Getting ready for the LSAT? Use a day-by-day study plan to stay on track.

Save time by instantly downloading LSAT PrepTest PDFs and explanations.

September 29, 2011

October 2011 LSAT Score Release Dates

LSAT Blog October LSAT Score Release DatesGood luck to everyone taking the October LSAT!

The October LSAT scores / results are scheduled to be released via email by Wednesday, October 26, 2011. However, the scores usually come back a bit earlier.

Let's look at the trend over the past several years (click below chart to enlarge):





LSAT Blog October LSAT Score Release Dates

Just as with the June 2011 LSAT, LSAC is giving themselves a few extra days (as compared to previous years) to calculate the scores.

For the June 2011 LSAT, LSAC said they'd have the scores back within 23 days, rather than the typical 21. However, June 2011 LSAT scores came back 2 days ahead of schedule - the Monday before the scheduled release date.

Now, for the October 2011 LSAT, LSAC says they'll have the scores back within 25 days, rather than the typical 23. For this reason, given the information we have about the actual June 2011 LSAT score release date, my best guess is that October 2011 LSAT scores will be released on Monday, October 24th.

When do you think they'll come back?

***

"But at what time specifically? I need to know when to constantly refresh my email / LSAC account!"

In batches over the course of several hours. Likely starting late in the day (Eastern Time).

No one knows how the batches are organized, if at all.

The batches do not seem to be organized in any of these ways:

alphabetical/regional/high-to-low scores/low-to-high scores/test center #, etc.

Wish everyone all the best!

***

Also see other LSAT score release dates posts.

***

While you're waiting for your score, get busy with my admissions-related blog posts.

Also see, Should You to Cancel Your LSAT Score?

Feel free to leave comments and vent at the injustice of having to wait so long for what is rightfully yours.

Continue Reading...»

October 2011 LSAT Curve: PrepTest 64

LSAT Blog October 2011 LSAT Curve PrepTest 64UPDATE: The curve for the October 2011 LSAT: PrepTest 64 is now available.

***

The "curve" on the October 2010 exam was pretty generous. It allowed 12 incorrect answers to get a 170. (The average for September/October exams in recent years was only 10.25 incorrect answers).

The below chart contains recent data regarding the number of questions you could get wrong on recent exams and still achieve a particular scaled score (out of 180):

LSAT Blog December Curve Comparison Averages 2002-2009







This continues the trend of relatively generous curves in the most recent exams.

(See what it's taken to get an LSAT score of 160 or 170 on every released LSAT PrepTest.)

Come back after you take the LSAT and post your curve predictions in the comments!

Photo by blprnt_van
Continue Reading...»

LSAT Diary: Strategies and Test Day Prep

LSAT Strategies Test Day PrepThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Brad, who followed my 3-month LSAT study schedule and scored a 179!

He's got tons of LSAT advice for you about how he did it.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please fill out this survey. (You can be in LSAT Diaries whether you've taken the exam already or not.)

Thanks to Brad for sharing his experience and advice, and please leave your questions for him below in the comments!

Brad's LSAT Diary:

By the time I had made the decision to apply to law school, I realized that I had a bit of an uphill battle. My first year in college was horrendous, and had a large impact on my GPA. The following 3.5 years were much better and I graduated with a major GPA of 3.6, but a cumulative of 3.16. With a desire to attend a T14 school, I knew that the LSAT would be an incredibly important part of my application, and would possibly make or break my admission. I decided to devote myself entirely to the LSAT. When the results came in, I knew that I had made the right decision.

With that, my first words of wisdom to anyone reading this is to sit down, think long and hard about this test, and make the decision. If you are just starting to kick around the idea of taking the test, and the next administration is in 2 months, I would advise holding out a few more months. If you are set on taking the next administration, know what grit and commitment it requires. This test may in the long run have the largest effect on your future of any test in your life.

The test is not unbeatable, but you have to show a total commitment to beating it. I recently ran into an old acquaintance who told me that he had also taken the LSAT, but shortly before the test started seeing a new lady friend, and thus didn't devote any time to studying logic games. As you can imagine, he was not quite happy with his score.

I originally planned on taking the test earlier, but due to outside circumstances, work, etc. was not comfortable with the amount of studying I had achieved and put it off until June. I did some intermittent studying in the months leading up to and shortly thereafter Feb. but with about three months until the June administration, cleared everything that I could from my schedule and made the LSAT my number one priority. I felt lost, and a bit overwhelmed. I was doing early LSAT PrepTests, but my scores were erratic.

I stumbled across LSAT Blog, read through absolutely everything on the site that I could, and decided that his three month study plan was the best for me. Of all of the information that I found on various blogs and message boards, nothing seemed as comprehensive and structured as Steve's LSAT study plans. I cleared off my large desk calendar and wrote down everything that I needed to do, day by day, over the 3 months. I was about a week and a half behind when I got started, so the day by day breakdown allowed me to condense Steve's schedule a bit, and stay on track. Having a day by day guide kept my studying structured, and forced me to face when I was falling behind, and catch up.

I found both of the LSAT Bibles (Logic Games, Logical Reasoning, reviews) to be helpful, but much like the actual Bible, not to be followed to the word. Remember, the point of the study strategies, and of the studying in general is to find something that works for you. By the time you enter the testing center, you should recognize patterns, know there will almost undoubtedly be a question about unemployment rates, and have a good idea as to exactly what 35 minutes feels like. For those three months, I lived and breathed the LSAT.

One of the most important aspects of my studying was pinning down the variations of my mental state during each PrepTest. I'll write a bit more about state of mind when talking about test day, but for the prep work, I cannot stress its importance. I understand that everyone has to study when they can and how they can, but try to make the environment as realistic as possible. That means turning off the tv and the stereo, getting off the couch, and pretending every time that you put pencil to paper, that you are taking a test. I took my comfortable office chair out of the office, and used a kitchen chair.

When I was studying, I didn't smoke, didn't eat, didn't listen to music and turned off my phone. When doing a PrepTest, I used the online LSAT timer so that come test day I wouldn't be surprised to hear someone interrupt my train of thought by saying "5 minutes remaining in this section." (Sounds silly, I know, but the first time I used it I nearly jumped out of my chair I was so thrown off by a sudden interruption.)

On my two days off a week, after my morning routine, I would take a full PrepTest. I began adding on a fifth, and for endurance occasionally a sixth section. I would then take an afternoon break, and return to dissect the test. I began with writing down each problem that I answered wrong, and what type of problem it was so that I knew my weak spots. I would then go through any question that I answered wrong and any question that I answered correctly but had trouble with. For every question that I answered incorrectly I would dissect the question and explain why the right answer was right and the others not. It was through this very time consuming process that I noticed the greatest jump in my score. When I truly understood why a question was wrong, I would be much less likely to repeat a mistake.

My scores consistently hovered around 176 with two important happenings. At first, I realized I was dissecting the questions to an almost absurd degree while testing, so I needed to take a step back, and trust my gut a bit. The other was that the title of one of Steve's posts became my mantra of sorts. "How I learned to stop worrying and love the LSAT." I was at my absolute best when I viewed the test not as a source of frustration, but a puzzle, a code to crack, or a game. I cannot guess how many times I repeated those words to myself.

