Law School Diary: The 80-Something Law Student

LSAT Blog Law School Diary Law StudentIn this Law School Diary, Jeremy gives us an excerpt from his memoir celebrating his mother, Jeanette.

Jeanette graduated from law school at the age of 83, impressed her professors and fellow students, and demonstrated that you're never too old to go to law school.


Jeanette's Law School Diary (as written by Jeremy):

When the Honorable Elijah Huling, Jr. first saw the 82-year-old woman walking into his medical malpractice class at Syracuse University, he thought she was a parent. It never crossed the judge’s mind that Jeanette Goldstein might be one of his students.

But she was.

“I was shocked,” the visiting law professor said.

Judge Huling’s next reaction was that Jeanette must be a part-time student at the College of Law.

But she wasn’t.

And so Judge Huling chuckled, recalling that first introduction in an interview at school. “Amazing,” he said. In fact, the Baldwinsville, N.Y., judge says Jeanette Goldstein was one of the most remarkable students he has ever had as a visiting professor at Syracuse University’s College of Law. She was, in fact, so remarkable that Judge Huling went home to have a heart-to-heart talk with his children after he met her. His children spent about a half hour per week-night on their homework, and Judge Huling scolded them.

You’d better spend a little more time on your studies because I have an 80-year-old student who’s working a lot harder than you!

Jeanette really did work hard.

Her determined motto: Be prepared.

Judge Huling, like all Jeanette’s Syracuse law professors, said Jeanette was always prepared for class. She studied hard for one of Judge Huling’s exams and refused to sign a petition against him after classmates decided the test was unfairly difficult.

Jeanette just stared at the grade next to her assigned student number after grades were posted. She had cataracts and thought she was reading the grade wrong. That couldn’t be a B next to her name, could it?

Jeanette asked Judge Huling to check the grade. “Is that mine?” she asked.

Yes, it was. Jeanette had scored one of the highest grades on an exam that most of her classmates thought had been one of the most difficult of their law school careers. Other students would be pleased just to pass, but Jeanette wanted a good grade.

“I’m amazed,” said Judge Huling, smiling during his interview. “The competition is intense and cut-throat here, and she’s sticking herself right in that competition. She is in the pool, swimming with all the rest of the sharks. It takes courage to do that. I know the environment, and to step out of a familiar environment takes a lot of courage. Courage and fortitude. She just gets in there and plugs away.”

Judge Huling didn’t know that going to law school had been my mother’s dream.

As long as I can remember, my mother wanted to be a lawyer. In fact, she has had this desire since 1955 when she flew to Japan with my father, David Goldstein, on a business trip. My father’s company made movie camera lenses, and my father was always looking for new optical products to sell. In 1955, my father signed a contract with Olympus Corporation of Japan to be the exclusive U.S. importer of their microscopes. My mother enjoyed sitting in on the contract negotiations. In fact, she came to feel she could do a better job than the lawyers.

Could she be a lawyer? My mother had five young children at the time and lived in Rochester, N.Y. She had someone to help her with the children, but still… where could she even go to law school? Rochester didn’t have one.

Forty-one years later, my father died and my mother was grief-stricken. Like so many widows, she’d lost the man she’d loved for over 50 years and didn’t know what to do with herself. Then she thought of her old dream, becoming a lawyer. “Better late than never,” she said.

But, what would we – her children – think? There were eight of us now, all of us grown adults. “I didn’t consider other people’s reactions so much as considering my children’s reactions,” my mother said. “And what surprised me is that even though I was convinced everyone would think I was crazy, they all supported me and thought it was a great idea!”


Here comes the student.

My mother got up the nerve to take the LSAT and apply to two law schools – Nova Southeastern University in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and Syracuse. To her surprise, both schools accepted her! My mother chose Syracuse because of its convenience – a little over an hour away from where she lived in Rochester.

Margery Connor, a former associate dean for student affairs at the College of Law who retired while my mother was a third-year student there, said that the school accepted her because her LSAT scores and her graduate school grades were good. “I looked at her resume,” Ms. Connor said. “Her numbers were enough to let her in.”

The school couldn’t discriminate against Jeanette because of her age. Besides, Ms. Connor said, “I really advocate for the non-traditional student.”

Ms. Connor knew that Jeanette’s age might actually benefit both students and faculty. “She had a point of view that she could share with people,” Ms. Connor said. It would come from her age.

“She is most special because she has had not only life experiences but she’s had business experiences too,” said Professor Frederick J. Micale, an adjunct professor. “She brings that to class and makes a real contribution. I think it’s not only something I appreciate, but other students do, too.”

