2012 US News Law School Rankings Released

LSAT Blog 2012 US News Law School Rankings ReleasedThe 2012 U.S. News law school rankings were just released this week.

Here are the 2012 U.S. News Rankings for the top 14 law schools (some are tied):

1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago
6. NYU
7. Michigan
7. Penn
9. Berkeley
9. Virginia
11. Duke
12. Northwestern
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
14. Texas at Austin

There aren't too many huge changes to the top-14 law schools (the biggest is the addition of Texas), but U.S. News has begun ranking some of the lower-ranked law schools, rather than lumping them all together.

Lots of analysis (and links to other analysis) on AboveTheLaw, this U.S. News article, another one on changes in how the law school rankings are calculated, and one in the Wall Street Journal.

Finally, see my previous blog posts about the U.S. News rankings:

Choosing a Law School Using U.S. News Rankings

U.S. News Rankings Articles

More U.S. News Rankings Articles



Sudoku Puzzles for LSAT Logic Games Prep


"Sudoku for LSAT prep - on STEROIDS!"

If you're into sudoku, you've probably heard of DJAPE. His Samurai Sudoku puzzles appear in the Washington Post and many others around the world.

He's been kind enough to work with me to put together another sudoku book - a collection of sudoku puzzles and sudoku variants exclusively for LSAT Blog readers - LSAT Blog's More Sudoku Puzzles for LSAT Prep.

LSAT Blog Sudoku Book Covers



But why are there TWO books in the photo?

Because I've also put together a book of 208 easy-to-medium difficulty sudoku puzzles, along with a brief introduction to sudoku.


"What are sudoku variants?"

They're puzzles just like regular sudoku, only with a twist.

Sudoku variants can include things like:

outside sudoku, consecutive sudoku, jigsaw sudoku, diagonal sudoku, and tridoku.

If you've never heard of these variants, don't worry. The book explains how to approach all the included puzzles in the introduction.


This book contains 50 sudoku variant puzzles along with 300 regular sudoku puzzles. 

That's 350 puzzles altogether!


The puzzles are placed in order of increasing difficulty, and we've included the answers at the very end so that you can check your work or sneak a peek.


You can have this on your computer within minutes, and you can print out as many copies as you need.

You can print and carry a few of them with you, rather than having to carry an entire book. You can also print out multiple copies of the same puzzle so that you can do and redo it without having to erase.



Why practice sudoku for LSAT prep?

Many of you have been asking me for a good way to prepare for the Logic Games section without getting into the actual LSAT material.

And solving a sudoku puzzle requires a little something nerds call "deductive reasoning."

Basically - making inferences!

Sound familiar? It's the exact same thing you have to do in LSAT Logic Games, so sudoku's a great tool for developing the skills you need.



This sudoku book is for you:

if you plan to take the LSAT down the road and want to get an early start on your prep 

if you don't want to expose yourself to the limited number of real LSAT Logic Games out there

if you just want to take a break from the LSAT without completely wasting your time on social media and Netflix


Get both books (208 regular sudoku and DJAPE's book) for only $17.94:

CC



Get your copy of DJAPE's book for only $9.97:

CC



Get your copy of the 208 regular sudoku book for only $7.97:


CC



Fun Fact:

This is a PDF available for instant download. It'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.


P.S. DJAPE's book when paired with the one containing 208 easy-to-medium difficulty puzzles is a lethal combination.





LSAT Diary: Law School Acceptance Call

LSAT Blog Law School Acceptance Call LSAT DiaryThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Kerrianne, who previously wrote an LSAT Diary about her prep.

In this LSAT Diary, she updates us on her experiences (and acceptances!) in the law school admissions process.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com. (You can be in LSAT Diaries whether you've taken the exam already or not.)

Please congratulate Kerrianne below in the comments!

Kerrianne's LSAT Diary:I'm done with the LSAT and have been for awhile. My GPA is "good " and I go to a great school. The College of Business I am enrolled in is ranked nationally. My work experience is outstanding and I have been published for my research in my law professor's book.

Furthermore, I knew that I would have great letters of recommendation as I have worked hard for the past four years. I revised my resume and made it 2 pages (many law schools allow this because there is no interview and they want to get to know you as best as possible.)

I have applied to three schools so far and I really only want to apply to one more. I have been accepted to two of the three and I have yet to hear back from the other one. Funny enough I got accepted into a school in California that I didn't even apply to. Something about that makes me wonder... how could they grant admission to someone when they haven't viewed my resume or personal statement?

