT 35, S1, #11 (223)
87. PT 35, S4, #25 (247)
88. PT 36, S1, #1 (254)
89. PT 36, S1, #7 (256)
90. PT 36, S3, #8 (272)
91. PT 36, S3, #10 (273) (relationship between two arguments)
92. PT 36, S3, #24 (277)
93. PT 37, S2, #10 (298)
94. PT 37, S2, #13 (299)
95. PT 37, S4, #10 (311)
96. PT 37, S4, #24 (315) (relationship between two arguments)
97. PT 45, S1, #4 (12)
98. PT 45, S1, #7 (12)
99. PT 45, S4, #12 (34)
100. PT 46, S2, #17 (21)
101. PT 46, S3, #10 (28)
102. PT 47, S1, #10 (11)
103. PT 47, S3, #20 (30)
104. PT 49, S4, #15 (33)
105. JN 07, S2, #20 (12) (numbers/percentages)
106. PT 52, S3, #5 (23)
107. PT 53, S3, #24 (29)
108. PT 54, S2, #10 (20)
109. PT 54, S4, #2 (30)
110. PT 55, S1, #3 (10)
111. PT 56, S2, #9 (16)
112. PT 56, S2, #11 (16)
113. PT 56, S3, #6 (23)
114. PT 57, S3, #5 (23)
115. PT 58, S1, #6 (11)
116. PT 58, S1, #26 (17)
117. PT 58, S4, #12 (33)
118. PT 59, S3, #14 (17)
119. PT 59, S3, #23 (19)
PT 60, S1, #2
PT 60, S1, #25
PT 61, S2, #4
PT 62, S2, #14

PT 62, S4, #21
PT 63, S1, #17
PT 63, S3, #19
PT 64, S1, #3
PT 65, S4, #16
PT 66, S4, #25
PT 67, S2, #12
PT 67, S4, #12
PT 68, S2, #26
PT 68, S3, #20
PT 69, S1, #23
PT 69, S4, #4
PT 70, S4, #8
PT 70, S4, #26
PT 71, S1, #2
PT 71, S1, #9


PRINCIPLE

1. PT 9, S2, #18 (63)
2. PT 9, S4, #11 (72)
3. PT 10, S1, #23 (90)
4. PT 10, S4, #6 (105)
5. PT 10, S4, #15 (108)
6. PT 12, S4, #13 (176)
7. PT 12, S4, #18 (177)
8. PT 13, S4, #22 (212) (violated)
9. PT 14, S4, #2 (240)
10. PT 16, S2, #8 (294) (violated)
11. PT 16, S2, #12 (295)
12. PT 19, S2, #10 (22)
13. PT 22, S4, #7 (140)
14. PT 23, S2, #13 (159)
15. PT 23, S3, #24 (170) (necessary/sufficient)
16. PT 24, S2, #22 (200)
17. PT 24, S3, #24 (208) (necessary/sufficient)
18. PT 25, S2, #8 (231)
19. PT 25, S2, #11 (232)
20. PT 25, S2, #25 (235)
21. PT 25, S4, #5 (241)
22. PT 25, S4, #14 (244)
23. PT 26, S2, #2 (258)
24. PT 26, S3, #23 (272)
25. PT 26, S3, #25 (273) (parallelism)
26. PT 27, S4, #1 (308)
27. PT 27, S4, #3 (309)
28. PT 28, S1, #10 (324) (necessary/sufficient)
29. PT 28, S3, #23 (340)
30. PT 29, S1, #19 (21)
31. PT 29, S4, #10 (38)
32. PT 29, S4, #17 (40)
33. PT 30, S2, #5 (55)
34. PT 31, S2, #22 (94)
35. PT 32, S1, #3 (119)
36. PT 32, S4, #3 (139)
37. PT 32, S4, #18 (143)
38. PT 33, S1, #18 (157)
39. PT 34, S3, #1 (202)
40. PT 35, S1, #7 (222)
41. PT 36, S1, #5 (255) (violated)
42. PT 36, S1, #17 (259) (parallelism)
43. PT 36, S3, #15 (274)
44. PT 37, S2, #18 (300)
45. PT 38, S1, #7 (323)
46. PT 38, S4, #23 (348)
47. PT 43, S3, #3 (28)
48. PT 43, S3, #5 (28) (necessary/sufficient)
49. PT 43, S3, #26 (34)
50. PT 44, S2, #12 (22) (parallelism)
51. PT 44, S2, #17 (23) (numbers/percentages)
52. PT 44, S4, #4 (31)
53. PT 44, S4, #13 (34)
54. PT 45, S1, #9 (13)
55. PT 45, S4, #2 (31) (parallelism)
56. PT 45, S4, #21 (37)
57. PT 46, S2, #3 (18)
58. PT 46, S2, #15 (21)
59. PT 46, S2, #21 (24) (parallelism)
60. PT 46, S3, #8 (27)
61. PT 46, S3, #12 (28) (parallelism)
62. PT 46, S3, #14 (29)
63. PT 47, S1, #5 (10)
64. PT 47, S1, #7 (10)
65. PT 47, S3, #18 (29) (parallelism)
66. PT 47, S3, #22 (31)
67. PT 48, S1, #4 (11)
68. PT 48, S1, #11 (12)
69. PT 48, S4, #6 (31)
70. PT 49, S2, #3 (13)
71. PT 49, S4, #9 (31)
72. PT 50, S2, #23 (25) (parallelism)
73. PT 50, S2, #25 (25)
74. PT 50, S4, #3 (30)
75. PT 50, S4, #20 (35)
76. PT 51, S1, #9 (11)
77. PT 51, S1, #17 (14)
78. PT 51, S3, #5 (26)
79. PT 51, S3, #7 (26)
80. JN 07, S2, #7 (8)
81. JN 07, S2, #24 (13)
82. JN 07, S3, #1 (14)
83. JN 07, S3, #6 (15)
84. JN 07, S3, #14 (18)
85. PT 52, S1, #22 (16)
86. PT 52, S3, #1 (22)
87. PT 52, S3, #11 (25)
88. PT 52, S3, #25 (29)
89. PT 53, S1, #5 (11)
90. PT 53, S1, #17 (14)
91. PT 53, S3, #18 (27)
92. PT 54, S2, #8 (19)
93. PT 54, S2, #18 (22)
94. PT 54, S4, #17 (35)
95. PT 55, S1, #11 (13)
96. PT 55, S1, #16 (14)
97. PT 55, S1, #21 (15)
98. PT 56, S2, #18 (19) (parallelism)
99. PT 56, S3, #23 (28)
100. PT 57, S2, #1 (14)
101. PT 57, S2, #10 (17)
102. PT 57, S3, #14 (25) (violated)
103. PT 57, S3, #16 (26)
104. PT 58, S1, #2 (10)
105. PT 58, S1, #4 (11)
106. PT 58, S1, #21 (16)
107. PT 58, S1, #23 (16)
108. PT 58, S4, #4 (31)
109. PT 58, S4, #16 (34)
110. PT 58, S4, #37 (25)
111. PT 59, S2, #23 (11)
112. PT 59, S3, #6 (15)
113. PT 59, S3, #18 (18)
PT 60, S1, #18
PT 60, S1, #23
PT 60, S3, #18
PT 60, S3, #20
PT 60, S3, #24
PT 61, S2, #2
PT 61, S2, #5
PT 61, S2, #21
PT 61, S4, #1
PT 61, S4, #19
PT 61, S4, #23
PT 62, S2, #1
PT 62, S2, #13
PT 62, S2, #18
PT 62, S2, #23
PT 62, S2, #26
PT 62, S4, #2
PT 62, S4, #15
PT 62, S4, #20
PT 63, S1, #15
PT 63, S1, #18
PT 63, S1, #22
PT 63, S3, #22
PT 63, S3, #23
PT 64, S1, #12
PT 64, S1, #24
PT 64, S3, #2
PT 64, S3, #18
PT 64, S3, #20
PT 65, S1, #6
PT 65, S1, #14
PT 65, S1, #24
PT 65, S4, #5
PT 65, S4, #18
PT 66, S2, #7
PT 66, S2, #9
PT 66, S2, #12
PT 66, S4, #11
PT 66, S4, #14
PT 66, S4, #16
PT 67, S2, #8
PT 67, S2, #15
PT 67, S2, #18
PT 67, S2, #25
PT 67, S4, #7
PT 67, S4, #8
PT 68, S2, #5
PT 68, S2, #16
PT 68, S3, #1
PT 68, S3, #12
PT 69, S1, #6
PT 69, S1, #8
PT 69, S1, #18
PT 69, S4, #6
PT 69, S4, #17
PT 70, S1, #6
PT 70, S1, #14
PT 70, S1, #23
PT 70, S4, #15
PT 71, S1, #19
PT 71, S1, #25
PT 71, S3, #6
PT 71, S3, #9
PT 71, S3, #13
PT 71, S3, #22
PT 72, S2, #1
PT 72, S2, #6
PT 72, S3, #13
PT 72, S3, #17
PT 72, S3, #21
PT 73, S2, #6
PT 73, S4, #2
PT 74, S4, #5
PT 74, S4, #21
PT 75, S1, #2
PT 75, S1, #10
PT 75, S3, #3
PT 76, S2, #6
PT 76, S2, #23
PT 77, S2, #8
PT 77, S2, #16
PT 77, S4, #1
PT 78, S1, #1
PT 78, S1, #18
PT 78, S3, #6
PT 79, S1, #14
PT 79, S1, #19
PT 79, S4, #7
PT 79, S4, #15
PT 80, S1, #4
PT 80, S4, #8
PT 81, S2, #6