Professor Micale said students respect the courage of someone Jeanette’s age to undertake the rigors of law. Syracuse had students from all over the world, and some had language and cultural barriers.

In Jeanette’s case, the barriers were physical, Professor Micale pointed out. Jeanette’s eyes and ears were starting to fail. She sat attentively in the front row of the lecture hall because she couldn’t see the board or screen if she sat any farther back. On the negative side, while sitting in front she couldn’t hear the students in the rear.

Administrators wondered if she had the stamina to stick it out.

“She drew a lot of attention and people had doubts,” Ms. Connor said. “Law school is rigorous. You don’t get a lot of rest. I was worried about her capacity to do it all.”

Ms. Connor suggested that Jeanette enroll part-time.

Jeanette refused.

So, in the fall of 2000, Jeanette sat down beside students in their 20’s and started scribbling away on that legal pad. She was the mother of eight children and the grandmother of 22. That was about the age of most of her classmates, too. There were a few doctors, engineers or social workers in their 50’s, and a retired nun had once taken courses at the law school. But Jeanette was the oldest. And, while most of the younger students clicked away on their laptops in class, Jeanette took notes in script. She couldn’t type or use a computer.

Students set their water bottles down and sat next to her, amazed at her initiative. “Everybody was talking about this 80-year-old,” said Jason Cleckner, a 23-year-old classmate who sat next to Jeanette in Civil Procedures class.

“Was there really a president named Ronald Reagan?”

Professors were dumbfounded that they actually had a student in class who had lived through Watergate or the Reagan and Carter eras, ancient events and presidents to these students who were born years after. Jeanette could nod her head when professors spoke of the Great Depression, too. She had lived through it.

“I can make a lot of references to something that happened quite a while ago,” said Professor Christian C. Day.

Whatever grades she earned in any of her classes were hers. Professors did not help her out. That’s because each student was assigned a number, and the number was all the professors ever saw on exams or papers – without ever knowing whose it was. Although Jeanette couldn’t type exams on a computer in class, the school assigned her a typist who sat beside her. Thus, all her work was evaluated without her professors ever knowing that it was hers.

The instructors, moreover, graded on a bell curve. Very few students received As, and a few did receive Ds and Fs. My mother passed all her courses and survived, while a small percentage of students were not performing up to expectation and were asked to leave.

To be honest, it wasn’t easy for my mother that first year either. She had a master’s degree in social work. But, she said, “social work was a breeze in comparison to law school.”

Maybe it was because my mother had been out of school for so many years. “The students coming directly out of college, they knew the shortcuts,” my mother said. “They knew aspects to get through the course much easier than I did.”

Nevertheless, she persevered that first year, even pulling all-nighters when she needed to.

Ms. Connor admitted that my mother had a rocky time. “The first year is the hardest. But she managed to get through it.”

After that first year, my mother started recommending classes to the students who were a year or two behind her.

“She was right on target, too,” said Chanel Hudson, 24, of San Francisco.

As the semesters passed and graduation neared, my mother’s confidence and physical strength grew. Each day, she was forced to take a brisk walk. She’d walk from her graduate student dormitory to the bus stop, and from the bus to the law school. Then, there was the return trip at night. The wind was often blowing and it seemed to snow for days in Syracuse. The winters were cruelly gray and cold. My mother fell on the ice one day during her third year and broke her wrist.

She got a cast, and kept right on wheeling her black book bag to class.


An enrichment for all

She was an inspiration to countless professors, counselors and students. She enriched the school demonstrating that someone her age can handle such a rigorous commitment.

Remember those administrators who had doubts that she could make it full-time? “She proved them all wrong,” Ms. Connor said.

My mother did not hesitate to speak up in class. Based on her experiences with my father’s company, she can discuss distributorships in her international relations class, and then wheel her black book bag to the next lecture hall to share what she knows about negotiations.

“I admired her viewpoint,” said Professor Day.

“She has a good background of life’s experiences that I don’t have,” said Judge Huling.

“She brought the life experiences you couldn’t get from a textbook, the stuff of real law,” said Professor Micale.

In fact, though Professor Micale has thirty years of international law experience, “She knows more than I do,” he said. “When your mother speaks, she becomes the teacher and I become the student.”

He said he felt privileged to have had her in his class. “It’s just an absolute special treat to me because – and I think the best way I can sum it up is – I can truly become a student in my own class by listening to her, and that is the ultimate.”