When I signed up for the testing center, being in a major city, I had my choice between a number of locations. I picked the most expensive private university in the list and am very happy I did. I ended up in a law classroom at Northwestern, a top 14 school with very comfortable amenities, as opposed to my undergrad school which was notorious for terrible classrooms with odd smells, awful florescent lighting, and a number of confusing noises.

So finally, leading up to test day, I took the two days before the test off of work to focus, and most importantly to relax. I did activities during the day that were not test-related, and wouldn't tire me out, ensuring a good night's sleep. I woke up the morning of the test, with my ziplock bag already packed, went through my normal morning routine, and headed out the door. I arrived at the testing center over an hour early, just to insure that time would not add to my already existing nerves. I brought with me 1 Logic Game, 1 Reading Comp passage, and two pages of Logical Reasoning.

I found a secluded spot, and sat down to relax, calm my nerves, and do a few prep questions. I did not score my questions that morning, as I didn't need to shake my confidence with a few wrong answers immediately before heading into the test. One of the other important mental games was also mentioned by Danielle in her LSAT Diary. I ignored that other people were there to take the test, I didn't need to feel someone else's nerves, or let their casual attitude make me feel unprepared for being so nervous. Make the test about you, and simply focus on you and the test.

Seeing as people seem to be drawn to sports analogies in things like this, what's one more? I remembered watching basketball as a kid, specifically Reggie Miller at the free throw line, and was amazed that someone could be so intently focused with 35,000 screaming fans and millions more watching around the country. In taking the test, I tried to achieve a similar state of zen if you will. When I sat down at the table, I knew that I had done everything I could to prepare. Early mornings, late nights, 8-10 hour days of studying and test taking left me knowing every corner of that exam. When the time came, and the proctor told us to open our books, much like I imagine Reggie Miller did, I stopped thinking about the test, took a deep breath, and simply started to do the test.

Without the full support of my family, friends, and girlfriend, I would not have been able to achieve what I have. They simply had to understand that for three months, barring important obligations, I was off the grid. If that meant that on our one day off together, my girlfriend knew that I would disappear to the office for the majority of the day, that was the sacrifice I had to make, and luckily the sacrifice she was willing to make. It was a rough three months indeed, but I can say without a shred of doubt, absolutely worth it. I jumped 12 points from my first cold test to test day, and hopefully anyone reading this will realize that with the right preparation and resources, a few months of dedication can make a world of difference.

Continue Reading...»

Logic and Games

* The October LSAT is almost upon us! Check out these LSAT Test Day Tips. [LSAT Blog]

* This law student donated sperm several times to pay for school, and he may now have over 100 biological children. [Above The Law]

* This 16-year-old just started law school and wants to become a defense attorney. No word yet on how he's paying for it. [News Observer]

* A judge in Minnesota approved the serving of divorce papers via email, Facebook, and MySpace. [ABA Journal]

* The NYTimes implies that people around the world are sick of democracy and want the Internet as a model for participation in government. [NYTimes]


Continue Reading...»

September 22, 2011

Can You Bring Your Cell Phone To The LSAT?

LSAT Blog Cell Phones Not AllowedNo.

This is a reminder that LSAC does not permit cell phones at the test center.

The rules require that you leave them at home.

Take another look at the LSAT test day tips for more on what you can and can't bring.

I'm just guessing here, but I think the cell phone ban might stem from a 12-year-old LSAT cheating scandal - back when people actually used pagers:
The Law School Admission Council, the official administrator of the Law School Admission Test, or LSAT, became intimately aware of the threat in 1997, when a University of Southern California test taker ran out of the exam room with his test book. A proctor chased him, but couldn't stop him from hopping into a getaway car.

Hours later, the thief sent the LSAT answers to two test takers at the University of Hawaii at Manoa -- where the test was just commencing -- via electronic pager. The proctor became suspicious when she noticed the test takers frequently looking at their pagers. She let them finish their exams, then contacted the LSAC, which turned the case over to the Los Angeles Police Department.

All three students were prosecuted in California Superior Court on charges of conspiracy to commit robbery. They were sentenced to a year in jail each and forced to pay $97,000 in restitution to the LSAC.

The LSAC retains experts in electronic surveillance equipment from Securitas Security Services USA Inc. to provide staff to administer tests, carry out security investigations and alert testing companies of the latest cheating gadgetry and trends.

But, for now, it doesn't use electronic detection devices. Jim Vaseleck, executive assistant to the president of the LSAC, notes that astute proctors, not gadgets, foiled the USC plot.

"We instruct test takers and train proctors that folks are not allowed to bring electronic devices into testing centers," he says.

Plus, he believes that low-tech cheating schemes, which can be combated only with astute proctors, remain a bigger problem. He notes incidents where test takers carved exam answers into No. 2 pencils, selling them on the black market for close to $1,000, or lined up different-colored M&Ms on a desk to correspond to answers of multiple- choice questions. "Electronic devices present more of a nuisance than a security problem," Mr. Vaseleck says.

(article from Wisconsin School of Journalism website - link down- http://www.journalism.wisc.edu/crediteducation/WSJ%20art.htm)
I hope that LSAC learned its lesson and hires more physically-fit proctors these days.

Either way, the bottom line: don't cheat.

Photo by ewige
Continue Reading...»

Law School: The Socratic Method

LSAT Blog Law School The Socratic MethodThe below excerpt about the Socratic method is from Professor David Hricik's Law School Basics.

The Socratic Method

Law school classes are not taught like undergraduate courses. Instead of simply listening to a lecture and taking notes, law school classes—particularly most first-year classes—are taught using the so-called “Socratic method.” In the Socratic method, the professor teaches not by lecturing, but by engaging in a dialogue with one or more students in the class. The teacher may often stay with one student for the entire class period. It can be stressful, and some professors enjoy showing off their intellect at the expense of their students.

Professors who use the Socratic method teach by asking questions based upon hypothetical fact patterns slightly different from the cases that were assigned as reading. The professor will see how far the rule from the case can be stretched: when should a different result be reached, or a different rule applied?

For instance, suppose in the assigned case the court had reasoned that a person’s trespass across somebody else’s property was unlawful, even though the person did not know he was trespassing. The professor may ask: “Suppose he was trespassing across someone’s land in order to rush another person to the hospital?”

The professor wants to test the limits of the “rule” from the case and the student’s ability to think on his or her feet. Does the case really mean that all trespasses are always illegal; that is what the court said that it “held”; but can’t some trespasses be “justified” or “excused?” If so, what rules or tests should be used to determine whether such an exception should apply—whether someone should not be held liable for trespass even though he went onto another’s land without permission. The Socratic method is used to explore the factual, logical, and policy boundaries of legal rules as stated by the cases.

The Socratic teaching method is less widely used in law schools than it was in the past, particularly after the first-year classes. Whether that is good or bad as a pedagogical matter is an open question. From personal experience, however, I can say that knowing you will not be grilled about the assigned reading makes it easier to go to classes during your third year, when often you are too detached to care about being prepared for class.