EXCEPT
 
1. PT 7, S1, #19 (21) (could be true)
2. PT 9, S2, #17 (62) (could be true) (numbers/percentages)
3. PT 10, S1, #19 (88) (weaken)
4. PT 12, S2, #25 (159) (must be true) (formal logic)
5. PT 13, S2, #25 (197) (must be true)
6. PT 13, S4, #14 (209) (must be true) (formal logic)
7. PT 13, S4, #21 (212) (MSS)
8. PT 14, S2, #2 (224) (which does NOT meet requirements?)

9. PT 14, S2, #5 (225) (resolve the paradox)
10. PT 14, S2, #24 (231) (weaken)
11. PT 18, S2 #5 (327) (method of reasoning)
12. PT 18, S2, #23 (333) (could be true) (necessary/sufficient)
13. PT 18, S4, #23 (348) (weaken)
14. PT 20, S1, #7 (51) (must be true)
15. PT 20, S1, #20 (56) (necessary assumption)
16. PT 20, S4, #5 (71) (strengthen)
17. PT 20, S4, #23 (76) (weaken)
18. PT 20, S4, #26 (77) (resolve the paradox)
19. PT 22, S2, #8 (128) (weaken)
20. PT 22, S2, #19 (131) (necessary assumption)
21. PT 22, S4, #15 (142) (strengthen) (principle)
22. PT 23, S2, #26 (163) (weaken)
23. PT 23, S3, #15 (168) (strengthen)
24. PT 24, S2, #4 (194) (strengthen)
25. PT 24, S2, #7 (195) (weaken)
26. PT 24, S2, #19 (200) (weaken)
27. PT 24, S2, #20 (200) (weaken)
28. PT 24, S3, #14 (205) (resolve the paradox)
29. PT 24, S3, #22 (208) (weaken)
30. PT 25, S4, #11 (243) (weaken)
31. PT 25, S4, #15 (244) (could be true)
32. PT 25, S4, #16 (244) (could be true)
33. PT 26, S2, #19 (263) (must be true)
34. PT 26, S2, #22 (264) (necessary assumption)
35. PT 27, S1 #25 (295) (flaw in the reasoning)
36. PT 27, S4, #16 (312) (strengthen)
37. PT 28, S1, #1 (322) (strengthen)
38. PT 28, S1, #11 (324) (could be true)
39. PT 28, S1, #23 (328) (weaken)
40. PT 28, S3 #4 (334) (supported)
41. PT 28, S3, #12 (336) (each statement conflicts with X’s view)
42. PT 28, S3, #20 (339) (flaw in the reasoning)
43. PT 29, S1, #3 (16) (strengthen)
44. PT 29, S1, #25 (23) (resolve the paradox)
45. PT 29, S4, #19 (41) (resolve the paradox)
46. PT 29, S4, #20 (41) (strengthen)
47. PT 30, S2, #12 (57) (resolve the paradox)
48. PT 30, S1, #19 (59) (principle)
49. PT 30, S4, #5 (71) (resolve the paradox)
50. PT 30, S4, #7 (71) (could be true)
51. PT 31, S2, #8 (90) (could be true)
52. PT 31, S2, #13 (92) (resolve the paradox)
53. PT 31, S3, #12 (99) (weaken)
54. PT 32, S1, #17 (123) (weaken)
55. PT 32, S1, #20 (124) (strengthen)
56. PT 32, S4, #15 (142) (flaw in the reasoning)
57. PT 33, S1, #16 (156) (each consistent with above policy)
58. PT 33, S1, #20 (157) (weaken)
59. PT 33, S1, #22 (158) (flaw in the reasoning)
60. PT 33, S3, #3 (169) (resolve the paradox)
61. PT 34, S3, #2 (202) (resolve the paradox)
62. PT 34, S3, #22 (207) (could be true)
63. PT 35, S1, #10 (222) (resolve the paradox)
64. PT 35, S1, #15 (224) (strengthen)
65. PT 35, S4, #1 (240) (supported)
66. PT 35, S4, #17 (244) (weaken)
67. PT 36, S1, #23 (260) (explains a phenomenon)
68. PT 37, S2, #8 (298) (resolve the paradox)
69. PT 37, S2, #17 (300) (resolve the paradox)
70. PT 37, S2, #20 (301) (strengthen)
71. PT 37, S4, #13 (311) (strengthen)
72. PT 38, S4, #5 (343) (strengthen)
73. PT 38, S4, #7 (343) (principle)
74. PT 38, S4, #9 (344) (resolve the paradox)
75. PT 38, S4, #25 (349) (could be true)
76. PT 43, S2, #8 (21) (strengthen)
77. PT 43, S3, #2 (27) (strengthen)
78. PT 43, S3, #15 (31) (resolve the paradox) (numbers/percentages)
79. PT 43, S3, #17 (32) (could be true)
80. PT 44, S2, #8 (21) (weaken)
81. PT 44, S4, #17 (35) (strengthen)
82. PT 44, S4, #18 (35) (could be true)
83. PT 45, S4, #11 (34) (evaluate the argument)
84. PT 45, S4, #15 (35) (resolve the paradox)
85. PT 47, S3, #11 (27) (resolve the paradox)
86. PT 47, S3, #15 (28) (explains a finding)
87. PT 48, S4, #23 (36) (weaken)
88. PT 49, S2, #4 (14) (strengthen)
89. PT 49, S2, #11 (13) (strengthen)
90. PT 49, S2, #16 (17) (could be true)
91. PT 49, S2, #21 (18) (could be true)
92. PT 49, S4, #4 (30) (strengthen)
93. PT 49, S4, #25 (36) (explain a phenomenon)
94. PT 50, S2, #5 (19) (explains a phenomenon)
95. PT 50, S2, #24 (25) (weaken)
96. JN 07, S2, #19 (11) (strengthen)
97. JN 07, S3, #2 (14) (resolve the paradox)
98. PT 52, S1, #11 (13) (explains a phenomenon)
99. PT 52, S1, #18 (15) (could be true)
100. PT 53, S1, #1 (10) (strengthen)
101. PT 53, S1, #24 (17) (explains a phenomenon)
102. PT 53, S3, #13 (25) (parallel reasoning/flaw)
103. PT 53, S3, #22 (28) (resolve the paradox)
104. PT 55, S1, #25 (17) (must be true)
105. PT 55, S3, #6 (27) (principle)
106. PT 56, S3, #22 (28) (could be true)
107. PT 58, S1, #8 (12) (resolve the paradox)
108. PT 59, S3, #17 (17) (resolve the paradox)

After PT59, Except questions appear in their original question-type category, not separately.