My mother used to complain that her back bothered her. Luckily, any physical problems my mother had when entering law school began to disappear. In fact, my mother didn’t have time to think about her physical ailments. Her back problem miraculously disappeared. So did some of her concerns about the future. “You don’t think about getting old or dying while you are busy everyday,” my mother said.

Being around young people energized my mother, and her outlook on life brightened. She began to realize that it wasn’t healthy for older people to move into retirement homes with other elderly people. It was far better to be around a mix of people who still spoke about joyful things and didn’t complain about physical ailments all day.

The benefits ran both ways, too. Not only did my mother feel better about herself, succeeding in younger camp, but those younger students profited from her shared experiences. Her comments about what she had learned from my father’s international business experiences piqued their curiosity, Professor Micale said, and “the questions seemed to roll from that point.”

Ms. Connor said she “said so many prayers” that my mother would make it through school. But, she added, “her success was based on her determination and conscientiousness. She really worked at it.”


The Graduate!

Ms. Connor read my mother’s name at the graduation ceremony on May 15th when she graduated at 83. “It enriched my life,” said Ms. Connor of the experience. “My hat’s off to her.”

Professor Micale said he hoped that he had as much vitality as my mother had when he gets to be her age. Another professor said maybe he’d go back to school and study medicine the way he had always wanted.

My mother does not need to work, but she is already checking out the job market with her classmates. She’d like to find a 9-5 job with the government down in Washington, D.C. near four of her children. At her age, she needs a little flex time. “I certainly would not want to work for a big law firm where you work 80 hours per week,” she said.

Leave that to the younger grads.

I asked my mom if she had any words of wisdom for other people her age who hadn’t yet accomplished what they wanted to in life. She said, “Do whatever you want to do now, not next year or the year after. If you really want to do something, get on the road to achieving your goal today. It is never too late.”

***

This passage is excerpted from Jeremy Goldstein's book, Grandma Goes To Law School - Why It's Never Too Late To Live Your Dreams, about his mother, Jeanette. For a brand-new copy of the book, you can order it through the publisher, Dreamhouse Books.

Logic and Games

* Similarities between the Qaddafi family of Libya and the Bluth family of Arrested Development. [The New Republic]

* Lady Gaga threatens to sue London shop for selling breastmilk ice cream. [Salon]

* Busy lawyer's guide to Charlie Sheen's bitchin' termination letter. [Above The Law]

* Supreme Court rules that public universities must fund religious student groups with activities money. [Gawker]

* A bit of correlation/causation argument: girls who post more Facebook photos value their appearance more. [The Atlantic]

* The differences between books and electronics. [YouTube]


June 2011 LSAT vs. October 2011 LSAT

LSAT Blog June 2011 LSAT October 2011 LSAT(This post is based upon the assumption that you're taking the LSAT less than a year before you intend to apply to law school. If you're planning way ahead, this won't apply to you.)

Benefits of taking the June LSAT
  • It's better for your law school admissions chances because it allows you to apply at the beginning of the admissions cycle. Law schools typically begin accepting applications September 1, September 15, October 1, or October 15. Applying at the beginning of the cycle is especially important for top law schools.
  • You can be done with the LSAT sooner. If the June LSAT goes well, you can be done with it for good and relax this summer.
  • You have more chances to retake. If the June LSAT doesn't go well (or if you're sick, have a family issue, someone vomits on you during the test, etc.) and you have to retake, you can retake in October and still apply relatively early in the cycle.
  • The June LSAT is the only LSAT offered in the afternoon. No need to get on an early sleep schedule. If you take it outside a city, you may not have to go to the trouble of sleeping away from home the night before.
  • The June LSAT is the only LSAT offered on a Monday. Normally, Sabbath observers have to take the LSAT on a different date than everyone else, and LSAC does not release Sabbath tests (scroll to bottom). This means Sabbath test-takers never get to see their exam booklet and answer sheet. However, because the regular June LSAT is on a Monday, all test-takers (except those outside North America) get to see their exam booklet and answer sheet. This is useful for planning a retake.

Benefits of taking the October LSAT
  • Maybe you like getting up super-early, and the afternoon is too late for you to think.
  • You don't have to (seriously) begin your studying now.
  • Additionally, if you're a college student, consider:
* The June LSAT is offered soon after most schools' final exams typically end. You might not want to divide your attention between finals and LSAT studying in April and May.