Another common feature of most law schools is that you will have only one test in each class, a final, given at the end of the semester. In some year-long classes, you will have only one test at the end of the school year. Unlike undergraduate courses, your grade for each law course will depend entirely upon how well you do on one test. (Legal writing classes are different because an evaluation of writing ability is not best based on one sample, and so grades in legal writing are based upon several assignments turned in over the semester.)

Thus, except for legal writing, during your first year your daily routine will consist of reading cases and other materials, such as law review articles, and showing up for class to discuss them by the Socratic method. Unlike your typical undergraduate experience, during your entire law school career you will rarely turn in any paper or other assignments. There will only be one final in each class. That one test will determine your grade for the entire, semester-long course, or in some cases, for the entire year-long course. During your first year, this routine will be punctuated every four to six weeks by the need to turn in an assignment in your legal writing class.

Photo by wallyg
Continue Reading...»

Law School Basics Ebook PDF

LSAT Blog Law School Basics Ebook PDFThe vast majority of content here on LSAT Blog is, unsurprisingly, about the LSAT.

However, plain common sense tells me that just about all of you are considering law school.

As such, I've made Law School Basics: A Preview of Law School and Legal Reasoning by Professor David Hricik available for instant PDF download.

(I've also published an excerpt from it covering the Socratic method, as well as an excerpt about law school case briefs.}

The table of contents includes:

-An Overview of Law School
-The United States Legal System
-The Common Law Reasoning Process
-Why Law School Is Structured Like It Is
-The Legal Research Process
-Hints for Better Legal Research
-Legal Writing: How Lawyers Write About Cases
-Writing Hints

***

At the moment, this 203-page guide to law school is only $9.97.

Here's a description of the book directly from the publisher:
Law school has the reputation of being one of the hardest academic programs. It is a reputation well earned. However, Law School Basics is chock-full of insights and strategies that will prepare you well and give you a head start on the competition.

Law School Basics presents a thorough overview of law school, legal reasoning, and legal writing. It was written for those who are considering law school; for those who are about to start law school; and for those who are interested in knowing more about lawyering and the legal process.

Law School Basics was written with one overriding goal: to enlighten you about everything the author wishes he had known before starting law school.
***

Please note:

-This is a PDF available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader at http://get.adobe.com/reader/ and ensure that your copy of this software is up to date.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-You don't need a PayPal account to complete your purchase. If you don't have one, simply select the "guest checkout" option.

-Due to the nature of digital downloads, LSAT Blog cannot offer any refunds. All sales are final.


Continue Reading...»

LSAT Diary: Finding Time to Study For The LSAT In College

LSAT Blog Finding Time Study LSAT CollegeThis installment of LSAT Diaries comes from Chris, a 24-year-old recent college graduate.

In this LSAT Diary, he talks about the struggles involved in finding time to study for the LSAT while taking his college classes.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please fill out this survey.

Please leave Chris some encouragement below in the comments!

Chris's LSAT Diary:

Here I am (somewhat) fresh out of college and at the nexus of determining the next step in my academic career: the LSAT.

For the better part of six years, I have entertained the dream that I could command my way into a top law school if I worked hard enough. It all started when I was a party in an unfortunate personal injury case involving a hit-and-run driver. An accomplished attorney grilled me for three days straight and it was one of the most stressful experiences I had ever encountered at that time. Yet, during my courtroom experience, I noticed that lawyers were just mere mortals and I became fascinated with the mechanics and components of practicing the law. I said to myself, "This is cool. I could do something like that." After wrapping up the trial, I flung myself back into the daily grind of college (lectures, homework and work) with a renewed confidence.

For the next four years, I challenged myself to perform at the highest possible level that I could. My academic goal was to get straight As throughout my undergraduate career and to put in the necessary time to make that happen. It wasn't easy, but I survived each day with a lot of diligence, persistence and support from friends, family and teachers. As time went by, I focused primarily on school and working full-time as a Resident Assistant. Being on call 24 hours a day didn't exactly leave me much time to study for the LSAT before I graduated. School and work ate up most of my weekdays and weekends. Taking breaks for myself required the rest of my time.

After coming to the gripping realization that my 4.0+ UGPA isn't automatically going to translate into an elite score, I enrolled in several classes that built fundamental LSAT skills, like critical reasoning. Before I knew it, it was time to graduate, and the LSAT was the last hurdle that I would have to complete before I could go to all those dream schools whose allure captivated me during my spring break trips. I planned on studying the entire summer, which I thought would be brimming with free time. If you sprinkled in a few personal crises, family troubles and post-grad anxiety, then you would have recreated the situation that my idealistic study period turned into.

I have read a variety of books (the best being A Rulebook for Arguments and How to Think Logically), pored over countless LSAT Blog posts, taken a lot of PrepTests, and brutally dissected myself based on their results. While that sort of mentally taxing experience is never easy to deal with, I'm having fun. I'm excited to finally take the test and not have it take a hold of nearly every conversation I have with someone when he or she asks, "What are your plans for after college?" If I don't do well, then I'll just regroup and prepare again (hopefully with fewer distractions).

The most important thing that I have learned is that we all make mistakes and we deal with the consequences. Buying into the mindset that taking the LSAT only once and doing well is the only way you're ever going to make it as a successful lawyer isn't going to help you. Sure, your application might be dinged somewhat if your scores are averaged, but the ABA only requires law schools to report a student's highest score.

Also, there is a popular tendency among individuals, especially stressed-out students, to champion fear-based memes for public consumption on the Internet whenever the LSAT is mentioned. In my opinion, that's all nonsense. To all those people who are prepping with me or are going to study in the near future, I hope that you'll just put the time in to understand the test and stay positive. In turn, you'll likely learn more about yourself. As for me, I'm just enjoying the process.

Photo by Paul Watson
Continue Reading...»

Logic and Games

* More LSAT Test Day Tips than you could ever possibly want. [LSAT Blog]

* An analysis of law schools behaving badly - in fudging their students' LSAT scores and GPAs. [National Law Journal]

* Fordham Law School ends farm share program - a case study in red tape. [NYTimes]

* Kennedy Fried Chicken restaurants may be committing trademark infringement - against the original Kennedy Fried Chicken. [NYTimes]

* A webcomic rendition of the Netflix streaming / DVD split. [The Oatmeal]

* A brief history of the emoticon. [Mashable]

* A film entitled "This Is Not A Film" was shot on an iPhone and snuck out of Iran in a cake. [Huffington Post]

Continue Reading...»

September 15, 2011

Law School Personal Statement Topics: Interview

Law School Personal Statement Topics: InterviewI recently interviewed Stefanie Arr of The Advanced Edit via email.

(Also see our other interview about burnout, diversity statements, and addenda.)

Our discussion follows.

***

1. How can someone write an impressive personal statement if they haven't ever *done* anything impressive? After all, not everyone applying to law school has founded NGOs to save orphans from smallpox.