MAIN POINT

1. PT 7, S4, #2 (36)
2. PT 9, S2, #3 (59)
3. PT 9, S4, #18 (74)
4. PT 10, S1, #11 (86)
5. PT 11, S2, #4 (123) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
6. PT 11, S2, #20 (127)
7. PT 11, S4, #8 (140)
8. PT 12, S1, #1 (152)
9. PT 12, S1, #9 (154)
10. PT 12, S4, #10 (175) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
11. PT 13, S4, #3 (206)
12. PT 14, S2, #14 (228) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
13. PT 14, S2, #19 (229)
14. PT 15, S2, #8 (264)
15. PT 15, S2, #11 (265)
16. PT 15, S3, #1 (270)
17. PT 15, S3, #4 (271)
18. PT 16, S3, #19 (305)
19. PT 18, S2, #10 (329)
20. PT 18, S4, #2 (342)
21. PT 19, S2, #17 (25) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
22. PT 21, S2, #1 (88)
23. PT 21, S2, #14 (92)
24. PT 21, S3, #2 (96)
25. PT 21, S3, #10 (98)
26. PT 22 S2, #2 (126)
27. PT 23, S2, #2 (156)
28. PT 23, S3, #21 (169)
29. PT 23, S3, #25 (171)
30. PT 24, S2, #12 (197)
31. PT 24, S2 #15 (198)
32. PT 25, S2, #1 (228)
33. PT 25, S2, #7 (230)
34. PT 25, S4, #1 (240)
35. PT 26, S2, #8 (259)
36. PT 28, S1, #18 (327)
37. PT 28, S3, #14 (337)
38. PT 29, S1, #11 (19)
39. PT 29, S4, #6 (37)
40. PT 30, S2, #23 (60) (structured to lead to which conclusion?) (numbers and percentages)
41. PT 30, S4, #2 (70)
42. PT 31, S2, #4 (89)
43. PT 31, S3, #14 (99)
44. PT 32, S1, #13 (122)
45. PT 32, S4, #12 (141)
46. PT 33, S1, #5 (153)
47. PT 34, S2, #15 (198)
48. PT 34, S2, #18 (199)
49. PT 35, S1, #3 (221)
50. PT 35, S1, #16 (224)
51. PT 35, S1, #9 (242)
52. PT 36, S1, #6 (256)
53. PT 36, S3, #3 (271)
54. PT 36, S3, #9 (272)
55. PT 36, S3, #23 (277) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
56. PT 38, S1, #2 (322)
57. PT 38, S4, #3 (342)
58. PT 38, S4, #11 (344)
59. PT 43, S3, #14 (31) (structured to lead to which conclusion?)
60. PT 43, S3, #23 (33)
61. PT 44, S2, #16 (23)
62. PT 45, S1, #1 (11)
63. PT 45, S1, #17 (15)
64. PT 45, S4, #1 (31)
65. PT 45, S4, #9 (33)
66. PT 46, S3, #5 (27)
67. PT 46, S3, #21 (31)
68. PT 47, S3, #6 (26)
69. PT 48, S1, #5 (11)
70. PT 48, S1, #8 (12)
71. PT 48, S4, #1 (30)
72. PT 48, S4, #12 (33)
73. PT 49, S4, #7 (30)
74. PT 50, S2, #4 (19)
75. PT 50, S2, #20 (24)
76. PT 50, S4, #25 (37)
77. PT 51, S1, #1 (9)
78. PT 51, S1, #13 (12)
79. PT 51, S3, #16 (29)
80. JN 07, S2, #1 (6)
81. JN 07, S2, #10 (8)
82. JN 07, S3, #12 (17)
83. PT 52, S1, #1 (10)
84. PT 52, S3, #2 (22)
85. PT 53, S1, #4 (10)
86. PT 53, S3, #3 (23)
87. PT 53, S3, #5 (23)
88. PT 54, S2, #11 (20)
89. PT 54, S4, #11 (33)
90. PT 55, S1, #18 (14)
91. PT 55, S3, #13 (29)
92. PT 55, S3, #20 (32)
93. PT 56, S3, #5 (23)
94. PT 56, S3, #19 (27)
95. PT 57, S3, #3 (22)
96. PT 58, S1, #13 (13)
97. PT 58, S4, #3 (30)
98. PT 59, S2, #10 (7)
99. PT 59, S3, #9 (15)
PT 60, S1, #8
PT 60, S3, #14
PT 60, S3, #15
PT 61, S2, #9
PT 61, S2, #15
PT 61, S4, #6
PT 61, S4, #16
PT 62, S2, #10
PT 62, S4, #1
PT 62, S4, #12
PT 63, S1, #8
PT 63, S1, #13