* The October LSAT allows you the entire summer to study without being distracted by schoolwork (if you don't take summer classes). You still have to get through the first 1.5 months of the semester or so, but things probably won't be too intense that early in the semester. If you use the summer wisely, you can get through the vast majority of your LSAT studying then.

***

What do you all think? What's impacting your decision re: June vs. October?
Photo by asmythie

Private LSAT Tutoring

LSAT Blog Private LSAT TutoringI offer in-person tutoring in NYC and distance tutoring via phone/Internet.

Should you be interested in more information about my services, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com

Best regards,
Steve Schwartz


Photo via Wikimedia Commons


Law School Study Partners: Pick Hot Chick, Not Smart Chick?

LSAT Blog Law School Study Partners Video"Mr. Law School" gives some questionable advice about how to pick a law school study partner in his YouTube video, "Pick the Hot Chick NOT the smart chick" (video also below the quote). Thoughts?

He says:
In law school, there's gonna be a lot of classes where you gotta work with a partner. Some might say, 'hey - pick somebody who's smart,' but that's not the advice I'm gonna give you. Guys out there - what I want you to do is, pick the hottest chick possible...

Is it an enjoyable experience to do law school work? No. It's not enjoyable. But, it'll make it that much better when you have to do the work having a hot chick next to you. Working with her, seeing her every day, maybe you can get her to go booze after. Who the hell knows? But it could lead to something.






***

Do any of the hot and smart ladies reading this have some thoughts on Mr. Law School's advice?

And guys out there - what sort of study partners do you plan to pick? Will you do what Mr. Law School suggests?

***

Read some Law School Diaries for other takes on the law school experience.

Photo of Tina Fey via Wikimedia Commons

LSAT Diary: Prep and Studying During College

LSAT Blog Prep Studying During CollegeThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Katherine, a college student in Colorado.

In this diary, she balances her LSAT prep with college and a variety of distractions, and she begins to get used to taking sections under timed conditions.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com. (You can be in LSAT Diaries whether you've taken the exam already or not.)

Please leave her some encouragement below in the comments!

Katherine's LSAT Diary:

Day 1

Well, Day 1 was technically several months ago when I started my LSAT prep course, but this is Day 1, take two. Which really should’ve been last Thursday. A little background, I go to a “unique” school – we operate on the block plan, meaning that we take a semester worth of class in 3.5 weeks (they’d transfer out at 4 hrs and we take 4 a semester) and then get a glorious 4.5 day weekend before starting our next block.

I was supposed to kick back my LSAT studying that day, but I decided going to New Mexico would be more fun – and it definitely was. I took the equivalent of a practice test over the weekend and scored a 156. Oops (although, I’m reassured that even taking a test with blaring pop music on the radio and in a moving car I don’t score in the 140s). I’ve focused my studying more on sections – why?

Time isn’t an issue for me. I scored a 160 on my first practice and by my third was scoring a 165. I know where I need to improve and I know what sections I’m capable of acing (scored nearly perfectly on my first RC section, haven’t replicated that since). I also know I need to rise at least 5 more points – which seems like such a doable amount that I’m worried I’m going to have trouble motivating myself.

So day one, which was also day one of my second block - I woke up at 5:30 am to make a 6 am yoga class. Showered, went to breakfast at 7:30 and did a logic games section until the cafeteria got too noisy. Haven’t checked out how I did, but feel pretty confident. The section only took me 25 minutes too, which is good because when I assess my mistakes I know I have a lot of extra time. Then I went to class from 9-12, had a meeting for a departmental student committee that I run, worked out some logistics for that, and went to the grocery store (which was an ordeal because I was only purchasing cupcake mix for an event I’m hosting this week).

More background on me – I’m in a sorority and my first months back at school were overwhelmed by Formal Recruitment. That was the reason I didn’t get a solid start to my studying back when I returned to school, I was constantly running errands/essentially living at our chapter lodge – I was also taking a 300 level class for my major with a difficult professor. But that’s over and I’m reasonably confident in my class performance. Now I just have one more informal recruitment event to contend with this week and after that I’m off the hook, meaning allllll LSAT alllll the time (not really).


Day 2

Woke up. Went to class. Went to yoga. Went to my sorority house to bake cupcakes for an event on Wednesday. I intended to knock out both my class reading and my practice sections, but ran into a friend at the house – talked all afternoon while baking the cupcakes instead. Then had a dinner date with a few friends that lasted over an hour. When I arrived back at my apartment I had a few hundred pages of reading and a section of the LSAT to contend with. I did a Logical Reasoning section before doing my reading and going to bed. Not the best day of studying, but a good day nonetheless.