I always warn my students of falling into that death trap of “Oh no, I didn’t volunteer/start up a business/end world hunger, what do I do?!” It’s a terrible thing to start doubting your abilities and accomplishments just before writing an essay where you have to showcase them. Personal statements are not about what impressive things you've done as much as they are about how impressive you are, as a person-- specifically, a mature person going on to an advanced degree. This is seen mainly through effective writing skills; even the most altruistic feats come off as boring and uninspiring if written about poorly or without good argument structure. Law school as an institution exists to train students to become persuasive and effective writers, and any lawyer worth his/her/its salt has to good at persuading people. So, admissions counselors want to see promise of that in each applicant.


2. Applicant after applicant will write personal statements stating their reasons for wanting to go to law school. How can each one of our dear readers write a compelling essay on this topic that will stand out to admissions committees?

If your wonderful readers choose to write a “Why Law School” essay, they should focus on tailoring it specifically to themselves, not to what they feel admissions counselors want to hear. A common mistake is to write an essay thinking that admissions counselors want to read about why law school will help an applicant end global warming, develop his/her own corporate empire, or fulfill the family legacy of lawyering. A “Why Law School” essay should provide realistic reasons why you should go to law school, and explain why your own qualities and experiences make this a natural choice. So, it’s less “Why law school would be a good idea” and more “Why I want to go to law school and how my background and abilities make it a great fit for me.”


3. How much time should one spend revising a personal statement, and how can one tell when it's *finished*?

It’s impossible to set a firm amount of time and have that work for everyone. Everyone works at different speeds and everyone has different amounts of free time available to them. So, whether it’s one month or an entire application cycle (about four to five months), one has to allot enough time to write multiple drafts and to revise and review appropriately. It’s also important to be honest with yourself about how much time you actually have, and to be realistic with your goals. Rushing should NEVER be an option.

You’re done with your essay when you’ve exhausted your own resources-- when you feel like you can’t possibly add or edit anymore! This is when giving your essay over to someone for review may be a good idea. Yes, applicants do give me their essays to review, but a professor or trusted colleague can help as well. You are your own worst critic and own worst slave-driver so, sometimes, someone else has to tell you to step away from your computer. And, usually, they’re right.


4. Anything else?

It’s important to note that the personal statement is the ONLY chance for admissions counselors to get to know you. Yes, hard factors (like the LSAT...ahem) are critical and often deciding elements, but your statement has significant sway. Your essay is also the only part of your application that you have complete and utter control over. So, don’t squander it, but don’t lose sight of what it’s about, either.


***

Stefanie Arr is a professional writing tutor and editor based in New York City. She has nearly a decade of publishing and editing experience and offers expert, in-depth editing and revision services. She can help you develop and improve the skills necessary to deliver a clear, finished product, including brainstorming and paper organization, grammar and syntax mechanics, academic research, argument structure, style, and draft revision.

Photo by bobaubuchon
Continue Reading...»

LSAT Practice: Games and Reasoning Workbook

LSAT Blog Practice Games Reasoning WorkbookWhether you've finally run out of actual LSAT PrepTests, or you just want to review the basics as Test Day approaches, there's a new book for you: LSAT Practice: Games and Reasoning Workbook. It's now available for instant PDF download.

You may need some more practice, or you may just want some drills and exercises to help you reinforce the strategies you've learned.

Fortunately, fellow LSAT tutor Jesse wrote this workbook to test your understanding of basic LSAT concepts for the Logic Games and Logical Reasoning sections, and to help you to review strategies and approaches for each.

Each section of the workbook includes a general review of the topic covered and is followed by drills and exercises on that topic to test and reinforce your understanding.

***

Here are some of the topics the workbook covers:

-General approaches and strategies for Logic Games, and diagramming
-General approaches and strategies for Logical Reasoning questions
-Necessary and sufficient conditions
-The contrapositive
-Negation
-Logical quantities (some, many, most, all, and none)


***

At the moment, LSAT Practice: Games and Reasoning Workbook is only $19.97, and you get one 82-page PDF with all the exercises and reviews. This means you can print new copies of the drills and redo them for extra practice.

Enjoy!

***

Please note:

-This is a PDF available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader at http://get.adobe.com/reader/ and ensure that your copy of this software is up to date.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-Due to the nature of digital downloads, LSAT Blog cannot offer any refunds. All sales are final.



Continue Reading...»

How to Recover from LSAT Burnout

LSAT Blog Recover From LSAT BurnoutAs the LSAT approaches, you've probably started clutching your PrepTests for protection. Your friends have started to compare you to Linus from the Peanuts comic, who carries his blanket wherever he goes.

However, if you've been studying for a while, you might be sick of the LSAT by now. Your body might start to reject the LSAT like an organ transplant gone wrong.

So how do you continue to prepare when you feel like you just can't take it anymore, but the LSAT's still a couple of weeks away?

More importantly, how do you know whether your aversion to the LSAT is due to burnout or laziness? Believe it or not, people sometimes mistake one for the other.

Here are some tips to help you determine whether it's burnout or laziness, and, if it's the former, how to deal with it.


Burnout vs. Laziness

1. Average PrepTest scores drop
If your PrepTest scores have recently dropped below your average PrepTest score, it's probably burnout.

If your score was never high to begin with, it's probably laziness.


2. Careless mistakes
If most of your recent mistakes are due to carelessness, rather than a lack of understanding, it's probably burnout.

If you just make a lot of mistakes in general, it's probably laziness.


3. Studying but feel like it's going nowhere
If you've done several practice exams recently and feel like it's going nowhere, it's probably burnout.

If you haven't done anything recently and feel like you're studying's going nowhere, it's probably laziness.


4. Feel guilty for taking short breaks
If you took a break from studying for an hour and felt guilty, it's probably burnout.

If you took a break from studying for a month and felt guilty, it's probably laziness.


5. Studying 10 hours per day
If you study for 10 hours per day, it's probably burnout.

If you think about the LSAT for several hours every day, and you count those hours as actual studying, it's probably laziness. (Note: lawyers often bill for this kind of "work" too, so you'll be in good company after graduating from law school)


If you've identified your problem as laziness, read 5 Reasons to Stay Motivated During LSAT Prep.

If your problem is burnout, read on.

How to recover from LSAT burnout
You may just need a break to recharge your batteries.

The burned-out student might say, "But I can't stop studying now! The test is 2 1/2 weeks away, and I still have another 30 PrepTests to finish before then."

You may not have any brain cells remaining if you try to do that many PrepTests in such a short period of time.

The LSAT's like riding a bike. Memorization's not involved, so cramming won't work. Sure, there are some things you need to remember. However, if taking a day or two off makes you forget them, you probably didn't understand them in the first place. The LSAT is about skills and a particular mindset, not facts.

So take a day or two off and exercise, watch a TV show or two, whatever you like to do to unwind.

Then rebuild your confidence by redoing your favorite Logic Games, Logical Reasoning questions, or Reading Comprehension passages. This will help you get back in the groove and gear you up to get back on schedule.

Photo by apelad

Continue Reading...»

LSAT Test Day Length in Hours

LSAT Blog Test Day Length HoursThe LSAT is a long exam, totaling just over 4 hours from start to finish, if everything goes according to plan.