Anyway, so far my favorite part of the whole LSAT/Application process was that I attended Graduate School Fairs and Pre-Law Fairs and I developed a good relationship with the three recruiters from my top 3 favorite schools. I have been able to keep in contact with them for the past few months which has alleviated some stress in my life.

My applications went in the week of Christmas (Happy holidays, let me into your law school), and while I was still at home over break my cell phone rang. That is a pretty weird thing to happen as I despise talking on the phone and anyone who has my number knows that. I didn't answer the phone because I didn't recognize the number, but when I listened to the voicemail I heard the voice of one of the recruiters telling me to call her. I immediately thought "What did I forget to do on my application?" I called her back, we made small talk, and after a few minutes she told me that she was calling to congratulate me on my acceptance into their law school.

6 days before my letter of acceptance crossed her desk. You can try to imagine my excitement as I thought the call was about me messing up my application only to find out that I was accepted into the law program. It is worth it to communicate frequently with the recruiters. I jumped up and down for awhile, told my mom, called my dad, text my sisters, and emailed the attorney I work for. I will always remember that call because it made my dream a reality:

I am officially going to law school!

While I wait to hear back from another school or two more I have considered retaking the LSAT, as a higher score (I kid you not - one point higher than my score) would make me eligible for good scholarships, but I've decided against it. Why you ask? Retaking the LSAT is a $200 investment that can save me $1,000's. I've gone back and forth over this decision but really it is quite easy. I spent a huge portion of my Senior year fall semester hunched over with my nose in every LSAT book I could find, I did my LSAT time and I'm done. Loans will cover my expenses and when I am the next big attorney I can pay them off. For now I will enjoy my senior year as much as I can (though I still have two jobs and 17 credit hours.)

The LSAT helped me reformat my discipline and study habits, I got straight A's last semester with two jobs with that silly LSAT test consuming my life.

The LSAT is over for me, its time to usher some new law school hopefuls into the "worry zone." I've spent far too long here and I'm happy to leave. I will be in law school in a mere 6 months and I cannot wait.

I wish the best to all of you Law School hopefuls. The stress can be awful but it will all be worth it when you have a law school education.

I hope my ramblings have eased the pain of studying (if nothing else I got you away from those PrepTests for a little while.)

Photo by cfortier

Logic and Games

* Please donate to the Red Cross and help those affected by the crisis in Japan. Don't send socks. [Red Cross; Socks for Japan]

* Should I link to the NYTimes less often since most of you will soon have a limited number of free articles you can read there? [NYTimes]

* Details about how companies sell your personal information. [Time]

* Bret Easton Ellis writes about why Charlie Sheen's cult of personality is so effective. [The Daily Beast]

* Jail tries to confiscate inmate's hard-earned savings. [Chicago Tribune]

* Undercover government video shows footage of high-pressure sales tactics and deception used by for-profit colleges. [YouTube]



Arguments and Contrapositives | Necessary and Sufficient Assumptions

LSAT Blog Arguments Contrapositives Assumptions Necessary SufficientI spend a great deal of time talking about the difference between Necessary Assumption and Sufficient Assumption questions in the LSAT's Logical Reasoning section.

Arguments assume a link between the evidence and conclusion presented - this link can often easily be framed as a conditional statement.

Because the contrapositive of this statement is simply a rewording of the argument itself, the contrapositive of that statement is both necessary and sufficient for that argument to work.

As such, it can serve as the correct answer to both Necessary Assumption and Sufficient Assumption questions.

***

Necessary Assumption
Let's start with the fact that the contrapositive of an argument's evidence-conclusion link can serve as a necessary assumption.

I mean that if X -> Y is an argument, then NOT Y -> NOT X is a necessary assumption (an assumption required) for that argument to be valid.

After all, if the contrapositive were negated, then the original statement would not be valid either, and the argument wouldn't be valid. As such, the original statement requires the contrapositive to be true as well.

***

Sufficient Assumption

Additionally, the contrapositive of an argument's evidence-conclusion link can serve as a sufficient assumption.

I mean that if X -> Y is an argument, then NOT Y -> NOT X is an assumption that is sufficient for the argument to be valid. What I mean is that if we're told, as new information, that NOT Y -> NOT X is valid, it must be the case that the argument itself (X -> Y) is also valid. This is because if the contrapositive of a statement is valid, then the original must also be valid, since they're logically equivalent.