Day 3

Class, then yoga, the usual - After yoga I sat down and finished the test – didn’t do as well as I hoped, 158 – lowest score in a while, but higher than the one from break. Interesting was that I missed questions in clumps – like 5 in a row at once, but would ace the rest of the section. This is clearly an attention problem. Time isn’t an issue – I’m finishing sections too quickly (25 minutes on average). The plan for Thursday is to go over the questions I’ve missed on the past two tests and see where I went wrong – about 4 of them was a case of second guessing my first answer and changing it, clearly won’t be doing that anymore.

Was happy with my logic games section – it wasn’t near perfect, but I aced two of the four games and then did well enough on the others. I was worried I’d be out of practice. I still need to work on RC, its frustrating because I know I’m capable of acing that section (on my first practice ever I only missed one question) but I haven’t been able to tap into the necessary focus when studying. I think Friday I’m going to attempt to take a timed practice test – actually force myself to use 35 minutes per section to go back. For now I need to do some homework before my event tonight.


Day 4

So today was the first day in a few weeks where I haven’t had a meeting or an event to prepare for/attend. So obviously I was productive… except not. I got out of class around 11:30 (half an hour early), which threw off my plan to go to yoga at 2 – so I went at 12:30 instead. When I got back to my apartment, I had a plan in mind – facebook some photos, review my answers on a few PrepTests, but instead I decided to paint my nails and watch a documentary on crosswords (Wordplay, check it out!). I also did some research on the LSAC website and LSAT Blog so the time wasn’t completely wasted.

From 5-9PM I went over my tests and reworked logic games (took an hour break to watch The Office and 30 Rock). As I suspected, my problems were from points where I was either distracted [in a car, not focused because I wanted to do something else] or out of laziness. Six of the questions I missed on one test were due to not sticking with my first answer. While I’m still annoyed with the 158, I see some easy ways to improve. One is to make myself use the full 35 minutes for each section – even if I’m just sitting at my desk until the time is up. I’m finishing sections in 25-27 minutes (I track it while I take the test), which is great, but I’m clearly rushing/not as focused.

Tomorrow I’m planning on taking a timed test – I’ll be doing 5 sections, I’m not going to do the essay, but I am going to throw in an experimental section (probably a second logic games section just to screw with me/get more practice). I think this week has been a good way to test the waters and tomorrow’s practice test will hopefully boost my confidence and help me refocus.

Then, it's homecoming weekend, so while I know I should be going out in moderation to maximize my studying, the LSAT is still 9 weeks away so I’m going to take advantage of the festivities. Planning on taking my test and partying my way through the rugby game and the evening. Now I just have a ton of reading to contend with, but hopefully I’ll finish at a reasonable hour so I can get a goodnight sleep and have an effective practice test!


Day 5

General day, class then yoga – no variation, clearly I like a routine! Headed to the library around 2:45 to take my first timed practice test since July – scored a 162, respectable, comforting, but nowhere near what I feel I’m capable of. I did five sections – threw in the logic games section another test during my 4th section, meaning I did LR, RC, LG, LG, LR. Took the test with the LSAT proctor MP3 - in the background, between that and the noise of the ventilation system of the library, it was a good amount of distraction to contend with. Will definitely use it again.

Did reasonably well on my LG within the test – only missed two, which is unheard of for me, especially as I struggled with the games while taking the test. On my LG section, I had an easier time with 3 of the 4 games, missing only 4 questions from all of those – but one of the games was unlike any I had encountered and I bombed it (which I was expecting when I was trying to work it). Will be reviewing that game a few times! Otherwise my weakest point was during the final section of LR – I missed 6 in a row! So while I missed 15 of those questions overall, 9 were in the 4th section.

I attribute this to test fatigue and falling prey to the LR tricks! On about half of my incorrect answers, I got it down to the correct answer and the one I ultimately decided on – meaning that if I study those and improve on my mistakes I can maybe take my LR down to only missing 7 or 8 questions total, which would bump up my score. RC was decent, not what I’m capable of I missed at least 1 question a passage, two on two of them. That can be improved – I just need to practice more.

This practice is exactly what I needed to restore my confidence, but force me to get my butt back in gear on studying. This week was a good start – 9 weeks out from the LSAT, plenty of time to improve to the score I know I can achieve. Well it's now 6 on a Friday afternoon and I’ve just missed one of the most beautiful days I’ve seen in a while, but that’s alright because now I can enjoy Homecoming weekend and take Saturday (and potentially Sunday) off from studying!