PT 63, S3, #10
PT 64, S1, #1
PT 66, S4, #5
PT 65, S1, #2
PT 65, S1, #9
PT 65, S4, #14
PT 66, S2, #18
PT 66, S4, #9
PT 66, S4, #26
PT 68, S2, #17
PT 68, S2, #19
PT 68, S3, #8
PT 68, S3, #11
PT 69, S1, #9
PT 69, S4, #1
PT 69, S4, #24
PT 70, S1, #18
PT 70, S4, #16
PT 71, S1, #5
PT 71, S1, #7
PT 71, S3, #12
PT 72, S2, #4
PT 72, S3, #3
PT 72, S3, #9
PT 73, S2, #11
PT 73, S4, #5
PT 73, S4, #11
PT 74, S1, #13
PT 74, S4, #2
PT 75, S1, #8
PT 75, S3, #8
PT 77, S2, #11
PT 77, S4, #8
PT 78, S3, #18
PT 79, S1, #9
PT 79, S4, #11
PT 79, S4, #17
PT 80, S1, #3
PT 80, S1, #6
PT 80, S4, #9
PT 81, S2, #14
PT 81, S3, #8


POINT AT ISSUE
1. PT 10, S4, #7 (106)
2. PT 11, S4, #2 (138)
3. PT 13, S2, #11 (193)
4. PT 13, S4, #7 (207)
5. PT 14, S4, #11 (243)
6. PT 16, S2, #13 (295)
7. PT 16, S3, #4 (301)
8. PT 19, S2, #16 (24)
9. PT 19, S4, #16 (40)
10. PT 20, S1, #13 (53)
11. PT 20, S4, #21 (76)
12. PT 22, S4, #3 (139)
13. PT 22, S4, #10 (140)
14. PT 24, S2, #14 (198)
15. PT 24, S3, #1 (202)
16. PT 25, S4, #22 (246)
17. PT 26, S2, #3 (258)
18. PT 26, S2, #24 (265)
19. PT 27, S1, #1 (288)
20. PT 27, S4, #11 (311)
21. PT 28, S1, #6 (323)
22. PT 29, S1, #1 (16)
23. PT 29, S1, #9 (18)
24. PT 29, S4, #13 (39)
25. PT 29, S4, #16 (40)
26. PT 30, S2, #10 (56) (numbers/percentages)
27. PT 30, S4, #21 (76)
28. PT 31, S2, #1 (88)
29. PT 31, S3, #3 (96) (most strongly supported)
30. PT 31, S3, #19 (101)
31. PT 32, S4, #20 (143)
32. PT 33, S1, #3 (153)
33. PT 33, S3, #19 (173)
34. PT 34, S3, #7 (204)
35. PT 34, S3, #15 (206)
36. PT 35, S1, #26 (227)
37. PT 36, S3, #4 (271)
38. PT 37, S2, #11 (298)
39. PT 37, S2, #23 (302)
40. PT 37, S4, #7 (309)
41. PT 38, S1, #5 (323)
42. PT 38, S4, #26 (349)
43. PT 43, S2, #1 (19)
44. PT 43, S2, #13 (22)
45. PT 43, S2, #19 (24)
46. PT 43, S3, #6 (28)
47. PT 44, S2, #6 (20)
48. PT 44, S4, #10 (33)
49. PT 45, S1, #6 (12)
50. PT 45, S1, #10 (14)
51. PT 45, S4, #8 (33)
52. PT 46, S2, #1 (18)
53. PT 46, S2, #9 (20)
54. PT 47, S1, #4 (10)
55. PT 47, S1, #25 (16)
56. PT 47, S3, #5 (26)
57. PT 47, S3, #9 (27)
58. PT 49, S2, #1 (13)
59. PT 49, S2, #10 (15)
60. PT 50, S2, #11 (21)
61. PT 50, S4, #8 (31)
62. PT 51, S4, #23 (15)
63. JN 07, S2, #16 (11)
64. JN 07, S3, #3 (14)
65. JN 07, S3, #7 (15)
66. PT 52, S3, #10 (24)
67. PT 53, S1, #2 (10)
68. PT 56, S2, #2 (14)
69. PT 56, S2, #17 (18)
70. PT 56, S2, #21 (20)
71. PT 57, S2, #11 (17)
72. PT 59, S2, #2 (5)
PT 60, S3, #25
PT 61, S2, #7
PT 61, S4, #18
PT 63, S1, #14
PT 63, S3, #4
PT 64, S3, #5
PT 64, S3, #7
PT 65, S1, #23
PT 65, S4, #4
PT 65, S4, #25
PT 66, S2, #20
PT 66, S4, #19
PT 66, S4, #23
PT 67, S2, #10
PT 67, S2, #16
PT 68, S2, #21
PT 68, S3, #25
PT 70, S1, #4
PT 71, S1, #10
PT 71, S3, #2
PT 72, S2, #19
PT 76, S2, #3
PT 76, S4, #4
PT 76, S4, #10
PT 77, S4, #2
PT 78, S1, #4
PT 78, S1, #6
PT 78, S1, #20
PT 79, S1, #11
PT 79, S4, #5
PT 79, S4, #20
PT 80, S1, #7
PT 80, S1, #15
PT 80, S1, #18
PT 80, S4, #2
PT 81, S2, #26
PT 81, S3, #1