This is all a bit abstract, but let's look at it with a couple of examples from real LSAT questions:

Necessary Assumption example:

(Please see PrepTest 36 (December 2001 LSAT), Section 3, Question 16 - page 275 in Next 10)

In this argument, the stimulus tells us (paraphrased):

Because reptiles can't make big behavioral changes when the environmental changes a lot, reptiles aren't capable of engaging in advanced thought

In shorthand, the argument is saying:

NOT capable of big behavior changes with environmental changes -> Not capable of complex thought

The contrapositive of this statement would be something like:

Capable of complex thought -> capable of big behavioral changes with environmental changes

In other words:

If an animal is capable of complex thought, then it must be capable of making big behavioral changes as the environment goes through big changes.

Choice D of this question pretty much says just that.

Again, if an original conditional statement that forms the core of an argument is considered to be true, then it is required that its contrapositive also be true in order for that argument to work.



Sufficient Assumption example:

(Please see PrepTest 36 (December 2001 LSAT), Section 1, Question 26 - page 261 in Next 10)

In this argument, the stimulus tells us (paraphrased):

Because Vermeer used expensive props, it must not be due to a scarcity of props that he kept using the same props over and over.

In shorthand, the argument is saying:

$ props -> NOT due to small # of props that V kept reusing them

The contrapositive of this statement would be something like:

If it were due to a small # of props that V kept reusing them, then NOT $ props.

In other words:

If it were due to a small number of props that Vermeer kept reusing the same ones, then he wouldn't have been using expensive props in the first place.

Choice E of this question pretty much says just that.

Again, if we're told, as new information in an answer choice, that the contrapositive of the argument is guaranteed to be true (or is "assumed"), then the original version of that conditional statement (the one in the argument) must also be true, and the argument is valid.

Photo by mitopencourseware

Law School Diary: The 80-Something Law Student

LSAT Blog Law School Diary Law StudentIn this Law School Diary, Jeremy gives us an excerpt from his memoir celebrating his mother, Jeanette.

Jeanette graduated from law school at the age of 83, impressed her professors and fellow students, and demonstrated that you're never too old to go to law school.


Jeanette's Law School Diary (as written by Jeremy):

When the Honorable Elijah Huling, Jr. first saw the 82-year-old woman walking into his medical malpractice class at Syracuse University, he thought she was a parent. It never crossed the judge’s mind that Jeanette Goldstein might be one of his students.

But she was.

“I was shocked,” the visiting law professor said.

Judge Huling’s next reaction was that Jeanette must be a part-time student at the College of Law.

But she wasn’t.

And so Judge Huling chuckled, recalling that first introduction in an interview at school. “Amazing,” he said. In fact, the Baldwinsville, N.Y., judge says Jeanette Goldstein was one of the most remarkable students he has ever had as a visiting professor at Syracuse University’s College of Law. She was, in fact, so remarkable that Judge Huling went home to have a heart-to-heart talk with his children after he met her. His children spent about a half hour per week-night on their homework, and Judge Huling scolded them.

You’d better spend a little more time on your studies because I have an 80-year-old student who’s working a lot harder than you!

Jeanette really did work hard.

Her determined motto: Be prepared.

Judge Huling, like all Jeanette’s Syracuse law professors, said Jeanette was always prepared for class. She studied hard for one of Judge Huling’s exams and refused to sign a petition against him after classmates decided the test was unfairly difficult.

Jeanette just stared at the grade next to her assigned student number after grades were posted. She had cataracts and thought she was reading the grade wrong. That couldn’t be a B next to her name, could it?

Jeanette asked Judge Huling to check the grade. “Is that mine?” she asked.

Yes, it was. Jeanette had scored one of the highest grades on an exam that most of her classmates thought had been one of the most difficult of their law school careers. Other students would be pleased just to pass, but Jeanette wanted a good grade.

“I’m amazed,” said Judge Huling, smiling during his interview. “The competition is intense and cut-throat here, and she’s sticking herself right in that competition. She is in the pool, swimming with all the rest of the sharks. It takes courage to do that. I know the environment, and to step out of a familiar environment takes a lot of courage. Courage and fortitude. She just gets in there and plugs away.”

Judge Huling didn’t know that going to law school had been my mother’s dream.

As long as I can remember, my mother wanted to be a lawyer. In fact, she has had this desire since 1955 when she flew to Japan with my father, David Goldstein, on a business trip. My father’s company made movie camera lenses, and my father was always looking for new optical products to sell. In 1955, my father signed a contract with Olympus Corporation of Japan to be the exclusive U.S. importer of their microscopes. My mother enjoyed sitting in on the contract negotiations. In fact, she came to feel she could do a better job than the lawyers.

Could she be a lawyer? My mother had five young children at the time and lived in Rochester, N.Y. She had someone to help her with the children, but still… where could she even go to law school? Rochester didn’t have one.