Day 6

Woke up at 5:30, went to yoga sculpt at 6. Mondays are busy - I have a sorority meeting and I lead a meeting of a departmental student committee, so if I don’t hit up the morning class, I generally can’t fit in a yoga class. I decided to take my practice book to the dining hall and do a section because I need to practice working with the distractions. This decision turned out to be a mistake as the first section was Reading Comprehension. I didn’t do well - I know Steve cautions against sleep inertia, but I thought after a cardio yoga class, the walk from campus to the studio, and a cold shower, I’d be awake enough to focus.

Right now I’m feeling a little defeated by RC. I don’t want to fear or hate this section, but its frustrating me to know end right now – I know I’m capable of acing it, but I haven’t been able to replicate that in awhile and my RC score is getting steadily weaker. It’s such an easy section to pick up points, so every time I miss questions I just picture my score dropping.

My weakest points are the science passages – I think one of my goals starting this week will be to read at least 4 dense science articles a week and attempt to understand them. I also think I’m going to make copies of RC sections from different tests before I mark up my book and force myself to practice ont hose sections repeatedly – I know its not always beneficial to rework passages I’ve already read, but I need more sections to practice. I'll be home for a weekend in around 3 weeks, so I’m going to bring my other two books back then.

I think using earlier LSATs as supplemental practice will give me a confidence boost that I can hopefully translate into a mental edge, but I’m still going to use the later PrepTests as my primary study sources. When I make mistakes on the other sections, it’s generally due to a lapse in focus. Since I did that section this morning – my goal for the afternoon/evening will be to review Friday’s practice test – especially that circular logic game.


Day 7

Another mediocre practice section – this time Logical Reasoning. Maybe we're just not meshing? Am going to try and do the last two sections tomorrow, study on Thursday, practice test Friday. Not going to let this discourage me too much.


Day 8

Made another attempt at morning practice – got up at 5:30 for 6am yoga. Did a Logic Games section after breakfast. Not a great showing. Spent another half hour going over yesterday's LR section and the LG game section I just did. Realized I made some fairly careless mistakes. I’ve been feeling pretty tired this week so that’s probably not helping. My normally 3-hour class lasted for 5 hours and then I went to meet with a professor to discuss political science events and programming for the school year. Had another meeting tonight so I couldn’t work then. Am aiming to finish the final section, start a paper, and review my mistakes on past exams.


Day 9

Soundly defeated by another PrepTest, lowest score ever. Its been a weird week and I’ve been distracted by personal issues. Not going to dwell on it. Going to get a good night's sleep tonight and have a great practice test tomorrow.


Logic and Games

* Would you rather go to a traditional law school or a new-agey interdiscplinary one? [WSJ Law Blog]

* UVA Law beer pong party features Confederate flag table. [Above The Law]

* Corrupt police department literally makes ticketing into a game for one town's cops. [Gawker]

* Blue whales should all have cancer, but they don't. Maybe they can help us. [Discover]

* NYC councilman wants to register bikes as if they were cars. I preferred the 2008 congestion pricing plan. [Village Voice]

* Does the world's most persistent/stupid bank robber get away? [YouTube]

* Westboro Baptist Church wins Supreme Court free speech case. [Huffington Post]

Choosing a Law School Using US News Rankings

LSAT Blog Choosing Law School USNews RankingsMalcolm Gladwell recently critiqued the U.S. News law school rankings. Those rankings have been an institution for quite some time.

Whichever ranking system you favor, some thoughts:

How should you use law school rankings when making a decision?

Because the rankings are such a widely-used indicator of a law school's prestige, it's important to be aware of them at the very least.

To ignore them would be paying over $100,000 for something when you don't know its value.

Of course, the rankings are far from perfect, but you can still use them as a starting point when thinking about where to apply.

After all, it's overwhelming to wade through the dozens of pamphlets, folders, and emails you'll soon be receiving from law schools (if you haven't started receiving them already). Having an outside evaluator like U.S. News to cut through the clutter with some hard numbers is incredibly useful.

They can:

-serve as a general guideline to help you get a sense of a law school's prestige.

-give you a sense of how others would view your having attended a given school.

-help you determine the schools to which you have a realistic chance of acceptance given your LSAT score and undergraduate GPA.

If you haven't yet taken the LSAT, but have a sense of what your undergraduate GPA is or will be, you can figure out what kind of LSAT numbers you'll likely need to have a strong chance at a particular law school.