ARGUMENT PART/ROLE OF A STATEMENT

1. PT 7, S1, #18 (21)
2. PT 9, S2, #20 (63)
3. PT 9, S4, #20 (75)
4. PT 10, S4, #13 (108)
5. PT 11, S4, #24 (145)
6. PT 12, S1, #3 (152)
7. PT 14, S2, #9 (226)
8. PT 15, S2, #14 (266)
9. PT 15, S3, #11 (272)
10. PT 19, S4, #17 (40)
11. PT 20, S4, #9 (72)
12. PT 23, S2, #11 (158)
13. PT 24, S2, #10 (196)
14. PT 26, S3, #4 (267)

15. PT 27, S1, #14 (292)
16. PT 27, S1, #17 (293)
17. PT 27, S4, #24 (315)
18. PT 29, S4, #2 (36)
19. PT 29, S4, #15 (40)
20. PT 30, S4, #3 (70)
21. PT 30, S4, #13 (73)
22. PT 31, S2, #12 (91)
23. PT 31, S3, #16 (100)
24. PT 32, S1, #15 (122)
25. PT 32, S4, #23 (145)
26. PT 33, S3, #14 (171)
27. PT 34, S2, #22 (200)
28. PT 34, S3, #14 (205)
29. PT 34, S3, #26 (209)
30. PT 35, S1, #1 (220)
31. PT 35, S1, #9 (222)
32. PT 35, S4, #2 (240)
33. PT 35, S4, #15 (244)
34. PT 36, S3, #6 (271)
35. PT 38, S1, #18 (327)
36. PT 38, S4, #18 (346)
37. PT 43, S2, #2 (19)
38. PT 43, S2, #23 (25)
39. PT 44, S2, #19 (24)
40. PT 44, S2, #24 (26)
41. PT 44, S4, #6 (32)
42. PT 44, S4, #24 (37)
43. PT 45, S4, #23 (37)
44. PT 46, S3, #16 (29)
45. PT 46, S3, #18 (30)
46. PT 48, S4, #5 (31)
47. PT 49, S2, #12 (16)
48. PT 50, S2, #15 (22)
49. PT 50, S2, #19 (23)
50. PT 50, S4, #6 (31)
51. PT 51, S1, #14 (13)
52. PT 51, S3, #23 (31)
53. JN 07, S2, #11 (9)
54. PT 52, S3, #17 (26)
55. PT 53, S1, #11 (12)
56. PT 53, S1, #14 (13)
57. PT 53, S3, #20 (25)
58. PT 54, S2, #17 (22)
59. PT 54, S4, #15 (34)
60. PT 55, S1, #19 (15)
61. PT 55, S3, #7 (27)
62. PT 56, S2, #25 (21)
63. PT 57, S2, #13 (17)
64. PT 57, S2, #16 (18)
65. PT 57, S2, #21 (20)
66. PT 57, S3, #21 (28)
67. PT 59, S2, #7 (7)
68. PT 59, S2, #18 (9)
PT 60, S1, #4
PT 60, S3, #5
PT 60, S3, #7
PT 61, S2, #17
PT 61, S4, #17
PT 61, S4, #22
PT 62, S4, #4
PT 63, S3, #1
PT 64, S1, #14
PT 64, S1, #25
PT 64, S3, #10
PT 64, S3, #16
PT 65, S1, #10
PT 65, S1, #22
PT 65, S4, #12
PT 65, S4, #21
PT 67, S2, #20
PT 67, S2, #22
PT 67, S4, #22
PT 68, S2, #11
PT 68, S2, #22
PT 69, S1, #11
PT 69, S4, #12
PT 70, S1, #17
PT 70, S4, #24
PT 70, S1, #11
PT 72, S2, #13
PT 72, S3, #15
PT 73, S4, #9
PT 74, S1, #14
PT 75, S1, #14
PT 75, S1, #16
PT 75, S3, #20
PT 76, S4, #7
PT 77, S4, #7
PT 77, S4, #14
PT 77, S4, #16
PT 77, S4, #22
PT 78, S3, #4
PT 78, S3, #14
PT 78, S3, #17
PT 78, S3, #19
PT 79, S1, #22
PT 79, S4, #24
PT 81, S2, #18
PT 81, S3, #17