Forty-one years later, my father died and my mother was grief-stricken. Like so many widows, she’d lost the man she’d loved for over 50 years and didn’t know what to do with herself. Then she thought of her old dream, becoming a lawyer. “Better late than never,” she said.

But, what would we – her children – think? There were eight of us now, all of us grown adults. “I didn’t consider other people’s reactions so much as considering my children’s reactions,” my mother said. “And what surprised me is that even though I was convinced everyone would think I was crazy, they all supported me and thought it was a great idea!”


Here comes the student.

My mother got up the nerve to take the LSAT and apply to two law schools – Nova Southeastern University in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and Syracuse. To her surprise, both schools accepted her! My mother chose Syracuse because of its convenience – a little over an hour away from where she lived in Rochester.

Margery Connor, a former associate dean for student affairs at the College of Law who retired while my mother was a third-year student there, said that the school accepted her because her LSAT scores and her graduate school grades were good. “I looked at her resume,” Ms. Connor said. “Her numbers were enough to let her in.”

The school couldn’t discriminate against Jeanette because of her age. Besides, Ms. Connor said, “I really advocate for the non-traditional student.”

Ms. Connor knew that Jeanette’s age might actually benefit both students and faculty. “She had a point of view that she could share with people,” Ms. Connor said. It would come from her age.

“She is most special because she has had not only life experiences but she’s had business experiences too,” said Professor Frederick J. Micale, an adjunct professor. “She brings that to class and makes a real contribution. I think it’s not only something I appreciate, but other students do, too.”

Professor Micale said students respect the courage of someone Jeanette’s age to undertake the rigors of law. Syracuse had students from all over the world, and some had language and cultural barriers.

In Jeanette’s case, the barriers were physical, Professor Micale pointed out. Jeanette’s eyes and ears were starting to fail. She sat attentively in the front row of the lecture hall because she couldn’t see the board or screen if she sat any farther back. On the negative side, while sitting in front she couldn’t hear the students in the rear.

Administrators wondered if she had the stamina to stick it out.

“She drew a lot of attention and people had doubts,” Ms. Connor said. “Law school is rigorous. You don’t get a lot of rest. I was worried about her capacity to do it all.”

Ms. Connor suggested that Jeanette enroll part-time.

Jeanette refused.

So, in the fall of 2000, Jeanette sat down beside students in their 20’s and started scribbling away on that legal pad. She was the mother of eight children and the grandmother of 22. That was about the age of most of her classmates, too. There were a few doctors, engineers or social workers in their 50’s, and a retired nun had once taken courses at the law school. But Jeanette was the oldest. And, while most of the younger students clicked away on their laptops in class, Jeanette took notes in script. She couldn’t type or use a computer.

Students set their water bottles down and sat next to her, amazed at her initiative. “Everybody was talking about this 80-year-old,” said Jason Cleckner, a 23-year-old classmate who sat next to Jeanette in Civil Procedures class.

“Was there really a president named Ronald Reagan?”

Professors were dumbfounded that they actually had a student in class who had lived through Watergate or the Reagan and Carter eras, ancient events and presidents to these students who were born years after. Jeanette could nod her head when professors spoke of the Great Depression, too. She had lived through it.

“I can make a lot of references to something that happened quite a while ago,” said Professor Christian C. Day.

Whatever grades she earned in any of her classes were hers. Professors did not help her out. That’s because each student was assigned a number, and the number was all the professors ever saw on exams or papers – without ever knowing whose it was. Although Jeanette couldn’t type exams on a computer in class, the school assigned her a typist who sat beside her. Thus, all her work was evaluated without her professors ever knowing that it was hers.

The instructors, moreover, graded on a bell curve. Very few students received As, and a few did receive Ds and Fs. My mother passed all her courses and survived, while a small percentage of students were not performing up to expectation and were asked to leave.

To be honest, it wasn’t easy for my mother that first year either. She had a master’s degree in social work. But, she said, “social work was a breeze in comparison to law school.”

Maybe it was because my mother had been out of school for so many years. “The students coming directly out of college, they knew the shortcuts,” my mother said. “They knew aspects to get through the course much easier than I did.”

Nevertheless, she persevered that first year, even pulling all-nighters when she needed to.

Ms. Connor admitted that my mother had a rocky time. “The first year is the hardest. But she managed to get through it.”

After that first year, my mother started recommending classes to the students who were a year or two behind her.

“She was right on target, too,” said Chanel Hudson, 24, of San Francisco.