As such, the rankings can help you to formulate a list of law schools to which you should apply, helping you to select safety schools, match schools, and reach schools.




How much should you actually let the rankings influence your decisions?

The importance of the rankings will vary from person to person. In large part, it depends on the type of law you wants to practice after law school.

If you're looking to go to a corporate law firm, the rankings are very important. Many law firms disproportionately recruit from certain law schools and are significantly more likely to consider a resume from a "T14" school than others ("T14" is a term used to refer to the 14 law schools consistently listed in the top 14 of the U.S. News law school rankings).

However, if you're looking to practice in other areas (such as human rights law), become a sole practitioner (opening your own law firm), use your law degree simply to add to your skill set for your already-existing business, or in conjunction with another graduate degree, the law school's ranking and national reputation may not mean as much.



Enough about the rankings - what else matters?

Financial Aid:

Well, if you're the kind of person who's not planning to write one big check for law school tuition without batting an eye, you may want to seriously consider financial aid offers.

Many law schools will give merit aid to woo applicants with LSAT scores higher than the school's typical student. If your LSAT score's significantly higher than their average, schools will likely want to grab you to help you boost their position in the rankings. They might be willing to pay you for the privilege with reduced tuition costs.


Location:

It's also important to recognize that rankings don't take into account the fact that a law school is always better-known in its region of the country than elsewhere.

For example, if you want to practice law in NYC, you might want to consider Fordham over UCLA, even though UCLA has a higher US News ranking. NYC law firms and residents are more familiar with Fordham Law and its graduates than those of UCLA Law. After all, a significantly greater number of Fordham law graduates settle and practice in NYC than do UCLA law graduates.

There's also the fact that public universities offer lower tuition to in-state residents. If you've established in-state residence, you can take advantage of lower tuition if accepted. Public (state) law schools also set aside a certain number of seats for in-state residents, so it can be easier to gain acceptance if you've established residence.


***

For further reading, see this U.S. News law school rankings article in which I'm featured.

***

Which other factors are affecting which law schools you're considering?

Logical Reasoning: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

LSAT Blog Logical Reasoning Necessary Sufficient ConditionsLSAT Blog reader Vicky recently wrote with the following:

"I know you have already covered the sufficient and necessary conditions quite extensively, but there are still many (myself included) who are still stymied by it.

If you feel that the explanation I provide below is accurate and acceptable, posting it as an introductory Logical Reasoning topic might help other LSAT students."

I found Vicky's explanation to be useful and have included an edited version of it below.

Please thank Vicky in the comments for sharing her tips with everyone!

Vicky's Tips on Understanding Sufficient / Necessary Conditions:

Dealing with the concepts of Sufficient and Necessary conditions becomes a whole lot easier if I think of them in mutually-exclusive terms.

I consider the introduction of a new entity, the outcome/objective of these conditions, and, in some instances, with the sufficient condition being a specific example/small part of the bigger necessary condition.

For example, the limo example from Steve's blog post titled, LSAT Logic: Sufficient vs. Necessary Conditions: If I take a limo somewhere, I'll go somewhere

My interpretation is this:

- go somewhere = outcome/objective

- take a limo somewhere = sufficient condition

- traveling somehow, by any means possible, (such as: walk, limo, spaceship, teleport, have a friend wrap you up in a bouncy material and roll you across town to your destination...) = necessary condition

- taking a limo somewhere is a form of traveling. However, taking a limo somewhere is not the only form of traveling.

As such, the sufficient condition is a specific example/subset of the necessary condition. Traveling in general doesn't require that you take a limo somewhere. Like Darth Vader and Star Wars. Like Superman and superheroes. Like LSAT and traditional law school admission. (Do I need to seek professional help here?)


From knowing you got somewhere, we know/safely assume the necessary condition is met - you traveled. However, we can't automatically assume that you took a limo somewhere

From knowing that you took a limo somewhere, we can safely assume you got somewhere - the outcome is met. This also automatically satisfies the necessary condition of traveling.

The necessary condition is automatically met when the sufficient condition is met.

If the necessary condition is not met, the sufficient condition is automatically not met.

The necessary condition might be met without the sufficient condition being met.

This is relevant to page 25 of the LSAT SuperPrep / pages 30-31 of the LSAT Handbook. On these pages, LSAC says there are only 2 possible inferences that can be made from a statement that includes a necessary condition and 2 from a statement that includes a sufficient condition.