FILL IN THE BLANK

1. PT 7, S1, #5 (17)
2. PT 7, S4, #18 (41)
3. PT 10, S4, #24 (111)
4. PT 13, S2, #9 (192)
5. PT 15, S3, #21 (275)
6. PT 18, S2, #18 (331)
7. PT 18, S4, #4 (343)
8. PT 19, S2, #19 (25)
9. PT 20, S4, #13 (73)
10. PT 25, S2, #3 (229)
11. PT 26, S3, #7 (267)
12. PT 34, S3, #12 (205)
13. PT 37, S2, #9 (298)
14. PT 37, S4, #1 (308)
15. PT 37, S4, #8 (310)
16. PT 38, S1, #19 (327)
17. PT 38, S4, #10 (344)
18. PT 44, S4, #8 (32)
19. PT 44, S4, #23 (37)
20. PT 47, S1, #13 (12)
21. PT 47, S3, #12 (28)
22. PT 48, S1, #6 (11)
23. JN 07, S2, #3 (7)
24. JN 07, S2, #8 (8)
25. JN 07, S3, #10 (16)
26. JN 07, S3, #16 (18)
27. PT 52, S1, #13 (13)
28. PT 53, S3, #7 (24)
29. PT 54, S2, #7 (19)
30. PT 55, S1, #3 (26) (strengthen)
31. PT 57, S2, #2 (14)
32. PT 57, S2, #18 (19)
33. PT 59, S2, #12 (8)
34. PT 59, S2, #24 (11)


EVALUATE THE ARGUMENT

1. PT 7, S1, #22 (22)
2. PT 7, S4, #8 (38)
3. PT 9, S4, #8 (71) (least important)
4. PT 10, S1, #6 (85)
5. PT 11, S2, #2 (122)
6. PT 13, S2, #22 (196)
7. PT 15, S2, #22 (268)
8. PT 15, S3, #16 (274)
9. PT 19, S4, #22 (42)
10. PT 20, S4, #7 (71)
11. PT 21, S3, #11 (98)
12. PT 24, S2, #16 (198)
13. PT 27, S4, #6 (309)
14. PT 28, S3, #13 (337) (which would resolve dispute in favor of one party to it?)
15. PT 36, S1, #24 (260)
16. PT 38, S4, #19 (346)
17. PT 46, S3, #3 (26)
18. PT 49, S4, #2 (29)
19. PT 51, S1, #2 (9)
PT 61, S4, #2
PT 65, S1, #3
PT 65, S4, #7
PT 68, S2, #2
PT 68, S2, #14
PT 69, S1, #5
PT 70, S1, #11

CANNOT BE TRUE/MOST WEAKENED
1. PT 7, S4, #12 (39)
2. PT 19, S4, #13 (39)
3. PT 25, S4, #26 (247)
4. PT 26, S3, #12 (269)
5. PT 28, S1, #20 (327)
6. PT 29, S4, #22 (42)
7. PT 31, S2, #15 (92)
8. PT 48, S4, #18 (34)
9. PT 49, S4, #5 (30) (formal logic)
10. PT 57, S2, #23 (21)


INTERPRETS TO MEAN
1. PT 7, S1, #3 (16)
2. PT 18, S2, #14 (330)
3. PT 28, S1, #25 (329)
4. PT 31, S3, #15 (99)
5. PT 32, S4, #25 (145)
6. PT 33, S3, #2 (168)
7. PT 43, S2, #5 (20)


LOGICAL FORCE
1. PT 12, S1, #26 (159)
2. PT 12, S4, #24 (179)
3. PT 19, S4, #5 (37)


OTHER
1. PT 27, S4, #22 (314) (verbal substitution)

The Dinosaur Game and Whether to Cancel Your LSAT Score

LSAT Dinosaur Logic GameFirst of all, congratulations to everyone who took the LSAT on Monday - you made it!

For the most part, it sounds like most of you did well. However, some of you had difficulty with one Logic Game in particular - the "dinosaur game." After the exam, many of you emailed me to ask my advice about whether or not you should cancel.

This post is primarily for June 2009 test-takers, but it'll apply to anyone who takes the LSAT and is stressed about a particular question.

Anyone who didn't take the June 2009 LSAT probably thinks the dinosaur on the right looks cute and cuddly. I understand your skepticism.

However, you'll know why many June test-takers were intimidated by the dinosaur game when you finally look at PrepTest 57 (June 2009 LSAT).

LSAC has rules prohibiting the discussion of LSAT questions prior to their publication. As such, I won't post any specifics about it for the next few weeks.

Until then, here are some tips for June test-takers about the decision of whether or not to cancel their scores.

Reasons to cancel your LSAT score:
If the dinosaur game threw you off for the rest of the exam, I would cancel the score to avoid blemishes.

It looks better to have a cancellation and a high score than to have a low score and a high score.

Cancellations are ambiguous. Low scores aren't.

You don't need a low score on your record to motivate yourself. You can motivate yourself with the goal of getting into the law schools you want.

It's much better to cancel than to let a low score remain on your record.

Many students canceled or were absent simply because of the early postponement deadline. If you cancel, you'll be part of the "silver lining" group I described. Enjoy.


Reasons not to cancel your LSAT score:
Most test-takers didn't like the "dinosaur game." If that game was the only thing that gave you an unusual degree of difficulty, and everything else went as usual (or better), I wouldn't cancel the score.

Keep in mind that most LSAT-takers are in your shoes. It all comes down to how LSAC makes the curve. I wouldn't be surprised if the curve (LSAC prefers to call it a "test-equating process" since the LSAT is not technically curved) were more generous than usual in order to account for the fact that so many test-takers found the dinosaur game difficult.

***
You have 6 calendar days from the exam date to cancel.

For advice on retaking the LSAT, please see Should You Retake the LSAT? and How to Study for a Retake.

If you're concerned about running out of material, please see How Many (Free) LSAT PrepTests Are There? for some exams you may have missed.

Law School Admission Game | Interview

LSAT Blog Law School Admission Game BookLaw school admission consultant Ann Levine just came out with The Law School Admission Game. I recently interviewed Ann about her new book. Our discussion follows.

1. You have special tips for students applying to law schools that are far away from where they currently live. You suggest that they give specific reasons why they would want to move across the country for law school, such as family members or a fiancé.

I agree that it's important to convince each school of one's seriousness about attending if accepted. How can students work these details into their essays while maintaining the essay's flow?

