Professor Derek Muller at Pepperdine University School of Law recently contacted LSAC to find out which college majors get the best (and worst) LSAT scores.
His findings:
His findings:
Your Guide to a Higher Score
In law school, there's gonna be a lot of classes where you gotta work with a partner. Some might say, 'hey - pick somebody who's smart,' but that's not the advice I'm gonna give you. Guys out there - what I want you to do is, pick the hottest chick possible...
Is it an enjoyable experience to do law school work? No. It's not enjoyable. But, it'll make it that much better when you have to do the work having a hot chick next to you. Working with her, seeing her every day, maybe you can get her to go booze after. Who the hell knows? But it could lead to something.
Thanks for the blog and all of the valuable information. I've made considerable progress with your help. The LSAT took over my life for several months and now that I can see the light at the end of the tunnel, I made these cookies last night. Wish I could share them with everyone taking the test on Saturday. Good luck to everyone.Lisa, I wish we could all eat them, too!
In contrast to The Official LSAT PrepTest 42, which started in such a strong and entertaining fashion, only to peter out midway through, and this title's sequel The Official LSAT PrepTest 44, which lacks the focused coherence that makes the best titles of this series without peer, The Official LSAT PrepTest 43 manages to get everything just right.
Other reviewers may disagree, but I think this could well be the most exciting book of the series --- even better perhaps than the seminal The Official LSAT PrepTest 18, which most admirers of this collection have long held as the most outstanding volume of PrepTest yet assembled, not just for the LSAT, but for any aptitude test in any field.
I can't speak highly enough of The Official LSAT PrepTest 43. It's a marvelous, life-changing PrepTest guide.
One thing is for certain: I did better than the woman near me who ran out of the room screaming and crying during hour 4. And the 27 people who bailed out at the break!
I mean, since we were all there to take the LSAT, which is to get into law school, which produces lawyers who wear suits, I figured it’d be fun to see what everyone looked like in a suit.
Jesus is in the desk next to me. He looks pretty calm, but I know deep down he would rather not take this test.
I peed five times in the 30 minutes I had before starting the test.
who cares if I blow this test out of the water and get a 170-something or if I bomb it completely. As long as I wake up tomorrow and know that God loves me, is saving me, and I worship him with my life then anything else really is just....something else.Greg took the LSAT the day after competing in a triathlon. Needless to say, he had a tough time doing both:
I'm not taking the LSAT the day after doing any race again.Juan Diaz, the boxer, decided not to take it yet, having similar difficulties balancing his training with LSAT prep:
I wanted to make sure I was scoring a little higher than the average so if something was to go wrong on test day, I've already calculated those factors...I don't think I was prepared to the fullest capacity I could've been. I started training and working out, it started getting a little tougher.
It is understandable that you might be a little bit apprehensive because you do not know me, Please forgive this unusual manner to contact you, but this particular letter/email is of exceptional and private nature, as by virtue of my position in Hang Seng Bank - Hong Kong.
i have a lucrative business proposal of mutual interest to share with you. I will need you to assist me in executing a business project from our bank worth US$25.5 Million.
There is a sum of $19,500,000.00 in my bank Hang Seng Bank, Hong Kong. There were no beneficiaries stated concerning these funds which means no one would ever come to claim it. That is why I ask that we work together.I was excited about the first email until I got the second. The chances of getting two similar, yet unusual, proposals a day apart seemed highly unlikely, suggesting a scam.
I solicit for your assistance in effecting this transaction. I intend to give 30% of the total funds as compensation for your assistance. I will notify you on the full transaction and details of the transaction on receipt of your response if interested, And I shall send you the details and necessary procedures with which to make the transfer.
It is understandable that you might be a little bit apprehensive because you do not know me, Please forgive this unusual manner to contact youThis functions as a counterpremise. The spammer begins by acknowledging a weakness in the argument. Spammers understand most people are skeptical of anything in their spam mail folders. By pointing this out, the sender hopes to appear more legitimate. By pointing out that this is "unusual," the spammer tries to make us think that he isn't sending these kinds of emails all the time.
this particular letter/email is of exceptional and private nature, as by virtue of my vantage position in Hang Seng Bank - Hong Kong.The spammer begins to give evidence as to why he is sending this email. It's "exceptional" and "private." The fact that he has a position at the bank makes us more likely to believe the third part.
i have a lucrative business proposal of mutual interest to share with you. I will need you to assist me in executing a business project from our bank worth US$25.5 Million.The first sentence here isn't too important - it's basically just a background/filler sentence meant to get us interested. However, the second part pushes the envelope. Saying "I will need you to assist me" struck me as an unsupported conclusion. The author (spammer) offers no evidence as to why he needs me in particular. What special qualifications do I hold? Why can't the spammer carry out this "business project" on his own?
If someone has a "vantage position" in a bank, then he will be incapable of executing a business project on his own and will require the assistance of the LSAT tutor who runs LSAT Blog to carry out said business project.
There is a sum of $19,500,000.00 in my bank Hang Seng Bank, Hong Kong. There were no beneficiaries stated concerning these funds which means no one would ever come to claim it. That is why I ask that we work together.By itself, the first sentence is background. However, when combined with the 30% figure mentioned later in the stimulus, this becomes a reason (evidence) for me to work with the spammer.
I solicit for your assistance in effecting this transaction.This is the conclusion. It's a restatement of the previous sentence asking we work together. Just like real LSAT Logical Reasoning stimuli and Reading Comp passages, sometimes the author is redundant.
I intend to give 30% of the total funds as compensation for your assistance. I will notify you on the full transaction and details of the transaction on receipt of your response if interested, And I shall send you the details and necessary procedures with which to make the transfer.The 30% figure is giving a reason to engage in the deal, but the rest is just housekeeping (organizational) stuff. Nothing special.