Here's how I arrived at that number:

Getting started (housekeeping stuff):
Listening to rules
Bubbling-in name and address
Filling out "Certifying Statement" in cursive (stating you won't cheat):

Total: 30 minutes


4 scored 35-minute sections:
2 Logical Reasoning
1 Logic Games
1 Reading Comprehension

Total: 140 minutes - 2 hours, 20 minutes


2 unscored 35-minute sections:
1 Experimental (could be any of the 3 scored types above and is one of the first 3 sections you'll take))
Writing Sample (taken after the 5 regular parts of the LSAT - LG, LR, and RC)

Total: 70 minutes - 1 hour, 10 minutes


Break between 3rd and 4th sections:
10-15 minutes


Altogether, this is about 4 hours and 15 minutes.

(Your mileage may vary - sometimes the proctors don't know what they're doing, can't find the booklets, etc. If this happens, you might be there much longer.)

Even if everything goes according to plan, this is still a long time, especially for smokers and other drug users.

It can be difficult to get through such a long period without a fix, especially when the first section begins at 9AM (February, September/October, and December). The June exam is the only one that begins at 1PM.

Here's LSAC's policy on bringing cigarettes, gum, nicotine patches, and coffee to the test center.

Photo by molinarius

Continue Reading...»

Logic and Games

* These LSAT Cheat Sheets won't actually help you cheat, but they'll help you so much that you won't feel like you have to. [LSAT Blog]

* University of Illinois Law School may have inflated the LSAT scores and GPAs of this year's incoming class. [Chicago Tribune, Above The Law]

* How to avoid being called on in law school. [Mr. Law School]

* Woman "punked" by stupid Toyota viral campaign sues for $10 million. [Gawker]

* How to get a complete workout with nothing but your body. [Lifehacker]

* Kodachrome photos of NYC in the 1940s. [Daily Mail]


Continue Reading...»

September 8, 2011

LSAT Reading Comprehension Explanations PDF

LSAT Blog LSAT Reading Comprehension Explanations PDFComplete Reading Comprehension Explanations for PrepTests 44-63 are now available for instant PDF download.

One of the most common requests I get from my students and blog readers is for explanations of particular LSAT questions.

Although I'll explain any question in my LSAT tutoring, there's a limit to the amount I have time to write down.

Fortunately, I just learned that fellow LSAT tutor Yoni has written complete explanations for every Reading Comprehension question in PrepTests 44-63 (October 2004 LSAT - June 2011 LSAT). Not only do these explanations demonstrate the most efficient method to quickly arrive at the correct answers, but they also explain why each wrong answer choice is wrong.

***

At the moment, Complete Reading Comprehension Explanations for PrepTests 44-63 is only $44.97. That's less than $2.25 per RC section explained and less than 57 cents per passage explained, and you get one 274-page PDF with all the explanations.


***

Alternatively, if you don't plan to get some of the exams from PrepTest 44-63, you may instead purchase a smaller bundle of explanations:

-the Complete Reading Comprehension Explanations for PrepTests 44-51 (114 pages) is only $19.97

-the Complete Reading Comprehension Explanations for PrepTests 52-63 (162 pages) is only $29.97

Enjoy!


***

You can download Yoni's Complete Reading Comprehension Explanations for the free June 2007 LSAT PrepTest's Reading Comprehension section (PDF) to see what they're like. Download the June 2007 LSAT PrepTest (PDF) to follow along.

***

Please note:

-In order to benefit from this, you must separately get the Reading Comprehension questions contained within LSAT PrepTests 44-63 (October 2004 LSAT - June 2011 LSAT). This download does not include the actual LSAT Reading Comprehension questions from these exams.


-These are PDFs available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal. You can use Adobe Reader to open the files.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-Due to the nature of digital downloads, LSAT Blog cannot offer any refunds. All sales are final.



Continue Reading...»

LSAT Logic Games Solutions Ebook

LSAT Blog Logic Games Solutions Ebook Complete Logic Games Explanations for PrepTests 19-28 are now available for instant PDF download.

(You can get the games themselves in 10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests, sold separately.)

One of the most common requests I get from my students and blog readers is for explanations of particular LSAT questions.

Although I'll explain any question in my LSAT tutoring, there's a limit to the amount I have time to write down.

Fortunately, I just learned that fellow LSAT tutor Graeme has written complete explanations for every Logic Games question in PrepTests 19-28 (June 1996 - June 1999). Yes, that's right - detailed, step-by-step explanations for all 40 Logic Games in LSAT PrepTests 19-28 are now available.

These explanations include complete setups with diagrams for each game, along with explanations for how to solve every single question of each game. Not only do these explanations demonstrate the most efficient method to quickly arrive at the correct answers, but they also explain why each wrong answer choice is wrong.

***

At the moment, Complete Logic Games Explanations for LSAT PrepTests 19-28 only $29.97. That's less than $3 per exam explained and less than 75 cents per game explained, and you get one 206-page PDF with all the explanations.

Enjoy!

***

For free, you can download the explanations for the 1st Logic Games section of PrepTest 19 (June 1996 LSAT) (PDF) to see what they're like.

***

Please note:

-In order to benefit from this, you must separately get the games contained within LSAT PrepTests 19-28 (10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests) - the LSAT exams from June 1996 - June 1999. This download does not include the actual LSAT Logic Games from PrepTests 19-28.

-This is a PDF available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-These are PDFs available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal. You can use Adobe Reader to open the files.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-Due to the nature of digital downloads, LSAT Blog cannot offer any refunds. All sales are final.



Continue Reading...»

Preparing for the October 2011 LSAT Experimental Section

LSAT Blog October 2011 LSAT Experimental SectionDid you take the October 2011 LSAT? Check out previous October LSAT score release dates and predict the curve!

***

In my LSAT study schedules, I recommend that you include extra sections in your practice exams. Why would I recommend such a cruel and difficult task?

Because LSAC uses test-takers as lab rats (like many organizations that administer standardized exams - think back to the SAT). LSAC includes an unscored experimental section on the LSAT and doesn't tell you which one it is. If you knew which one it was, you'd probably take a nap to recuperate between the sections you care about - the scored ones.

To LSAC's credit, this practice increases the validity of the scored sections of future LSATs. The experimental section allows LSAC to pre-test questions with several thousand applicants, helping LSAC determine which questions deserve to make it into future scored sections.

On the other hand, not knowing which section is the experimental can make it difficult to decide whether or not to cancel your score. If you bomb the experimental section, it may affect your performance on the other sections. Additionally, being forced to "donate" 35 minutes of free research for LSAC after paying to take the LSAT hardly seems fair.

Regardless, because you'll see a 5-section exam on test day, rather than the 4 you're used to seeing in your LSAT PrepTests, it's essential to prepare.

I decided to write this post after blog reader Katie wrote to me with the following question:
I have been taking 4 section timed tests for a while now but am starting to take 5 and 6 section timed tests as you suggest. I have two questions:

1. I assume that the type of "extra" section(s) I include should vary from test to test. For example, on one day, I would add a logic games section and the next day either a reading comprehension or a logical reasoning section. Is this what you would recommend?