Sometimes it’s easy to express sincere interest in a school within a personal statement. For example, it can be persuasive when showing an applicant is drawn to a certain area of law (hard to study maritime law in Iowa, for example) or wanting to continue volunteer work with respect to gay rights and what better way to be on the forefront of the political war in California than to be in San Francisco during law school, etc. Reasons for attending a certain school (or being in a certain location) actually fit in nicely with many personal statement topics, but I do understand it can be hard to avoid the seemingly inevitable “Why X Law School” concluding paragraph. Other options would be including this information in an addendum or in a separate letter to the law school. For example, it can be worked in with an addendum explaining inconsistent undergraduate grades. “I learned that I perform better academically when surrounded by a support system. My brother and his wife live in Boston and I would save money during law school by living with them. As a result, I would not have to work during law school as I did during college and my grades would therefore not be hampered by my financial obligations.” The important thing is that the reason be sincere and persuasive, rather than a platitude. Telling a law school “New York is the hub of the financial world and an exciting city” is a waste of space and not going to get you anywhere.


2. You write that students can increase the number and amount of scholarship offers by telling one law school about a competing school's scholarship offer. What are some ways to increase financial aid without an initial scholarship in the first place?

First, I want to clarify the difference between “scholarship” and “financial aid.” Financial aid includes loans. If an admitted student does not have any scholarship offers, she could still mention another school would be cheaper to attend because she could live at home or because it’s a public school. There are also private scholarship sources (not restricted to a particular school) for resourceful students.


3. In your book, you mention that you're often viewed as the champion of applicants shooting for 4th-tier "regional law schools." When I interviewed admission consultant Anna Ivey, she suggested these law schools aren't worth the investment of time and money. How would you respond?

Oh, I have responded to Anna’s opinions on this subject! I have a lot of respect for Anna but this is one point on which we agree to disagree. I stand by my response (originally posted in September 2007 on my blog).

If someone is going to law school for the sole purpose of going to BigLaw, then Anna’s theory carries quite a bit of weight in normal economic circumstances. However, in today’s world, BigLaw is no longer a security blanket with a promise of $160k right out of school. These firms are turning away people they’ve hired and firing associates! It could actually be argued that the economic impact of the current recession will be worse on law students at Top-14 schools because many of them were depending on these high paying jobs and may be unwilling to consider (or might appear overqualified for) jobs that graduates of lower ranked schools might accept.

Putting that aside, I stand by the following: the value of a legal education directly relates to the effort a law student puts in – not just to grades and law review, but to networking and marketing. I interviewed Kevin Houchin, Esq., author of “Fuel the Spark: 5 Guiding Values for Success in Law School and Beyond” on BlogTalkRadio.com. We spent a lot of time talking about the “Other 90%” – those not planning to go to BigLaw – and how they can build careers while still in law school. There are so many examples of people who succeed in life and in law without a “brand name” law school – I would never say to someone that only a certain kind of legal education is worthwhile. The key is to be smart about the debt you’re taking on and having reasonable salary expectations. It’s very possible to build connections and a brand for yourself while still a law student. Finding a job/career might take a little more creativity now that BigLaw jobs are drying up; self-motivated students face no limits on what they might earn after law school.


4. At 168 pages, your book is shorter than many other law school admission books. For example, I've reviewed How to Get Into the Top Law Schools by Richard Montauk, which is over 600 pages. What do you think are some of the advantages that applicants gain from a more concise book?

Brevity is underrated! I love to take a client’s 4 page personal statement and turn it into one that’s 500 words –and it’s usually stronger as a result. I actually say in my book, “Cutting a personal statement to size shouldn’t mean sacrificing content; it should require you to really think about your message and what is essential to include for you to prove that message.” I think the same applies to law school admission guidebooks.

It should be noted that I include no sample personal statements in my book – they are great page fillers, but I don’t believe in giving people personal statement examples. I want each personal statement to be unique, and so many law school admission books include really trite and unimpressive personal statements. Instead, I share an entire chapter of specific “do’s and don’ts” regarding personal statements. I also include four “Case Studies” of applicant profiles and suggestions of how each could use the personal statement as an opportunity to highlight a particular strength or overcome a weakness or concern a law school admission officer might have based on his background. Instead of showing people essays that don’t apply to their lives, such as the “I overcame a brain injury” and “I spent all day talking to Homeless Mary at the shelter” I wanted to show the backgrounds of four potential applicants that almost everyone can relate to and provide several ideas for effective personal statement topics in each case.

For example, here’s the first case study in the book (from page 93):

I am three years out of college and I’ve held a few jobs. I worked as a mortgage broker’s assistant, then as a publishing assistant, then sold classified ads for an online magazine. What do I write my personal statement about?
For those of you a few years out of college who have held 2-3 jobs that weren’t promotions within the same company or industry, then applying to law school can appear insincere. It can look like you’re floundering and still trying to find yourself. When objectively analyzing your resume, consider the impact of this trend and consider ways to overcome it, perhaps by emphasizing a volunteer position or thinking about ways the jobs actually have more in common with each other than meets the eye, or considering how each ob has actually allowed you to come closer to the conclusion that law school is the right next step for you. You might also consider this theme by sharing a story from your personal life about the impact a lawyer had on your family’s situation, even if the impact was negative.

In your review of Mr. Montauk’s book, you actually said much of it would only apply to applicants seeking admission to a Top-10 school. My book is concise but the advice within it is intended to apply to all law school applicants, no matter their aspirations. It’s about how to best present yourself – whoever YOU are – and you don’t present different versions of yourself to different schools based on that school’s ranking. Besides, one person’s reach school might be Columbia, but another person’s reach school might be CUNY – both applicants benefit from the advice in my book.

About the LSAT PDF by LSAC

LSAT Blog About LSAC PDFThis PDF is no longer available and has been replaced by LSAC's About the LSAT Video.

While digging through the Law School Admission Council's (LSAC) website the other day, I discovered a great overview of the LSAT.

It's called, appropriately enough, "About the LSAT" (PDF). It was originally given as a PowerPoint presentation by Lily Knezevich, a Senior Test Developer at LSAC.

Luckily for us, LSAC was kind enough to make it available for download as a PDF for anyone who couldn't make it.