As the semesters passed and graduation neared, my mother’s confidence and physical strength grew. Each day, she was forced to take a brisk walk. She’d walk from her graduate student dormitory to the bus stop, and from the bus to the law school. Then, there was the return trip at night. The wind was often blowing and it seemed to snow for days in Syracuse. The winters were cruelly gray and cold. My mother fell on the ice one day during her third year and broke her wrist.

She got a cast, and kept right on wheeling her black book bag to class.


An enrichment for all

She was an inspiration to countless professors, counselors and students. She enriched the school demonstrating that someone her age can handle such a rigorous commitment.

Remember those administrators who had doubts that she could make it full-time? “She proved them all wrong,” Ms. Connor said.

My mother did not hesitate to speak up in class. Based on her experiences with my father’s company, she can discuss distributorships in her international relations class, and then wheel her black book bag to the next lecture hall to share what she knows about negotiations.

“I admired her viewpoint,” said Professor Day.

“She has a good background of life’s experiences that I don’t have,” said Judge Huling.

“She brought the life experiences you couldn’t get from a textbook, the stuff of real law,” said Professor Micale.

In fact, though Professor Micale has thirty years of international law experience, “She knows more than I do,” he said. “When your mother speaks, she becomes the teacher and I become the student.”

He said he felt privileged to have had her in his class. “It’s just an absolute special treat to me because – and I think the best way I can sum it up is – I can truly become a student in my own class by listening to her, and that is the ultimate.”

My mother used to complain that her back bothered her. Luckily, any physical problems my mother had when entering law school began to disappear. In fact, my mother didn’t have time to think about her physical ailments. Her back problem miraculously disappeared. So did some of her concerns about the future. “You don’t think about getting old or dying while you are busy everyday,” my mother said.

Being around young people energized my mother, and her outlook on life brightened. She began to realize that it wasn’t healthy for older people to move into retirement homes with other elderly people. It was far better to be around a mix of people who still spoke about joyful things and didn’t complain about physical ailments all day.

The benefits ran both ways, too. Not only did my mother feel better about herself, succeeding in younger camp, but those younger students profited from her shared experiences. Her comments about what she had learned from my father’s international business experiences piqued their curiosity, Professor Micale said, and “the questions seemed to roll from that point.”

Ms. Connor said she “said so many prayers” that my mother would make it through school. But, she added, “her success was based on her determination and conscientiousness. She really worked at it.”


The Graduate!

Ms. Connor read my mother’s name at the graduation ceremony on May 15th when she graduated at 83. “It enriched my life,” said Ms. Connor of the experience. “My hat’s off to her.”

Professor Micale said he hoped that he had as much vitality as my mother had when he gets to be her age. Another professor said maybe he’d go back to school and study medicine the way he had always wanted.

My mother does not need to work, but she is already checking out the job market with her classmates. She’d like to find a 9-5 job with the government down in Washington, D.C. near four of her children. At her age, she needs a little flex time. “I certainly would not want to work for a big law firm where you work 80 hours per week,” she said.

Leave that to the younger grads.

I asked my mom if she had any words of wisdom for other people her age who hadn’t yet accomplished what they wanted to in life. She said, “Do whatever you want to do now, not next year or the year after. If you really want to do something, get on the road to achieving your goal today. It is never too late.”

***

This passage is excerpted from Jeremy Goldstein's book, Grandma Goes To Law School - Why It's Never Too Late To Live Your Dreams, about his mother, Jeanette. For a brand-new copy of the book, you can order it through the publisher, Dreamhouse Books.

Logic and Games

* Similarities between the Qaddafi family of Libya and the Bluth family of Arrested Development. [The New Republic]

* Lady Gaga threatens to sue London shop for selling breastmilk ice cream. [Salon]

* Busy lawyer's guide to Charlie Sheen's bitchin' termination letter. [Above The Law]

* Supreme Court rules that public universities must fund religious student groups with activities money. [Gawker]

* A bit of correlation/causation argument: girls who post more Facebook photos value their appearance more. [The Atlantic]

* The differences between books and electronics. [YouTube]


June 2011 LSAT vs. October 2011 LSAT

LSAT Blog June 2011 LSAT October 2011 LSAT(This post is based upon the assumption that you're taking the LSAT less than a year before you intend to apply to law school. If you're planning way ahead, this won't apply to you.)