2. What is the best way to score these tests? Which section do I omit? I took a test last night and did an extra logical reasoning section. The scoring for the test I took the extra section from was very different from the full test I was taking - does this make sense? I want to make sure I'm getting an accurate read of my performance.

Varying extra sections
There are two main approaches I'd recommend:

-You can rotate the type of "extra" section(s) that you use.
-You can make the extra section(s) the one that you like the least.

For most people, a combination of the two is probably ideal. Figure out which type of section you dread the most, and include it more often than the others.


Which section to omit
This makes perfect sense, Katie. To get the most accurate score reading, omit the section(s) that are not from the original exam. Different exams have different scales.


Some more tips on preparing for the experimental section:

Where to place the unscored section.
Place at least one of the experimental sections in the first 3 sections out of the 5 (or 6) in your practice exams. That's where the experimental has traditionally fallen on test day. To my knowledge, it's always been one of the first 3 sections.

It's unfortunate that you have to take the unscored section when you're less fatigued, but just remember everyone else is affected in the same way.


Mix up sections.
As I said earlier, on test day, you won't know which section is the experimental. For this reason, you may want to lay out the sections from each PrepTest beforehand. Take two from the "scored" exam and one "unscored" experimental, and mix them together.

This way, you won't know which ones are scored and which ones aren't, and you'll be forced to put the same effort into each.

Photo by happysteve
Continue Reading...»

LSAT Diary: Preparing for Test Day

LSAT Blog Preparing Test Day DiaryLSAT Blog reader Ellen has written 2 LSAT Diaries about her experience preparing for the LSAT while using my day-by-day LSAT study plan. She ended up with a 174 on the June 2011 LSAT!

This is the 2nd of a 2-part series containing her story. Here's the 1st part.

If you want to be in LSAT Diaries, please fill out this survey.

Thanks to Ellen for sharing her experience and advice, and please leave your questions for her below in the comments!

Ellen's LSAT Diary, Part 2:

Logical reasoning wasn’t nearly as dramatic. This section came extremely easily to me. I don’t think I ever got more than four problems wrong on the two sections combined, even in the beginning of my prep. I would do two or three logical reasoning days in one day because they were just so fun and came so naturally. After the games, the core concepts you need to do well in LR are really ingrained. I think this was around the time I read A Rulebook for Arguments, which I really enjoyed even though I knew most it already. I wish this were required reading in high school, since a lot of my college freshmen would have greatly benefited from reading it.

I wish I could give better advice on logical reasoning, but The Logical Reasoning Bible was stellar on that. In my head, I would just read most of the logical reasoning answers as “stupid.” Like I’d read the stimulus then as I’m reading the answers my internal monologue would be, “Stupid, stupid, slightly less stupid, really really stupid, not stupid at all! Circle E. Next question.” Sometimes I would get torn between two possibilities, and I would make my best guess and then circle the problem to go back to it once I finished the rest of the section. I always had copious extra time on this section so I could spend two or three minutes on one problem if I had to, but only after everything else was finished.

At this point I was scoring between 176-178 on tests with just the LR sections and the LG section. I was pretty happy with this because I didn’t think Reading Comprehension would be a problem for me – I was an English major and then a writing teacher, after all. I don’t think I’d gotten a reading comprehension problem wrong on any standardized test in my entire life (and my dad put me into all kinds of extra standardized tests as a child). I was basically on cloud nine at this point in my prep. And then I did a RC section.

When I was doing the first RC section, I thought it was going fine, and then I graded it and got six questions wrong. I think I wrote, “WTF” in really big letters all over the page. I looked at all the questions I got wrong, and thought that my answers were more correct than the right answers in most cases – this is when you know you have a real problem because you have to know why you’re getting questions wrong or else you can never learn how to get them right. I thought I just wasn’t annotating enough, then I thought I was going too fast, then I got into arguments with my friends about how I know better than the LSAT.

None of these things helped my RC score. I went into total panic mode for about a week. Finally, I was arguing with my boyfriend about a question about the tone of a passage. It was the one where the author is seething about modern art or something. My boyfriend finally told me that I need to stop judging the essay and picking the answer that I think is the most correct and just go with the answer that is less of a stretch and more of a given. Like if I think the author is seething, he’s probably more displeased than obstinate. He’s definitely at least displeased and maybe kind of obstinate, even if he’s closer to obstinate on the scale of displeased to obstinate. This revelation completely changed the way I approached the section and brought my wrong answers down to a more acceptable range of 1-2 (sometimes even 0!) on the RC section. Crisis averted.

At this point, I started doing full practice tests almost every day. Getting back into the mindset for games after concentrating so hard on RC was difficult at first, but games seem like going to the gym. You have to do them it at least every other if you don’t want them to be painful. I enjoy games when I get them right – kind of like I enjoy the gym when I move up to a higher weight (damn, I should be at the gym right now…). There’s really no secret to doing practice tests besides always getting a note card to transfer your answers onto so that you can compensate for the amount of time you’ll use for transferring answers onto the scantron on the day of the test. You can even rip out the scantron paper from the practice tests if you’re feeling ambitious, but you should always include that administrative time so you don’t get ambushed on test day with a lost minute.

At one point I got a 180 on a practice test and it may or may not have been one of the high points of the past year. My range was 170-180. In light of that range, I’d like to address the myth that your score will always drop 5-10 on the actual test from what you’re getting on practice tests. This is not true. If this were true 100% of the time, how would anyone ever get above a 175? As long as you don’t have a fit of some kind on test day, you can score within your range if you come into the test day with the right attitude.

I took my test at Alameda Community College near Oakland, CA, which I highly recommend given the large desks and lenient proctors. I got there about three hours early, and was more or less the first person at the test center. I recommend this because it gives you time to focus on you and your mental well-being. I sat on the ground and ate a nectarine, banana, and granola bar for breakfast/lunch. Then I did some light exercise. I also brought my favorite logic game to do in the car, which Steve recommends and I found really helpful. My favorite was the one with Olyphant, Ferrara, Gallagher, and the excavation sites in the 8th, 9th, and 10th centuries, and when I told that to another test taker he recoiled at how hard that problem was which gave me a confidence boost.

As more people started pouring into the test center, I struck up conversations with them. When you get other people talking, you start to forget about yourself and your problems. This kept me really calm and jovial. You definitely want to be the least stressed out person at the test center – you have to play this mental trick on yourself. LSAT test day is not the most important day of your life. This test you’re about to take is just like every other prep test you’ve ever taken, and by this point in your prep you should be really tired of prep tests because they’ve become so routine. I took every prep test after 19 (except for 61), and they had become old hat for me at this point (Sidenote: Taking prep tests in coffee shops is like training with weights on – do it).

Once I got into the test room, I tried to befriend the people next to me and behind me as we were waiting for the tests to be passed out, but no one was game by this point. Everyone around me was clamming up and getting really nervous, but I didn’t let it get to me. Then I took the LSAT. It was exactly like every other prep test.

I was too nervous to open the e-mail when it came so my boyfriend came home from work (It’s only a few blocks away! I’m not that needy!) and read it for me. I got a 174. My average score on the practice tests was a 175. There is no reason your score has to vary from your average by more than a point or two.