A few quick notes on the LSAT questions used in the PDF:

The jury trial passage (on page 9 of the PDF) is from PrepTest 37 (June 2002), Section 1.

The Comparative Reading passages (on page 12 of the PDF) are from LSAC's "Preparing for the LSAT" PDF. They're not from any PrepTest.

The Logical Reasoning question (on page 19 of the PDF) is PrepTest 22 (June 1997), Section 4, Question 5.

The partial Logic Game (on page 24 of the PDF) is not from any PrepTest or document I've ever seen.

This PDF was a presentation given at an LSAC Law School Forum in October 2007, so it doesn't reference any of the PrepTests after PrepTest 51 (December 2006). I've listed all the PrepTests you'll need in the Best LSAT Prep Books post.

Photo by 11654579@N07

How to Cancel Your LSAT Score

LSAT Blog How Cancel Your ScoreIf you intend to cancel your LSAT score or to be absent, please my post on canceling or being absent.

After your test, please submit your LSAT test center reviews to help future test-takers.

***
This post includes excerpts from LSAC's website explaining how to cancel your LSAT score. It also includes info from LSAC about how score cancellations and absences appear on your score report. Here the LSAT score cancellation form (PDF).

Canceling Your LSAT Score
LSAC says:

We must receive a signed fax or overnight letter with your request within six calendar days of the test. If you do not receive confirmation of receipt of your request within four calendar days after your request was submitted, contact LSAC immediately. If your request has not been processed, you may submit proof that your request was received at LSAC within the required period. Documentation of proof of receipt will not be accepted beyond 14 calendar days after the test. You can also cancel your score at the test center if you are absolutely certain you want to cancel your score.


How Cancellations and Absences Appear on Your Score Report

Both score cancellations and absences do appear on your LSAC score report. This means they're reported to law schools.

LSAC says:
The score report that is displayed online or mailed to you will show your current test results, along with the results of all tests—up to 12—...including absences and cancellations. An average score is also calculated and reported when you have more than one reportable score.
However, test date postponements and registration cancellations made by LSAC's deadline (3 weeks before the exam date) do not appear on score reports.

Photo by mag3737


5 Hardest LSAT Reading Comprehension Passages

LSAT Blog Hardest Reading Comprehension PassagesI've already listed the 10 Hardest Logic Games, but a list of the 5 Hardest Reading Comprehension Passages is long overdue.

This list is focused on exams published 2000-2010. (See the list of every LSAT PrepTest.)

These make for great bathroom/beach reading. Enjoy!

***

1. PrepTest 35 (October 2001), Passage 4 - Ronald Dworkin and Legal Positivism vs. Moralism (p234 in Next 10)

2. PrepTest 49 (June 2006), Passage 4 - Maize

3. PrepTest 50 (October 2006), Passage 4 - Riddled Basins of Attraction

4. PrepTest 55 (October 2008), Passage 3 - Maxine Kingston and the Chinese talk-story

5. PrepTest 59 (December 2009), Passage 3 - Isamu Noguchi and Sculpture

Also, here are some Difficult LSAT Logical Reasoning Questions.

Photo by dalvenjah

How to Challenge a Flawed or Unfair LSAT Question

LSAT Blog Challenge Flawed Unfair QuestionEven the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) makes mistakes.

Occasionally, a flawed LSAT question (a question that has no clearly correct answer) slips through the cracks and makes it onto a scored section of an actual administered LSAT exam.

Fortunately, like any bureaucracy worth its salt, LSAC has a set of rules in place just in case a clever (or stubborn) test-taker decides that his/her logic surpasses LSAC's. You can find these rules in "Policies and Procedures Governing Challenges to Law School Admission Test Questions."

Blog reader Jamie recently emailed me about "withdrawn" LSAT questions (questions that students have successfully challenged). Because LSAC doesn't want to confuse students with ambiguous or poorly-written questions in the published versions of its exams (and because it doesn't want its mistakes to live on in published form), these questions are not reprinted. Instead, the space where they appear is simply noted as "withdrawn."

Jamie writes:
I sometimes come across a "withdrawn" question on a released test: you know, "withdrawn from scoring." I imagine a number of different situations: LSAC scores the exams and realizes that a certain question threw off the difficulty of the test, or two angry LSAC philosophers break into arm wrestling match over a question only to realize there are multiple acceptable solutions as presented, or perhaps a heroic test candidate catches a flaw the LSAC glossed over, reports it to Newtown (Ed: the town in Pennsylvania where LSAC's headquarters are located - Steve), gets a 181 and a ticker-tape parade.

Whatever the cause, what are the implications? If LSAC withdraws a question, and your answer was the credited answer, do you lose out on a point? If you're certain that a test question has an error, do you have a recourse? I just wonder if it's detrimental to note "withdrawn" on the released test, since the released version is no longer an accurate specimen of what you would have sat through for that particular test.
LSAC calculates the scale (translation of raw scores to scores out of 180) before each administration, and it pre-tests questions in previous exams' experimental sections. For this reason, it's not due to the exam's difficulty. (LSAC occasionally recalibrates the scale if an exam turns out to be harder or easier than expected. However, it doesn't withdraw questions for this reason.)

It's also not the philosophers' arm-wrestling match, as amusing as that would be. LSAC philosophers do all their arm-wrestling before the exam is ever administered.

Withdrawn questions only result from the efforts of heroic flaw-catching test candidates.

Yes, if they withdraw a question, but you answered it "correctly," you lose out on the point.

If you're certain that a question is wrong, you can email LSAC afterwards. If they decide in your favor, they'll withdraw the question.

However, under test day pressure, it's better to attempt every question than to puzzle over one you believe to be poorly-written. While you'd live on in the test-takers' hall of fame for your efforts, it's to your advantage to prioritize the other questions instead of getting bogged-down.

If you take a practice exam that contains a withdrawn question, your experience won't be perfectly similar to that of the people who actually took that test, but it'll be pretty darn close, just one fewer question out of approximately 100 questions. It's negligible in the larger scheme of things.

LSAC recalibrates the scale when this happens, so you'll still get an accurate result.

***
Read on for Withdrawn LSAT Questions | Item Removed From Scoring.

Photo by andycarvin