Benefits of taking the June LSAT
  • It's better for your law school admissions chances because it allows you to apply at the beginning of the admissions cycle. Law schools typically begin accepting applications September 1, September 15, October 1, or October 15. Applying at the beginning of the cycle is especially important for top law schools.
  • You can be done with the LSAT sooner. If the June LSAT goes well, you can be done with it for good and relax this summer.
  • You have more chances to retake. If the June LSAT doesn't go well (or if you're sick, have a family issue, someone vomits on you during the test, etc.) and you have to retake, you can retake in October and still apply relatively early in the cycle.
  • The June LSAT is the only LSAT offered in the afternoon. No need to get on an early sleep schedule. If you take it outside a city, you may not have to go to the trouble of sleeping away from home the night before.
  • The June LSAT is the only LSAT offered on a Monday. Normally, Sabbath observers have to take the LSAT on a different date than everyone else, and LSAC does not release Sabbath tests (scroll to bottom). This means Sabbath test-takers never get to see their exam booklet and answer sheet. However, because the regular June LSAT is on a Monday, all test-takers (except those outside North America) get to see their exam booklet and answer sheet. This is useful for planning a retake.

Benefits of taking the October LSAT
  • Maybe you like getting up super-early, and the afternoon is too late for you to think.
  • You don't have to (seriously) begin your studying now.
  • Additionally, if you're a college student, consider:
* The June LSAT is offered soon after most schools' final exams typically end. You might not want to divide your attention between finals and LSAT studying in April and May.

* The October LSAT allows you the entire summer to study without being distracted by schoolwork (if you don't take summer classes). You still have to get through the first 1.5 months of the semester or so, but things probably won't be too intense that early in the semester. If you use the summer wisely, you can get through the vast majority of your LSAT studying then.

***

What do you all think? What's impacting your decision re: June vs. October?
Photo by asmythie

Private LSAT Tutoring

LSAT Blog Private LSAT TutoringI offer in-person tutoring in NYC and distance tutoring via phone/Internet.

Should you be interested in more information about my services, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com

Best regards,
Steve Schwartz


Photo via Wikimedia Commons


Law School Study Partners: Pick Hot Chick, Not Smart Chick?

LSAT Blog Law School Study Partners Video"Mr. Law School" gives some questionable advice about how to pick a law school study partner in his YouTube video, "Pick the Hot Chick NOT the smart chick" (video also below the quote). Thoughts?

He says:
In law school, there's gonna be a lot of classes where you gotta work with a partner. Some might say, 'hey - pick somebody who's smart,' but that's not the advice I'm gonna give you. Guys out there - what I want you to do is, pick the hottest chick possible...

Is it an enjoyable experience to do law school work? No. It's not enjoyable. But, it'll make it that much better when you have to do the work having a hot chick next to you. Working with her, seeing her every day, maybe you can get her to go booze after. Who the hell knows? But it could lead to something.






***

Do any of the hot and smart ladies reading this have some thoughts on Mr. Law School's advice?

And guys out there - what sort of study partners do you plan to pick? Will you do what Mr. Law School suggests?

***

Read some Law School Diaries for other takes on the law school experience.

Photo of Tina Fey via Wikimedia Commons

LSAT Diary: Prep and Studying During College

LSAT Blog Prep Studying During CollegeThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Katherine, a college student in Colorado.

In this diary, she balances her LSAT prep with college and a variety of distractions, and she begins to get used to taking sections under timed conditions.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please email me at LSATUnplugged@gmail.com. (You can be in LSAT Diaries whether you've taken the exam already or not.)

Please leave her some encouragement below in the comments!

Katherine's LSAT Diary:

Day 1

Well, Day 1 was technically several months ago when I started my LSAT prep course, but this is Day 1, take two. Which really should’ve been last Thursday. A little background, I go to a “unique” school – we operate on the block plan, meaning that we take a semester worth of class in 3.5 weeks (they’d transfer out at 4 hrs and we take 4 a semester) and then get a glorious 4.5 day weekend before starting our next block.

I was supposed to kick back my LSAT studying that day, but I decided going to New Mexico would be more fun – and it definitely was. I took the equivalent of a practice test over the weekend and scored a 156. Oops (although, I’m reassured that even taking a test with blaring pop music on the radio and in a moving car I don’t score in the 140s). I’ve focused my studying more on sections – why?

Time isn’t an issue for me. I scored a 160 on my first practice and by my third was scoring a 165. I know where I need to improve and I know what sections I’m capable of acing (scored nearly perfectly on my first RC section, haven’t replicated that since). I also know I need to rise at least 5 more points – which seems like such a doable amount that I’m worried I’m going to have trouble motivating myself.