I love to talk about the LSAT, so I’m asking you to please e-mail me for any further discussion or if you’d just like a kind ear to vent to. I’m on Gmail and Gchat at ellenwcassidy.)

Finally, I’d like to get to why I even asked to write this diary at all. Steve is a fantastic person and resource for our community, and I want to give him as much good PR as I can. The mere idea that one can avoid a thousand dollar prep course with a $20 study schedule is unreal to me. Actually, the idea that more people don’t take advantage of this is unreal to me. You know you better than any half-baked Kaplan instructor ever will, and you can cater to your own needs far better than they ever will. The books Steve recommends will give you better tips and tricks than they will, and self-discipline is basically required for being a lawyer; so if you don’t have that, why are you taking the LSAT anyway? Buy an LSAT study guide and werq, girl.

Best of luck internet friends… and don’t forget that the LSAT really can be fun.

Photo by bdorfman

Continue Reading...»

Logic and Games

* Court rules that telling employees to stop talking about their dead kids is okay. [Gawker]

* Aman Ali says Muslims should stop apologizing for 9/11. [CNN]

* Israeli columnist fired for writing that Palestinian terrorism is justified. [NYTimes]

* Being a jerk in the workplace means you get paid more. [Chronicle of Higher Ed]

* Live a simpler life by being more selective in your media consumption. [Bleeding Espresso]

Continue Reading...»

September 1, 2011

LSAT Logic Games Solutions PDF

UPDATE: LSAT Blog has even more LSAT Solutions and Explanations than those listed below.

LSAT Blog Logic Games SolutionsLogic Games Explanations for LSAT PrepTests 39-51 (December 2002 LSAT - December 2006 LSAT) are now available for instant PDF download!

(You can get the exams / questions themselves in the individual LSAT PrepTests, which are sold separately.)

One of the most common requests I get from my students and blog readers is for explanations of particular LSAT questions.

Although I'll explain any question in my LSAT tutoring, there's a limit to the amount I have time to write down.

Fortunately, I just learned that fellow LSAT tutor Ping has written explanations for every Logic Game in LSAT PrepTests 39-51 (December 2002 LSAT - December 2006 LSAT).

So, altogether, that's explanations for 13 recent exams, each with 4 Logic Games per section, so you'll get explanations for all 52 Logic Games in these exams.

***

Ping has also put together a series of video explanations to accompany his written ones. You can view them for free on YouTube:

PT39: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT40: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT41: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT42: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT43: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT44: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT45: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT46: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT47: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT48: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT49: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT50: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
PT51: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4
JN07: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game 4

***

If you're concerned that all these explanations will be too heavy to carry around, keep in mind that you can print and just carry a few sections worth of explanations with you, rather than carrying the entire book at once. You can also just keep them on your computer and open the PDF as needed.


***

At the moment, Logic Games Explanations for LSAT PrepTests 39-51 only $19.97. That's less than 40 cents per game explained, and you get one 283-page PDF with all the explanations.

Enjoy!

***

You can download Ping's complete Logic Games Explanations for the free June 2007 LSAT PrepTest's Logic Games (PDF) to see what they're like. Download the June 2007 LSAT PrepTest (PDF) to follow along. The accompanying videos are linked above.

***

Please note:

-In order to benefit from these, you must separately get the Logic Games contained within LSAT PrepTests 39-51. This download does not include the actual LSAT Logic Games questions from these exams.

-The explanations assume that you already have some familiarity with the basics of Logic Games and various game-types already. They assume you're not starting from scratch with your LSAT prep.

-This is a PDF available for instant download after submitting payment via PayPal. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader at http://get.adobe.com/reader/ and ensure that your copy of this software is up to date.

-If you're already registered with PayPal, the instant download link will be sent to your PayPal email address. Otherwise, it'll be sent to whichever email address you submit.

-Due to the nature of digital downloads, LSAT Blog cannot offer any refunds. All sales are final.

Continue Reading...»

Law School Personal Statement Artist | Interview

LSAT Blog Law School Personal Statement Artist InterviewI recently interviewed Michelle Fabio, Esq. of Personal Statement Artist via email.

Our discussion follows.

***

1. Is it possible for an applicant to write a successful personal statement about why he or she wants to be a lawyer? If so, how?

The wording of this question implies that writing such a statement is a usually bad idea. I'd say that's correct, especially if it's a "save the world" theme (it's difficult for it to come off as sincere and credible -- sorry!). Also the topic is simply overdone *but* if you've had a particularly formative, recent experience that has stirred your passions for practicing law, sure, it can work.

Just about any topic can work, in fact, so long as you always focus on your "law school qualities" that you exhibited and or learned from that experience -- focus, dedication, organization skills, leadership, thoroughness, attention to detail, hard-working, etc. Regardless of your topic, those qualities should be the theme of your essay.

That said, anything such as high school or worse, elementary school, moot court and the like should be avoided at all costs. And the "my parents always told me I should be a lawyer because I like to argue?" Yeah, don't go there either.


2. What about a personal statement about a traveling experience or time abroad? If so, how?

Interesting travel experiences and/or time spent abroad can also be good topics, but again, you have to zero in on *your* qualities that you brought to and/or learned from the experience -- and usually, a very specific experience within the broader experience.

Being exposed to different cultures and languages (if you've studied abroad, for instance) as well as showing compassion for and a desire to help others (if you've volunteered abroad, for example) are certainly positive characteristics and make for an interesting, well-rounded candidate, but on their own, those experiences just aren't going to convince an adcomm that you deserve a place in the 1L class.

You really need to hammer home what a great law student you'll be as illustrated through a particular experience, whether it's traveling abroad or starting your own business -- and so we're back to those "law school qualities."

Sensing a theme here? ;)


3. What are some examples of successful "diversity statement" topics you've seen from applicants who are not traditionally classified as being racially diverse?

This is an excellent question because many applicants think only race is an appropriate topic for a diversity statement, but there are many others; now is a great time to start thinking outside of that proverbial box you'll be hearing a lot about during law school.

Some of the best diversity statements I've seen come from students who grew up in low-income homes/communities, maybe are the first to go to college in their family. I've also seen some good ones that focused on non-traditional childhoods such as being raised by grandparents because parents were out of the picture for whatever reason and even being homeschooled. Overcoming a disability is another "diverse" diversity statement topic that can work as well.

Just as with personal statements, though, it's all about how you present your law school qualities vis-à-vis that experience.


4. What are some of the most common / funniest mistakes you've seen in students' personal statements?

You might have thought I was joking in #1 about applicants' writing about people who said they were good at arguing, but I've seen that in more than one rough draft. It's never good. Ever.

Another common mistake is what I call the "resume rundown," where the applicant simply restates his or her resume from college on through every job. Aside from being boring, the resume rundown wastes the only opportunity applicants have to present the more human side of themselves to the adcomm. The personal statement should round out the application and show the adcomm the full person, highlighting qualities that exist between the lines of the resume and that deserve to be emphasized, so don't throw away that chance by repeating things that can be found elsewhere in your application.