NC = necessary condition
SC = sufficient condition

NC #1. Infer from knowing that the NC is NOT met, the outcome does NOT occur = Not NC --> not outcome

NC #2. Infer from knowing that if the outcome occurs, the NC is met = outcome --> NC

SC #1. Infer from knowing that if SC is met, the outcome occurs = SC --> outcome

SC #2. Infer from knowing that if the outcome does not occur, the SC is not met = Not outcome --> not SC

***

“If I take a limo somewhere, I'll go somewhere.”

Scenario 1: I did not travel. So I didn’t go somewhere. I obviously didn’t take a limo somewhere

Not NC --> Not outcome --> Not SC

Scenario 2: I took a limo somewhere. So I went somewhere. I've obviously traveled.

SC --> outcome --> NC

Photo by livenature

LSAT Diary: Studying While Working Full-Time

LSAT Blog Diary Studying Working Full TimeThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Justin, a 25-year-old who's studying for the LSAT while holding a full-time job and attending college full-time. He's a pretty busy guy.

In this LSAT Diary, he talks about balancing it all as he starts off his prep.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com. (You can be in LSAT Diaries whether you've taken the exam already or not.)

Please leave Justin some encouragement below in the comments!

Justin's LSAT Diary:

When you are growing up, everyone tells you to dream big. Dreaming big was always something I was capable of and now at the age of 25, I find myself shooting big again. I am looking to conquer the June 2011 LSAT.

You always hear, “the LSAT is a learnable test” and “the LSAT can be taught.” It certainly gets you excited and makes you eager to hit the books to learn as much as you can. Once you start reading and gaining small insights into the mind of the beast, you get excited and want more! Preparation ends up being a delicate balance of time and time management.

For me, I have gone a non-traditional route to this point. While only being 25, I have nearly 6 years of professional work experience. I enrolled in college right after high school, but at the time it wasn’t a good fit for me. Sadly, my grades reflected that. I opted to gain some work experience in the mean time with an eye on returning to finish my degree when the time was right.

That time came recently. Ironically, the thought of a career in law came along with it.
So here I am, writing a diary, studying for the LSAT, working full-time, and attending school full-time. Having to juggle multiple balls in the air makes it tough, but it's not impossible. I was ecstatic to come across the LSAT Blog and what Steve has put together here. Once I found the site, I decided to purchase the 5-month day-by- day LSAT study plan. This plan gives me a chance to plan my week ahead of time, which is perfect for me.

In week 1 of the plan, I am tackling basic linear games, which I have had some moderate success with. It seems that each time you have a little success; the LSAT finds a way to throw a crazy game at you. I thought these games were supposed to be basic linear games?

One element that I have added to my study plan is to create a binder with the questions that I answered incorrectly in the eyes of the test-makers. (But I must say, I think my answers are great.) In this binder, I place the questions I answer incorrectly and write a description as to what the right answer is and why my answer is incorrect. I plan to review the binder at the conclusion of each week. In my review of the binder, I am hoping to discover any trends in my answers. I hope this will pay off in a few months when I begin to tackle Logical Reasoning.

I am always open to suggestions and comments. I hope that this diary will serve as motivation for those who are looking to strike a life balance when studying for the LSAT. In hoping to provide some motivation, I would like to share a link to a video clip that should serve to motivate and inspire all of us during our LSAT prep.

Until next time, may your prep be effective and may you learn something from your mistakes!

Photo by offshore

Complete Logical Reasoning Explanations Update

I've added explanations for the Logical Reasoning sections of LSAT PrepTests 61 and 62 (the October 2010 LSAT and December 2010 LSAT) to that mega-PDF - the Complete Logical Reasoning Explanations for Recent PrepTests.

If you haven't bought them yet, be sure to check out more about these Logical Reasoning explanations.

Logic and Games

* For all the ladies out there planning to become lawyers before getting married, and the men who love them. [YouTube]

* LSAT studying often requires coffee. Here are 15 things worth knowing about coffee. [The Oatmeal]

* Two great scenes from My Cousin Vinny, a classic law movie featuring Joe Pesci. [YouTube]

* I kinda wish the author had saved this scary story for Halloween, but I can always read it again then. [Hyperbole and a Half]

* Glenn Beck suggests boycotting Google for assisting in democratic revolutions. Will he switch to Mubarakvista? [Ars Technica]

* Obama tells Department of Justice to stop defending the (anti-gay-marriage) Defense of Marriage Act. [NYTimes]

* Canadian police tell female law students "don't dress like a slut" to avoid attacks. [Above The Law]