So day one, which was also day one of my second block - I woke up at 5:30 am to make a 6 am yoga class. Showered, went to breakfast at 7:30 and did a logic games section until the cafeteria got too noisy. Haven’t checked out how I did, but feel pretty confident. The section only took me 25 minutes too, which is good because when I assess my mistakes I know I have a lot of extra time. Then I went to class from 9-12, had a meeting for a departmental student committee that I run, worked out some logistics for that, and went to the grocery store (which was an ordeal because I was only purchasing cupcake mix for an event I’m hosting this week).

More background on me – I’m in a sorority and my first months back at school were overwhelmed by Formal Recruitment. That was the reason I didn’t get a solid start to my studying back when I returned to school, I was constantly running errands/essentially living at our chapter lodge – I was also taking a 300 level class for my major with a difficult professor. But that’s over and I’m reasonably confident in my class performance. Now I just have one more informal recruitment event to contend with this week and after that I’m off the hook, meaning allllll LSAT alllll the time (not really).


Day 2

Woke up. Went to class. Went to yoga. Went to my sorority house to bake cupcakes for an event on Wednesday. I intended to knock out both my class reading and my practice sections, but ran into a friend at the house – talked all afternoon while baking the cupcakes instead. Then had a dinner date with a few friends that lasted over an hour. When I arrived back at my apartment I had a few hundred pages of reading and a section of the LSAT to contend with. I did a Logical Reasoning section before doing my reading and going to bed. Not the best day of studying, but a good day nonetheless.


Day 3

Class, then yoga, the usual - After yoga I sat down and finished the test – didn’t do as well as I hoped, 158 – lowest score in a while, but higher than the one from break. Interesting was that I missed questions in clumps – like 5 in a row at once, but would ace the rest of the section. This is clearly an attention problem. Time isn’t an issue – I’m finishing sections too quickly (25 minutes on average). The plan for Thursday is to go over the questions I’ve missed on the past two tests and see where I went wrong – about 4 of them was a case of second guessing my first answer and changing it, clearly won’t be doing that anymore.

Was happy with my logic games section – it wasn’t near perfect, but I aced two of the four games and then did well enough on the others. I was worried I’d be out of practice. I still need to work on RC, its frustrating because I know I’m capable of acing that section (on my first practice ever I only missed one question) but I haven’t been able to tap into the necessary focus when studying. I think Friday I’m going to attempt to take a timed practice test – actually force myself to use 35 minutes per section to go back. For now I need to do some homework before my event tonight.


Day 4

So today was the first day in a few weeks where I haven’t had a meeting or an event to prepare for/attend. So obviously I was productive… except not. I got out of class around 11:30 (half an hour early), which threw off my plan to go to yoga at 2 – so I went at 12:30 instead. When I got back to my apartment, I had a plan in mind – facebook some photos, review my answers on a few PrepTests, but instead I decided to paint my nails and watch a documentary on crosswords (Wordplay, check it out!). I also did some research on the LSAC website and LSAT Blog so the time wasn’t completely wasted.

From 5-9PM I went over my tests and reworked logic games (took an hour break to watch The Office and 30 Rock). As I suspected, my problems were from points where I was either distracted [in a car, not focused because I wanted to do something else] or out of laziness. Six of the questions I missed on one test were due to not sticking with my first answer. While I’m still annoyed with the 158, I see some easy ways to improve. One is to make myself use the full 35 minutes for each section – even if I’m just sitting at my desk until the time is up. I’m finishing sections in 25-27 minutes (I track it while I take the test), which is great, but I’m clearly rushing/not as focused.

Tomorrow I’m planning on taking a timed test – I’ll be doing 5 sections, I’m not going to do the essay, but I am going to throw in an experimental section (probably a second logic games section just to screw with me/get more practice). I think this week has been a good way to test the waters and tomorrow’s practice test will hopefully boost my confidence and help me refocus.

Then, it's homecoming weekend, so while I know I should be going out in moderation to maximize my studying, the LSAT is still 9 weeks away so I’m going to take advantage of the festivities. Planning on taking my test and partying my way through the rugby game and the evening. Now I just have a ton of reading to contend with, but hopefully I’ll finish at a reasonable hour so I can get a goodnight sleep and have an effective practice test!


Day 5

General day, class then yoga – no variation, clearly I like a routine! Headed to the library around 2:45 to take my first timed practice test since July – scored a 162, respectable, comforting, but nowhere near what I feel I’m capable of. I did five sections – threw in the logic games section another test during my 4th section, meaning I did LR, RC, LG, LG, LR. Took the test with the LSAT proctor MP3 - in the background, between that and the noise of the ventilation system of the library, it was a good amount of distraction to contend with. Will definitely use it again.