5. What are some examples of addendum topics that applicants should avoid?

I've had several people write to me and ask about whether they should write an addendum about a low LSAT score, and generally I say no -- especially if you're going to explain that you're not good at standardized tests since law school is all about one-and-done tests. If it was because of testing conditions that day or something outside of your control, the question that comes up in the adcomm's mind is, "Why didn't you take the test again then?"

A low GPA can be an OK topic if you've shown marked improvement over the course of college, while a low course grade may also be an acceptable topic under certain circumstances, e.g., the death of a parent or someone extremely close to you. This should go without saying, but don't lie when you're writing these kinds of explanations -- adcomms do go back and look at transcript and make sure your dots connect, so to speak.

If you do decide to write an addendum, make it as short and to the point as possible, and accept full responsibility where appropriate. The worst addenda end up looking like the applicant is scrambling to make excuses and that doesn't reflect well on a candidate for law school and could even harm the application.

***

Michelle Fabio, Esq. is a professional writer and editor, law school survivor, attorney, and former About.com Guide to Law School. After helping hundreds of applicants with essays through About.com, she has started Personal Statement Artist, a review and editing service dedicated exclusively to law school applicants. At PSA, Michelle offers several different levels of assistance, including brainstorming help, to help future law school students turn their applications into works of art.
Continue Reading...»

Deciding Whether To Go To Law School

LSAT Blog Deciding Whether To Go To Law SchoolThe below excerpt is from Thane Messinger's Law School: Getting In, Getting Good, Getting the Gold.

Why Law School?

There are almost as many reasons for wanting to attend law school as there are applicants. There isn’t so much a right or wrong reason—although many (including admissions committees) will judge you on just this basis. Some will say that the “right” reason is to right wrongs, fight for justice, and so on.

Others—belonging to a more cynical group—assume that any statement along those lines is just pretend (or, worse, naïve); they tend to believe that the “real” right reasons are practical: a job, a career, a fancy house and car, and lots and lots of money. Many attend because others believe they should. Some attend because others believe they should not. Still others attend because they don’t know what they want—but they know it’s not flipping burgers. Were we attorneys to be honest, our reasons for having gone to law school would likely be less honorable than what we had originally professed. In other words, our real reasons were quite different from the ones we spoke so loudly and often before entering.

The answer? Don’t focus on what others believe you should want, or on what you think you should want, but rather on what you really want. Ask what your real compulsions are.

If it’s parents, grow up. Sure, parents are important, and their views are rarely given the weight they deserve. (You’ll likely not agree as strongly as when you have children of your own.) Yet it’s your life. Live it. Be respectful—even if you don’t want to be—but don’t bend to their will if it’s not your will too. One test of adulthood is the ability to say “No”…for the right reason. This, ironically, is one of the tests in the law, and in law school. Also, if in thinking about law school you listen to various advice and end up taking whichever is easier—a bit like asking one parent when the other gives you the wrong answer—that’s not making a decision. It’s a cop-out. You should consider the options, and do what attorneys and judges must do every day: decide.

If it’s the fear and hassle of getting a job, grow up. Sure, getting a job is a hassle, and quite frustrating. Yet, as I will get into, there are practical reasons in law school that this is important. And if you’re fearful and annoyed now, that’s not ten percent of how fearsome and annoying it will be once you’re in law school. Take advantage of the time when an employer doesn’t expect all that much out of you (really!), and endeavor to wow them. If it’s a law firm you’re wowing, so much the better.

If it’s to make a difference, this is a terrific reason. But…

But you’ll need to be especially sensitive to the pace at which you will be able to make that difference, and to whom. This is not to give up anything, but to put yourself in a position where you can make a difference. More on that later.

If it’s to increase options, for glamour, or to enter a mythical genteel profession (complete with bowling hats), be careful. This is yet another reason to work in a law firm, even part-time and even for just a short while. There’s not quite any other way to get a taste of what the law is really all about.

If it’s money, stop. Law school is the wrong choice. Or, more correctly, if it’s just money, stop. You will almost certainly be unhappy, and you will almost as certainly not obtain your goal: only a small percentage of attorneys make as much as most believe all attorneys make.

I once had an English professor who started his first class by asking us what we wanted in life. Rhetorically, he asked “Money?” Most of us were silently responding “You bet!” He waited a moment and said, “If so, you should…leave.”

Taken aback, we waited for the explanation. He proceeded to let us in on a secret—one that is well known in the aphorism that “the A’s teach, and the B’s work for the C’s.” This saying was from the days before grade inflation, by the way, when the curve was set so that an “A” meant the top 6%—not 10%—and the “C’s” were about half of the class. Thus the phrase the “gentleman’s C.”

He told us that sitting as we were in English class, while of value to him and to us in ways we probably wouldn’t appreciate for years…was not on the path to money. He was right, in an important sense. If you want to make money—lots and lots of money—then don’t go to school. Even business school is a huge investment that rewards only a relatively small percentage.

Moreover, business school is of a vastly different character than law school, which focuses, essentially, on the allocation of risk. Business, alternatively, focuses on the creation and use of risk. Engineering might focus on the refinement of risks in ever-more sophisticated ways. Every other academic endeavor is fine if appreciated for what it is—and if appreciated for what it is not. One of the things that academics is not is a path to lots and lots of money.

If lots and lots of money is your goal, entrepreneurship is the path. And, by the way, this is not the dream of entrepreneurship that is sold in magazines; it is, instead, years of hard work. One successful entrepreneur once told me that the magic number was 20: it took that many years for a business to “suddenly” flourish. Having run a few businesses, I’d say that’s not too far off the mark. In most cases, it is years of work harder than in a corporate environment. It is, almost always, years and years of work in addition to a regular job.

For attorneys at top firms (either national or local), the J.D. does open doors into the corporate world, in both legal and business suites. There are a number of reasons for this—chief among them the analytical skills honed first in law school and then in practice and the on-going connections with business clients—yet this too only reinforces the importance of getting into the right school and getting good. So, if you’re interested potentially in the corporate world, or are considering an MBA/JD, this can be a path (even without the MBA), but again only if you place well.

This too is not meant to dissuade. Yet if making money is your real goal, then don’t go to law school. It’s fine to want money. It’s even okay to want a lot of money. But for law school you need a better reason. Wait until you have one, or find a different path closer to your true self. If you gloss over this in your search for success and happiness and do go to law school for this reason, chances are high that you will achieve neither.


Doubts

In a sense, this too is almost a requirement for going to law school. Many have doubts: sometimes secret, sometimes not. Often, the more boisterous the student, the more intense (and secret) are those doubts.

Doubts are fine, as long as those doubts relate to ancillary issues—“Which school?” “Should I buy Emmanuel’s or Gilbert’s?” “Will I really do well?”—and not to core issues—“How can I convince so-and-so that I really want to go?”

As the Oracle relates in The Matrix, you must know this at your core, “through and through, balls to bones”: a sense that law school is for you and you are for law school. It’s not for someone else to tell you.

Excerpt/interview for LSAT Blog / © Thane Messinger 2008-2011

Photo by zaniac
Continue Reading...»