Did reasonably well on my LG within the test – only missed two, which is unheard of for me, especially as I struggled with the games while taking the test. On my LG section, I had an easier time with 3 of the 4 games, missing only 4 questions from all of those – but one of the games was unlike any I had encountered and I bombed it (which I was expecting when I was trying to work it). Will be reviewing that game a few times! Otherwise my weakest point was during the final section of LR – I missed 6 in a row! So while I missed 15 of those questions overall, 9 were in the 4th section.

I attribute this to test fatigue and falling prey to the LR tricks! On about half of my incorrect answers, I got it down to the correct answer and the one I ultimately decided on – meaning that if I study those and improve on my mistakes I can maybe take my LR down to only missing 7 or 8 questions total, which would bump up my score. RC was decent, not what I’m capable of I missed at least 1 question a passage, two on two of them. That can be improved – I just need to practice more.

This practice is exactly what I needed to restore my confidence, but force me to get my butt back in gear on studying. This week was a good start – 9 weeks out from the LSAT, plenty of time to improve to the score I know I can achieve. Well it's now 6 on a Friday afternoon and I’ve just missed one of the most beautiful days I’ve seen in a while, but that’s alright because now I can enjoy Homecoming weekend and take Saturday (and potentially Sunday) off from studying!


Day 6

Woke up at 5:30, went to yoga sculpt at 6. Mondays are busy - I have a sorority meeting and I lead a meeting of a departmental student committee, so if I don’t hit up the morning class, I generally can’t fit in a yoga class. I decided to take my practice book to the dining hall and do a section because I need to practice working with the distractions. This decision turned out to be a mistake as the first section was Reading Comprehension. I didn’t do well - I know Steve cautions against sleep inertia, but I thought after a cardio yoga class, the walk from campus to the studio, and a cold shower, I’d be awake enough to focus.

Right now I’m feeling a little defeated by RC. I don’t want to fear or hate this section, but its frustrating me to know end right now – I know I’m capable of acing it, but I haven’t been able to replicate that in awhile and my RC score is getting steadily weaker. It’s such an easy section to pick up points, so every time I miss questions I just picture my score dropping.

My weakest points are the science passages – I think one of my goals starting this week will be to read at least 4 dense science articles a week and attempt to understand them. I also think I’m going to make copies of RC sections from different tests before I mark up my book and force myself to practice ont hose sections repeatedly – I know its not always beneficial to rework passages I’ve already read, but I need more sections to practice. I'll be home for a weekend in around 3 weeks, so I’m going to bring my other two books back then.

I think using earlier LSATs as supplemental practice will give me a confidence boost that I can hopefully translate into a mental edge, but I’m still going to use the later PrepTests as my primary study sources. When I make mistakes on the other sections, it’s generally due to a lapse in focus. Since I did that section this morning – my goal for the afternoon/evening will be to review Friday’s practice test – especially that circular logic game.


Day 7

Another mediocre practice section – this time Logical Reasoning. Maybe we're just not meshing? Am going to try and do the last two sections tomorrow, study on Thursday, practice test Friday. Not going to let this discourage me too much.


Day 8

Made another attempt at morning practice – got up at 5:30 for 6am yoga. Did a Logic Games section after breakfast. Not a great showing. Spent another half hour going over yesterday's LR section and the LG game section I just did. Realized I made some fairly careless mistakes. I’ve been feeling pretty tired this week so that’s probably not helping. My normally 3-hour class lasted for 5 hours and then I went to meet with a professor to discuss political science events and programming for the school year. Had another meeting tonight so I couldn’t work then. Am aiming to finish the final section, start a paper, and review my mistakes on past exams.


Day 9

Soundly defeated by another PrepTest, lowest score ever. Its been a weird week and I’ve been distracted by personal issues. Not going to dwell on it. Going to get a good night's sleep tonight and have a great practice test tomorrow.


Logic and Games

* Would you rather go to a traditional law school or a new-agey interdiscplinary one? [WSJ Law Blog]

* UVA Law beer pong party features Confederate flag table. [Above The Law]

* Corrupt police department literally makes ticketing into a game for one town's cops. [Gawker]

* Blue whales should all have cancer, but they don't. Maybe they can help us. [Discover]

* NYC councilman wants to register bikes as if they were cars. I preferred the 2008 congestion pricing plan. [Village Voice]

* Does the world's most persistent/stupid bank robber get away? [YouTube]

* Westboro Baptist Church wins Supreme Court free speech case. [Huffington Post]